Emergency meds through IJ

Published

Specializes in Skilled Rehab.

Hello,

I responded to to a code yesterday at my facility and while doing chest compressions I noticed the patient had a IJ I the right side of their chest. I later learned the patient was a diabetic with a blood glucose of below 30 and I remember seeing D50 and IV supplies unused at the bedside, the nurse gave IM glucagon. I feel stupid asking fellow co workers with more experience this question. In an emergent situation such as this could the D50 be given through the IJ when no other access is available? I know it's not ideal and generally nobody is to be playing with a dialysis patients lifeline but when the patient was being rushed out things didn't look so good...

An IJ is in the neck and not used for dialysis. A dialysis port should only be accessed according to facility policy. My facility policy states only a trained dialysis nurse or MD can access a dialysis port.

Specializes in Emergency Department.

An IJ would be seen on the neck, not the chest. What you might have seen was either a dialysis port or a subclavian line. Any which way you look at it, you'd have to follow facility policy/procedure for accessing those lines, even in the event of an emergency. As a paramedic, in a code situation, our own protocols would prefer that we access peripheral lines for those meds even if there's a central line of some sort in place. If there's only a central line available, then we could access the central line. They would prefer that we not access dialysis shunts as our catheters aren't designed for that purpose and will damage them. It would be rare for us to have Huber needles for those implanted ports...

If you're accredited by your facility to push code meds, you truly owe it to yourself to become very familiar with your facility's policies regarding accessing vascular access devices of all types for various situations, specifically which ones you may access and which ones you may not, and under which conditions.

Most of the nephrologists and vascular surgeons I know would raise an eyebrow and give that head-tilt-silent-it-just-dropped-60-degrees-in-here stare to using a CVC for anything but dialysis treatments. Some wouldn't have a problem with it as a last resort to save a patient's life.

In an emergent situation (as in the patient is crumping-about-to-die, and has no other viable alternative access), either a temporary dialysis catheter (seen in the neck) or a permanent dialysis catheter can and should be used for emergent meds.

In an acute setting, they can also be used as a last resort for infusions-- such as antibiotics and vasoactive drips-- as long as the person infusing has MD orders to use it (usually cleared by the nephrologist), and is trained per facility protocol in how to access and de-access. Again, last resort. The more a dialysis catheter is accessed, the more the potential for biofilm and fibrin to accumulate. These lines are the patient's lifeline--and replacing them increases the odds that there will be long term vascular impairment (such as stenoses and infection) for the patient.

Certain dialysis catheters can also be used for CVP measurements. Trialysis catheters are even more flexible in terms of potential uses.

I urge you to do some basic research via google. There are many different dialysis catheters with varying lengths, bores, materials, and placements/ acceptable uses.

An IJ is in the neck and not used for dialysis. A dialysis port should only be accessed according to facility policy. My facility policy states only a trained dialysis nurse or MD can access a dialysis port.

Oh really?

Please don't confuse the OP. Anecdotally speaking (off the top of my head), 100% of the new onset/ Acute/emergent dialysis calls I get involve emergent/temp dialysis catheters placed "in the neck."

Specializes in Dialysis.

I would use it in an emergency which is what your patient was experiencing. Hate to have to testify that the pt died because hospital protocol only allowed dialysis nurses to access. It is a central line like any other and should be treated as such. Wear a mask, scrub the access port with chlorahexidine, and know whether or not it is heparinized. If there is a heparin lock it must be aspirated or you risk giving the patient a heparin bolus. I have seen upwards of 7,500u of heparin to lock ports. Always flush with 20cc saline after each medication to ensure patency.

Your facility should have a policy regarding use of a dialysis catheter for non-dialysis reasons. (I'm assuming you work in an acute care facility). In my facility, we do have a policy allowing non-dialysis nurses to use the dialysis cath for blood draws, but in my experience, most non-dialysis nurses are not comfortable accessing a dialysis cath. If you don't know what you're doing, you could do more harm than good by introducing infection or pushing in a dose of heparin or TPA packing accidentally.

Specializes in Nephrology, Cardiology, ER, ICU.

All of this confusion on the part of the original poster as well as the rest of us points to this for me:

1. KNOW what type of line you are accessing.

2. Be familiar with your facilities' policy and procedures regarding all central lines

3. Yes, while permcaths can be/and usually are, locked with heparin it is important to understand what concentration is used and how much is used.

4. Again, review #1.

Best wishes.

Oh really?

Please don't confuse the OP. Anecdotally speaking (off the top of my head), 100% of the new onset/ Acute/emergent dialysis calls I get involve emergent/temp dialysis catheters placed "in the neck."

You are correct. I was not even considering a temporary dialysis catheter. Where I work they use the groin for temporary catheters which is maybe why I had a lapse in brain function. My intent was not to confuse the OP, sorry for that!

You are correct. I was not even considering a temporary dialysis catheter. Where I work they use the groin for temporary catheters which is maybe why I had a lapse in brain function. My intent was not to confuse the OP, sorry for that!

LOL! I can't tell you how many lapses in brain function I've had over the years, so I get it. :)

Curious though, you say that where you work they primarily access the femoral (groin) for temp catheters? That's weird. Usually a femoral cath is last resort for temp dialysis caths. I'm interested to know if there is a school of thought out there currently that finds the femoral preferable to an IJ.

The "rules" are always changing!

LOL! I can't tell you how many lapses in brain function I've had over the years, so I get it. :)

Curious though, you say that where you work they primarily access the femoral (groin) for temp catheters? That's weird. Usually a femoral cath is last resort for temp dialysis caths. I'm interested to know if there is a school of thought out there currently that finds the femoral preferable to an IJ.

The "rules" are always changing!

As far as I am aware, nationally the right IJ is still the preferred site. I would have to check with the docs for a definitive answer. I have been told a number of things...placing a temp catheter in the ED, the femoral is an easier access point in an emergent situation and doesn't require xray confirmation to use. We most often place them in patients with pulmonary edema or hyperkalemia and I have been told the femoral is preferred in those patients. I will have to ask one of the ultrasound fellows for the real rationale next time I see them.

+ Add a Comment