Cord Cutting - delayed/no?
Featured Replies
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Currently Reading 0
- No registered users viewing this page.
A better way to browse. Learn more.
A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.
Just wanted to pull this question out to its own thread. I'm just a student, currently, but am a mom of 3, and an avid birth enthusiast and am curious on the thoughts of others regarding this.
I mentioned delayed cord cutting in the "is midwifery safer/more dangerous" thread, and the response was "we have time to grab the scissors", which wasn't exactly what I meant.
For my last two births, we did not specifically delay cord cutting, but there is a theory that delayed cutting of the cord increases nutrients to the infant, even if its just a 2 minute delay.
Here is one article:
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2006/06/060618224104.htm
Here's another:
http://www.cfah.org/hbns/news/premature10-18-04.cfm
Obviously if there were problems that required a hasty removing of the baby that would take priority, but my midwife encouraged delayed cord cutting.
I'm just curious what our OB Nurses have seen in practice? I'm sure that the more "baby factory" the hospital, the less this will happen, but has this been debunked anywhere or is this a part of evidence based practice or just another of those things that is generally not considered in hospital based birth?