Did You Know?
allnurses is the largest community for nurses on the web. We now have over 388,686 members! Join today to network with other nurses, laugh, share, and much more.
| No. 50 |
Dec 09, 2006, 08:19 PM
Re: Circulators Originally Posted by RNOTODAY Ask the same doc if he would rather have the nurse if she also had just as much experience scrubbing. Its not the scrub tech vs nurse thing, its a who knows how to scrub vs who doesnt.
Why would you ask a doc that in the first place. In the OR is not the time or place for this even at the scrub sink its still a no no. People will get upset if the answer isnt both. Thats how feelings get hurt and trouble starts in the OR. People want to talk smack here is one thing or after work with a margarita.
| | Advertisement Sponsored Links | | | | No. 51 |
Dec 09, 2006, 08:22 PM
Re: Circulators
Let's just face it here, Surgical tech are the only person besides the surgeon in the room that has had formal training. The only person in the room that is considered OJT is the nurse. Nursing schools need to focus more on offering this course as a part of the program. Please do not say she has some nerves, be honest surgical techs have been educated just for this job. Surgery is a techinal field. I love nurses and yes they are needed in the operating room, yes they have an higher education so far as patient care is consider, and yes patient care is important in the Operating room, but you have two indiviual who with 12+ years education regarding that( surgeon+anthesia etc.). Please let's stop this Nurse vs. Tech. Because when it all boils down to it, the doctor really do not care who is in the room with him/her, just along as the case is ready when their ready and the person is capable of doing their job. He would not care if casper the ghost brought the patient in the room and woody woodpecker set the case up!!!!  Nurses are great ,so are CST!!! we are a team.
| | No. 52 |
Dec 11, 2006, 07:23 PM
Re: Circulators
Mercy this is one hotly debated topic!
As an OR nurse I have some observations. I'm not an ST or CST nor am I OJT. I was trained in school along with clinicals in patient focused care, which is what I provide in the OR. True, I had to learn specifics to the OR environment once there and would have had to do the same environment specific care in any area of nursing I chose to practice. The ST/CST was trained in specific instrumentation, sterile field/technique, procedure, etc. all of which are specific to the OR environment and truly not adaptable to another environment. The training is technique oriented for the most part. Which one is more important? You can't have one and not the other, the patient and surgical team require both. I would give my eye teeth for some of my techs, they are invaluable. The ones I wouldn't are those who have made it a point to tell me that in their mind the circulator is nothing more than a glorified typist and has no place in the OR, that there is nothing the circulator does that a tech can't do. Yet one of these same techs when I was concerned over a patient's low Na value stated she had no idea what that meant, I was talking Greek and furthermore, she didn't really care.
I make a point of thanking my techs personally, letting them know how much I value their expertise and input as well as how valuable they are to the team. The techs who have the above mentioned attitudes about circulators take that as 'acknowledgement of their superiority' in the OR setting and the lack of a need for a circulator. The techs who I find invaluable accept it with gratitude, acknowledge that we each contribute greatly to the patient's care and are both invaluable. The respect is mutual. I know they have knowledge of and can do things I have very little skill and likewise, they acknowledge I have knowledge and skills they lack. It isn't a competition. Furthermore, I am sure to let them know I appreciate their professionalism and teamwork. Those who are truly team members will go out of their way to help one another, tech or nurse.
| | No. 53 |
Dec 11, 2006, 07:25 PM
Re: Circulators
Mercy this is one hotly debated topic!
As an OR nurse I have some observations. I'm not an ST or CST nor am I OJT. I was formally trained in school along with clinicals in patient focused care, which is what I provide in the OR. True, I had to learn specifics to the OR environment once there and would have had to do the same environment specific care in any area of nursing I chose to practice. The ST/CST was trained in specific instrumentation, sterile field/technique, procedure, etc. all of which are specific to the OR environment and truly not adaptable to another environment. The training is technique oriented for the most part. Which one is more important? You can't have one and not the other, the patient and surgical team require both. I would give my eye teeth for some of my techs, they are invaluable. The ones I wouldn't are those who have made it a point to tell me that in their mind the circulator is nothing more than a glorified typist and has no place in the OR, that there is nothing the circulator does that a tech can't do. Yet one of these same techs when I was concerned over a patient's low Na value stated she had no idea what that meant, I was talking Greek and furthermore, she didn't really care.
I make a point of thanking my techs personally, letting them know how much I value their expertise and input as well as how valuable they are to the team. The techs who have the above mentioned attitudes about circulators take that as 'acknowledgement of their superiority' in the OR setting and the lack of a need for a circulator. The techs who I find invaluable accept it with gratitude, acknowledge that we each contribute greatly to the patient's care and are both invaluable. The respect is mutual. I know they have knowledge of and can do things I have very little skill and likewise, they acknowledge I have knowledge and skills they lack. It isn't a competition. Furthermore, I am sure to let them know I appreciate their professionalism and teamwork. Those who are truly team members will go out of their way to help one another, tech or nurse.
| | No. 54 |
Dec 11, 2006, 09:13 PM
Updated
Dec 11, 2006 at 09:27 PM by heather2084
Re: Circulators Originally Posted by crackerjack Mercy this is one hotly debated topic!
That it surely is. But you can't come into a nursing forum and try to tell nurses their job is easily replaced or that their job can be done by anyone. Anytime someone goes to school or training to become something, and then you tell them they can be easily replaced by someone else, you're guaranteed to get into a highly intense discussion.
| | No. 55 |
Dec 11, 2006, 09:14 PM
Updated
Dec 11, 2006 at 09:17 PM by tntech1
Re: Circulators Originally Posted by crackerjack Mercy this is one hotly debated topic!
As an OR nurse I have some observations. I'm not an ST or CST nor am I OJT. I was formally trained in school along with clinicals in patient focused care, which is what I provide in the OR. True, I had to learn specifics to the OR environment once there and would have had to do the same environment specific care in any area of nursing I chose to practice. The ST/CST was trained in specific instrumentation, sterile field/technique, procedure, etc. all of which are specific to the OR environment and truly not adaptable to another environment. The training is technique oriented for the most part. Which one is more important? You can't have one and not the other, the patient and surgical team require both. I would give my eye teeth for some of my techs, they are invaluable. The ones I wouldn't are those who have made it a point to tell me that in their mind the circulator is nothing more than a glorified typist and has no place in the OR, that there is nothing the circulator does that a tech can't do. Yet one of these same techs when I was concerned over a patient's low Na value stated she had no idea what that meant, I was talking Greek and furthermore, she didn't really care.
I make a point of thanking my techs personally, letting them know how much I value their expertise and input as well as how valuable they are to the team. The techs who have the above mentioned attitudes about circulators take that as 'acknowledgement of their superiority' in the OR setting and the lack of a need for a circulator. The techs who I find invaluable accept it with gratitude, acknowledge that we each contribute greatly to the patient's care and are both invaluable. The respect is mutual. I know they have knowledge of and can do things I have very little skill and likewise, they acknowledge I have knowledge and skills they lack. It isn't a competition. Furthermore, I am sure to let them know I appreciate their professionalism and teamwork. Those who are truly team members will go out of their way to help one another, tech or nurse.
Thank you so much. I agree with you. I never played the nurse vs. tech game, until now. I got caught up in this mess. This is not me. See you are the kind of nurse I use to work with everyday and enjoyed every minute of it. You are not caught up in a title. I so agree with you, we are a team, techs and nurses are both needed. Please lets STOP This. Yeah some techs think their the most important person in the room and their are some nurses who think their the most important person. We are not ,the patient is!! LET'S JUST GET ALONG!!! | | No. 56 |
Dec 11, 2006, 09:54 PM
Re: Circulators Originally Posted by heather2084 That it surely is. But you can't come into a nursing forum and try to tell nurses their job is easily replaced or that their job can be done by anyone. Anytime someone goes to school or training to become something, and then you tell them they can be easily replaced by someone else, you're guaranteed to get into a highly intense discussion.
No doubt!! 
That's exactly why I detest working with a couple of our techs. Recently these same two folks spend half the case as well as breaks and lunches carping about the pay difference between nurses and techs, telling us how it's so unfair that we make more yada yada. Hello, I could've gone to school to be a CST (might have liked it more just because I like being in the blood and gore grits of things) or I could've chosen to persue any number of careers that pay much more than what I get now and require little to no schooling but I know I'd hate it. The fact of the matter is I chose nursing because it still gets me in the door to patient care, faster than med school-which was my true first desire, has better pay than a CST and still is something I love. I guess I could complain how <insert profession requiring no education but pays $$$> make so much more than me and how it's unfair since I went to school and all but sheesh. I'm sorry, ok not really sorry, that they chose ST school instead of RN and now are paid less than I am. The pay difference has been what it is for much longer than they've been a tech so give it a rest, guess you should've chosen differently or at least be able to live with the choice.
Sorry, that was a rant that is not completely on topic. It is just another example of why I find it difficult to work with those couple of folks. It's gotten to the point where I'm having to get up and leave the break room or walk away from where ever else one of these folks are at just to get away from the caustic cloud perpetuated.
| | No. 57 |
Dec 13, 2006, 05:07 PM
Re: Circulators
Well, I am new to the OR, so, as you may well know, the techs are invaluable to me. They simply know more than me right now. And I value them.However, if I were to scrub every day, I would become just as good as them....On the other hand, there are some of them who think the nurses are idiots, and they are the ones who really do any work, etc etc etc. There are also housekeepers who think that they work the hardest. I guess the point I am trying to make is, could the role of circulator be done by anybody with training? I must say, maybe so. Will it happen? I say absolutely not.... if for no other reason then to have someone with a LICENSE to take the heat if something goes bad. The OR was my choice, mainly, because I have no interest in "traditional" pt care, I like the technology and I like to be precise with things (counts, sterility etc). Techs are good at what they do, because they do it day in and day out. If a nurse (circulator) only scrubbed, she would be just as proficient. And I know quite a few who can do BOTH. The OR is a big world. The only really important person in the room, is the surgeon. The rest of us are just employees!!!!! Get over yourselves........Every patient deserves a RN. It doesnt even sound right.... to have a patient undergo SURGERY, without a nurse assigned to their care? It will never happen. Never.
| | No. 58 |
Dec 13, 2006, 05:12 PM
Re: Circulators Originally Posted by crackerjack No doubt!! 
That's exactly why I detest working with a couple of our techs. Recently these same two folks spend half the case as well as breaks and lunches carping about the pay difference between nurses and techs, telling us how it's so unfair that we make more yada yada. Hello, I could've gone to school to be a CST (might have liked it more just because I like being in the blood and gore grits of things) or I could've chosen to persue any number of careers that pay much more than what I get now and require little to no schooling but I know I'd hate it. The fact of the matter is I chose nursing because it still gets me in the door to patient care, faster than med school-which was my true first desire, has better pay than a CST and still is something I love. I guess I could complain how <insert profession requiring no education but pays $$$> make so much more than me and how it's unfair since I went to school and all but sheesh. I'm sorry, ok not really sorry, that they chose ST school instead of RN and now are paid less than I am. The pay difference has been what it is for much longer than they've been a tech so give it a rest, guess you should've chosen differently or at least be able to live with the choice.
Sorry, that was a rant that is not completely on topic. It is just another example of why I find it difficult to work with those couple of folks. It's gotten to the point where I'm having to get up and leave the break room or walk away from where ever else one of these folks are at just to get away from the caustic cloud perpetuated.
Right!!! I always say, its a free country, you can go to school to be a nurse just like the rest of us.... just like I could have gone to school to be a md, crna,lawyer,
heck, some days I admire the shuttle bus drivers job!!!!  But, I chose what I chose.
| | No. 59 |
Dec 16, 2006, 12:21 AM
Re: Circulators
Again, I chose what I chose. An orchestra does not perfrom based only on the soloist(the surgeon), but rather on the team as a whole. I am a CST. I am only as good as the team I scrub with, including my circulator and anesthesia if things go poorly, but I am also the one (among many) that can make things go well. I can appreciate variances in a CBC, and know what it means for me, as well as my circ, surgeon, and PATIENT. We are not out for each others jobs, and for the most part respect what each member of the team bring to the procedure. If we do not cooperate with each other, and what we can provide to our patient, the result is chaos.
| | 83 members
1,154 guests 1,237 | 42 | | | 0 | | | 5 | | | 8 | | | 22 | | | 2 | | | 13 | | | 63 | | | 14 | | | 12 | | | 43 | | | 1 | | | 13 | | | 2 | | | 10 | | | 17 | | | 11 | | | 16 | | | 16 | | | 42 | | | 14 | | | 21 | | | 23 | | | 20 | | | 24 | | |
Nursing News