Going Down to the wire.....
First came the last-minute side-swipe from the hospital:
Newsday
February 28, 2002
"In Strike Talks, A Snag? Or A Recess?
BY: Barbara J. Durkin. STAFF WRITER
EDITION: NASSAU AND
SECTION: News
It looked good that a settlement in the three- month-long strike by nurses at St. Catherine of Siena Medical Center in Smithtown might be within reach, as negotiations stretched from 10 a.m. Tuesday into the early morning hours yesterday.
But by 6:30 a.m., the talks were over - with no contract.
Depending on whom you asked, the talks either broke down in an angry dispute over "return-to-work" issues or simply adjourned as a matter of course so negotiators could iron out remaining issues when they were fresh.
The New York State Nurses Association, the union representing the 474 nurses who have been striking since November, said yesterday that it was filing unfair labor practice charges with the National Labor Relations Board as a result of the latest talks.
The main issue that ended the talks, the nurses' union said, is a hospital request that nurses who crossed the picket line would not face any union charges. Twenty-nine nurses (out of the more than 450 on strike) have crossed the picket line since the strike began 94 days ago, union representative Michael Chacon said. All but three of them have resigned from the union, which means union charges cannot be lodged against them.
"This has made things 20 times worse than they were before," Chacon said. "They are essentially holding us hostage over three nurses."
But St. Catherine's president Jim Wilson saw the matter differently. "Talks did not break down. Talks were recessed," said Wilson, noting that considerable progress had been made in the last two prolonged bargaining sessions.
Both sides agree that virtually all issues have been agreed to except for the return-to-work issues. While the union could ask that members not file charges against the three nurses, he said, any NYSNA member can bring such complaints, under the union's bylaws.
"They asked us to waive our members' rights and violate our bylaws," Chacon said. "Even if we wanted to, we could not."
But Wilson said the hospital believed the union had the latitude to do that.
When the strike is over, he said, "There has to be forgiveness on everyone's part for all the things that have occurred during the strike."
Chacon agreed that healing must take place but he said the hospital's latest demand has hurt negotiations.
"The nurses are unbelievably angry," he said.
Union officials yesterday said the NLRB, just this week, upheld earlier bad-faith bargaining charges brought against St. Catherine's, including reneging on previous agreements, responding with inferior proposals and failing to pay nurses the vacation and holiday time they are owed.
Bringing the charges means there is sufficient evidence to bring the matter before an administrative law judge, who ultimately will decide whether the hospital violated labor law, said Al Blyer, regional director of the Brooklyn office of the NLRB.
Should a contract be agreed upon, however, such charges could be dropped altogether.
Blyer also said if the hospital were to insist on the union promising not to discipline nurses - if all other matters were resolved - that possibly could constitute an unfair labor practice.
He also noted that while union officials may not be able to stop individuals from bringing charges against the nurses, those officials likely would investigate the charges and could decide what actions should be taken.
Contract talks are set to resume on Sunday.
http://www.newsday.com/news/local/lo...ws%2Dheadlines
Nursing News