Who are the Uninsured?

Nurses Activism

Published

Who are the Uninsured? October 16, 2003

Numbers Point to Problem Created When Legislation Driven by Headlines

By Chris Patterson

Another horrifying announcement from our newspapers a few weeks ago - millions of Americans are uninsured. It's so often repeated, we no longer have to ask what people are going without. This is about health insurance.

Most articles began with alarming statistics, as the Austin American-Statesman did: "The number of Americans who lack health insurance climbed by nearly 6 percent in 2002, to 43.6 million, the largest single increase in a decade, according to figures to be released today by the Census Bureau."

Such stories, and agitated editorials that followed, are geared to evoke cries of outrage for the victims. We are led to believe that this "crisis" is "growing" and, like random urban violence, not one of us may be spared.

Editorial pages have been calling on legislators - state and federal - to do something, and do it quickly. They call for more laws, more spending, more taxes, more government.

We need to breath deeply, calm down and look at the facts.

The National Center for Policy Analysis, based in Dallas, recently examined the numbers of "uninsured."

Almost three-fourths of the newly "uninsured" are people who are making over $50,000, according to the NCPA report, and simply choose not to purchase health insurance. While this decision says many things about the cost of medicine, it does not mean that people without health insurance are poor and desperate for help.

Since 1993 the number of uninsured in households with annual incomes above $75,000 increased 114 percent, according to the NCPA. On the other side of the economic divide, the study finds the number of uninsured with annual incomes below $25,000 fell by 17 percent.

The NCPA uncovered some facts that don't make it to the newspapers. For example, young adults are less likely than other age groups to have health insurance, while those over 65 are almost all insured. Americans between the ages of 18 and 34 make up some 41 percent of the "uninsured." This makes sense. We all remember the invincible years of the twenties - that is a healthy age and most young people are making the economic decision not to waste their money for insurance they do not need at the time.

Most interesting of NCPA's findings is the length of time people remain uninsured: just under a year in 75 percent of the cases.

The shrillness of many press releases and news stories disguise the fact that many without health insurance are making a rational choice. Trumping feelings over fact, the uninsured are portrayed as hapless victims of hard employers and greedy insurers.

While passing legislation to create more programs that spend more money might make for good politics, they do no good in the long run and often deflect resources from the truly needy.

Perhaps the only accurate conclusion we can draw from headlines is that a great many Americans are opting to take care of themselves in ways not reflected in insurance headcounts. Instead of creating more programs, lawmakers should search for ways to make it easier for us all to plan and pay for our individual health care needs. Rather than raising taxes to slay an illusionary dragon, legislators could reduce the mandates making health care - and health insurance - so expensive for every one.

Chris Patterson is director of research for the Texas Public Policy Foundation, a non-profit, non-partisan research institution.

TexasPolicy.com

Specializes in ER, ICU, L&D, OR.
If someone gets hurt at work, or experiences a catostrophic illness during the working years, they HAVE extablished themselves as working Americans. If they have retired, they too have established themselves as working Americans. Therefore, they are the people that should get the care.

Disablility needs to be redefined. There are far too many "disabled" folks sitting around on their duffs when in fact they could work a few hours or more a day.

And don't bring up severely disabled people. You know we are not talking about them. They were either disabled at birth or while minors (therefore they will get care based on the care givers work history) If an adult becomes severely disabled, they have their own work history. You see, the only people we are excluding are those who just won't work cause it doesn't pay them to give up government benefits to make 5 or 6 bucks an hour. Then there's the ones who are just too darn lazy.

Like I said, no work, no benefits.

Didnt Captain John Smith say that a few hundred years ago

in the early colony years

This is a great and powerfull and immensely wealthy country, are we going to begrudge some people health care just because they dont measure up to our standards.

I dont think we can do that and remain as great as we have been and are. We scream Human Rights at other nations around the world, but we want to avoid helping our own and giving them the same care we have.

Specializes in ER, ICU, L&D, OR.

I would rather see our taxes help our people as opposed to getting our soldiers killed and killing Iraqui citizens.

Specializes in ER Occ Health Urgent Care.
Kitkat, I really enjoy some of your posts. That said, generalizing about liberals is just as much a personal attack as being called stupid. It's more subtle, but no less insulting.

Now, back to the topic at hand.... how do we require people to pay in a free market system?

And believe me, my doctor is my doctor, not the government. I have tried to explain how our system works, but if you would say that, I obviously haven't done a very good job. I pick my doctor, we determine my care, I can fire him and pick a new doctor anytime.

By the way, one of the benefits companies have in setting up shop here is that they don't have to cough up nearly as much benefit money thanks to the health care system. Ontario has lured more businesses here over the years from the great lake states thanks in part to that.

I worked for a company in michigan in occ health and we also had a factory in canada. In MI we had about 600 employee's Canada had twice as many. Our workers comp was over 1 mil that doesn't even consider regular medical plan. In canada the company got extra money from the gov for having fewer than the average injury rate and then add in the money they saved from health insurance. Guess where they were adding jobs? It wasn't Michigan.

Heh. I am working mostly to pay for health insurance. That ofered through my husband's job doesn't pay claims and cahnges their providers on a whim so we ended up out of pocket thousands last year. It will cost us about $10,000 this year for premiums. I literally work half of my hours to pay for the insurance as I'm p/t.

Specializes in ER Occ Health Urgent Care.
Fergus,

If people hold left-wing liberal views than they should be proud and wear it like a medal. The most respect that I had for a nurse friend is when she said, "I am practically a socialist, so I don't agree with you." I thought, well good at least she admits that. I can respect that. However, when people believe all the same things that liberals believe and then deny that they in fact, are liberals it is confusing. If it walks like a duck, and quacks like a duck, it's a duck. I admit proudly that I am a conservative. I hold conservative viewpoints. And, although most posters here are against most of what I say, I still believe in conservative values and principles. In respect to Universal healthcare, I wanted to find out more and research more before I made a decision.

I have posted many fact finders on Canadian healthcare about waiting on average median of 26 weeks for a total knee replacement for instance. We don't wait that long in the US currently even under our HMO's.

So, once I do find information that is significant it is hard to debate statistics and that information. Breast cancer survival rates for instance are significantly lower in Canada then in the US. Why is that? Waits for "elective" mastectomies? Waits for mammography? Wait too long the cancer spreads and death is the result.

Kitkat

There are many narrow minded people who want to catoragize every one libral or conservative. The problem with that is people have many veiws they maybe libral when it comes to universal health and may be consevative when it comes to abortion as just one example. I think all this name calling and insistance on declaring a person libral or conservative has only done 1 thing and that is divide our country as never before in our history. There are a lot of people in the middle who have a combination of liberal and conservative views and this, if you are not with us on every issue you are against us attitude is harmfull!

Specializes in ER, ICU, L&D, OR.

I thought this tired old thread died and went to thread heaven

We aould be better off with a single payer system.

Specializes in ER Occ Health Urgent Care.

Sorry I don't beleive the all or nothing argument, we have gov't sponsored schools police fire libraries roads ect none of these has made our country socialist they are for the good of the entire society as is healthcare. However I'm with ya when it come to jobs and immigration, our curren adnministration now wants to give all of our trucking jobs to Mexico and is willling to build the trans texan corridor to help them take our jobs. I just can't beleive ow they are willing to sell us out.

Like it or not, you can have socialism - or you can have liberty - but you can't have both. As far as I am concerned, you either support and defend the Constitution (an American) - or you don't (anti-American). It is that simple.

Moreover, when talking about this issue, it seems that other factors need to be discussed such as the trade agreements like NAFTA. At one time, companies were proud to say they were an American company; but not anymore. "To promote the general welfare" means the government should take the necessary steps to ensure that now only American jobs are safe, but that they pay adequately to support the necessities of life such as medical costs.

As an American, I am totally against socialism - period. I am however for the Constitution and the government doing its job (obligations) as is mandated. By allowing high paying jobs to go to other countries, lax immigration laws and poor trade policies, the government is doing everything it can to for American into socialism. Wake up people. See how it all ties together. Look at the bigger picture.

sor

+ Add a Comment