Do you want to have to win a lottery to see the doctor?

Nurses Activism

Published

The National Post reports on how some Canadian doctors have held lotteries to determine which patients to eliminate from their practices, while other doctors held lotteries to decide who they'll accept. By shedding some patients doctors hope to avoid imposing a 5-minute appointment assembly line on the rest of their patients. Similarly, restricting new patients through a lottery keeps patient loads manageable.

Both lotteries reflect the severe shortage of primary doctors in Canada -- yet another example of medical personnel shortages (and surpluses) that tend to crop up under nationalized single-payer health care systems. (Last year it was a nurse shortage and hospital consultant glut in the U.K.)

After being kicked out of her doctor's practice, one patient was forced to drive 18 kilometers to the next town to find a doctor.

More~~~

http://www.statehousecall.org/canadian-doctors-hold-lotteries-to-decide-who-gets-access-to-care

Specializes in Acute post op ortho.
Only the paranoids will use the unemployment line.

Those in the know will establish healthcare speakeasys.

The funds will run out, you do realize that, don't you?

When there are on funds, there are no paychecks.

Hawaii went under in 7 months.

http://gateway.nlm.nih.gov/MeetingAbstracts/ma?f=103624039.html

well lets just make a list of prominent democrats that don't feel the need to pay their taxes or just palin cheat.

Tim Geitner, Tom Daschle. Charlie Rangel, Kathleen Sebelius, Nancy Killefer, Ron Kirk, Hilda Solis (Spouse), Let's not forget the sweetheart loan deals of Christopher Dodd, and Kent Conrad or Harry Reid's shady land deals in Nevada.

Could you please explain why you believe that the left doesn't pay taxes?
Specializes in Critical Care.
The funds will run out, you do realize that, don't you?

When there are on funds, there are no paychecks.

Hawaii went under in 7 months.

http://gateway.nlm.nih.gov/MeetingAbstracts/ma?f=103624039.html

The funds will be fine because we'll just use death panels to ration healthcare.

Specializes in Acute post op ortho.

Math=paranoia?

OK.

Cool, then it will be just like England.

The funds will be fine because we'll just use death panels to ration healthcare.
Specializes in Critical Care.
Math=paranoia?

OK.

Geometry, specifically.

Specializes in Critical care, tele, Medical-Surgical.

It's worse than that...it's physics.

Specializes in Psych , Peds ,Nicu.

Yep Black Hole .

The present healthcare financing system is collapsing on itself , if it wasn't there would be no drive to reform . We in combination with our employers are pouring ever increasing amounts into healthcare premiums , at some point they will become too great for us to bear . Then what ?

Specializes in Critical Care.
Cool, then it will be just like England.

That sounds like something a red would say.

Don't make me report you to HUAC, comrade.

Specializes in Acute post op ortho.
It's worse than that...it's physics.

No, it's worse than physics, it's money.

Restructuring: A View from the Bedside

Over the last decade we heard much about the need for deficit reduction as major cuts were made to social services (Peterson and Lupton 1996). The variety of organizational changes that resulted within the healthcare system are commonly referred to as "restructuring." Beds and even entire hospitals were closed and patient care services reduced. Nursing positions, as large budget items, became cost-cutting priorities. As a result, hospitals' shares of total expenditures are starting to slip, yet overall, healthcare costs continue to rise. Drug costs and physicians' services seem largely responsible for the increase (Canadian Institute for Health Information 2000). For the nurses still in the system, workloads increased dramatically. Another major outcome was an expanding "casualization" of labour, as caring work is now performed increasingly by part-time staff: a flexible "skill mix" of nurses and lesser-skilled/unskilled workers (Huston 1996; Prescott 1993).

Unskilled labor to save money in socialized Canada.

Why do you think so many nurses moved to the US from Canada in the 1990's?

I can tell you in one word:

UNEMPLOYED

http://www.longwoods.com/product.php?productid=17025

Specializes in Critical care, tele, Medical-Surgical.

We did get one Canadian RN as a travel nurse at my hospital in the ninties. She was a fine nurse and friend who went back to Toronto after six months.

This was just a year after 30% of our RNs were laid off when they forced so called "Patient Focused Care" on us. We had to take a class where we were told that RNs were too educated to do the everyday messy nursing work, We would be the supervisors while LVNs and nursing assistants did the hands on care.

Just who did they think nurses had been focusing on for that past 150 years?

And we were called "troublemaker" when we actually focused on what was best for our patients.

...Thousands of health care professionals have been laid off. At Kaiser Permanente facilities in Northern California, for example, 1,600 RNs were laid off from 1994 through 1996.

A 1997 survey by the California Board of Registered Nursing showed 5% of respondents had left nursing because of downsizing.

Patients and communities were stripped of care statewide. Services were reduced, patients began to experience longer waits for care and, according to numerous studies, there is a rise in medical errors often attributable to chronic short-staffing, fatigued health professionals or other poor conditions.

Growing numbers of RNs decided that they were no longer willing to work in conditions that they believe threatened their patients, their licensure and their physical and emotional well-being. A 1999 study by the consulting firm of William M. Mercer cited a 17% RN turnover nationwide, with 43% of nurses, naming workload and staffing as the reasons....

http://articles.latimes.com/2000/dec/26/local/me-4748

Specializes in Acute post op ortho.

good, then you are prepared for the cuts that will come with government run care. the purpose of government run care is to:

1. reduce costs

2. expand the rolls of insured persons.

and you thought you were stretched a far as you could go.

because 'nursing' is viewed as one of the top 3 major expenses, and the 'expanded rolls of insured, means-- many, many many, more patients in the doctors office, clinics, outpatient facilities & hospitals, one of the solutions is to replace rn's with 'a flexible "skill mix" of nurses and lesser-skilled/unskilled workers.'

abstract:

this qualitative study reports on the perspectives of hospital staff nurses regarding the recent restructuring of canadian healthcare. they were the group on the front lines bearing the brunt of the changes. yet, mostly they had not been consulted, as the decisions were made elsewhere. twenty staff nurses working in a variety of toronto hospitals were interviewed and described the impacts on themselves and their patients. while restructuring focused on deficit reduction and increased efficiency, the factors affecting quality of patient care and work life of nurses were neglected. the major strategies employed - increased workloads, casualization and deskilling - changed nurses' work at the bedside. stable teams disappeared as nurses were hired into casualized positions. care was reduced to specific tasks and routinized, to be carried out by a "skill-mix" of workers. the nurses' relationships with patients, the "heart and soul of nursing," became largely limited to managing care for a number of patients over one shift. lack of time and continuity with their patients left nurses dissatisfied. the voices of bedside nurses and their suggestions for change add some novel perspectives to the restructuring discourse.

"each time a new task is given away to another worker some of my colleagues say, 'well, what is there for us to do now?' i can see our roles vanishing, they could be vanishing."

http://www.longwoods.com/product.php?productid=17025

+ Add a Comment