Published Dec 2, 2008
sweetieann
195 Posts
If a patient has an actual DVT, are compression stockings usually worn? I can see how on one hand, they should be because it will prevent furthur pooling of blood/the clot getting bigger. My only question is-couldn't the compression cause the clot to dislodge/break off and become a PE?
Thanks!
Virgo_RN, BSN, RN
3,543 Posts
Actually, once the person is able to ambulate, compression stockings are recommended for up to six months following the DVT.
if a person is already wearing compression stockings for edema and then they have a suspected but not yet confirmed possible DVT, should they continue to wear the stockings until a definitive diagnosis made? They ordered dopplers on the patient, but they are ambulating around now.
I would say yes. However, if they have a suspected DVT, they probably should not be ambulating and should have that extremity elevated above the level of their heart.
Is the person anticoagulated?
The physician assistant ordered a doppler study but no mention of bedrest of anything. No anticoagulation. This is at a psych hospital, pt pretty medically stable. Had some swelling of one ankle. Thanks for your help!
Hopefully the doppler's negative.
Daytonite, BSN, RN
1 Article; 14,604 Posts
if a patient has an actual dvt, are compression stockings usually worn?
my only question is-couldn't the compression cause the clot to dislodge/break off and become a pe?
Flightline, BSN, RN
213 Posts
Thanks Daytonite. That's some good info I wasn't aware of.
GrumpyRN63, ADN, RN
833 Posts
Once the pt is dx w/ a DVT( in the acute period) we no longer place venodynes on that leg,--- nor is the pt kept on bedrest, that was done many moons ago