Published
I think FNP is your best bet. You can still teach as you can with any degree, you can be a NP or simply APRN if you prefer, and you'll be more advanced with respect to assessment techniques, diagnostics, physiology, amd pharmacology compared with your peers. The CNS role is too ambiguous, IMO.
I am an adult and peds CNS (dual certified). In IL, where I practice, an FNP=me as to scope of practice. However, that is NOT true in all states.
I've been an APRN for almost 10 years now and yes, if I had to do it again, I would go the ACNP and PACNP route. I would NOT go the FNP route because I would want to work in-pt.
That is just my take on it. I always recommend nurses familiarize themselves with the Consensus Model and LACE which the AACN gurus (ie desk jockeys) have put out.
The AACN makes recommendations and its up to the individual states to adopt it or not. So, after you read the Consensus Model, there is a state map to allow you to see which state has adopted it.
ESnt16
19 Posts
I have read a lot about the CNS role being phased out. However, I have been looking at jobs here in Georgia for CNSs and NPs, and I find interesting that there are more jobs available for CNSs than for NPs. I really like the idea of becoming a CNS (I am not interested in having prescriptive powers), but I am scared about what could happen by the time I finish my masters. I am also scared about the liability that comes with the NP role. Another option would be to get my masters in education and then a post grad certificate as FNP.
I am confused. I want to continue advancing in my career, a flexible schedule (M-F, 8-5), and the ability to practice bedside nursing (which I love).
I plan to start my masters degree in fall 2016 or spring 2017.
Any thoughts?