A Call to Action from the Nation's Nurses in the Wake of Newtown

Nurses Activism

Published

  1. Nurses: Do You Support a Call to Action in the Wake of Newtown + other shootings

    • 54
      I support need for improved mental health services for individuals and families
    • 7
      I do not support need for improved mental health services for individuals and families.
    • 3
      Unsure if improved mental health services for individuals and families.needed
    • 43
      I support increased student access elementary thru college to nurses and mental health professionals.
    • 7
      I do not support increased student access elementary thru college to nurses and mental health professionals.
    • 7
      Unsure of need for increased student access elementary thru college to nurses and mental health professionals
    • 28
      I support a ban on assault weapons and enacting other meaningful gun control reforms to protect society.
    • 34
      I do not support an assault weapons ban and enacting other meaningful gun control reforms to protect society.
    • 4
      Unsure of position on assault weapons ban and enacting other meaningful gun control reforms.
    • 28
      I support an armed police presence at schools.
    • 19
      I do not support an armed police presence at schools.
    • 14
      Unsure of position on an armed police presence at schools.
    • 33
      I support our Nursing Associations commitment to ending this cycle of preventable violence, death, and trauma
    • 16
      I do not support our Nursing Associations commitment to ending this cycle of preventable violence, death, and trauma.
    • 6
      Unsure of supporting our Nursing Associations commitment to ending this cycle of preventable violence, death, and trauma.

54 members have participated

Reposting from PSNA Communications email. Karen

A Call to Action from the Nation's Nurses in the Wake of Newtown

More Than 30 Nursing Organizations Call for Action in Wake of Newtown Tragedy

(12/20/12)

Like the rest of the nation, America's nurses are heartbroken as we grieve the unthinkable loss and profound tragedy that unfolded last week in Newtown, Connecticut. This horrific event is a tipping point and serves as a call to action. The nation's nurses demand that political and community leaders across this country address longstanding societal needs to help curb this endless cycle of senseless violence.

Our country has witnessed unspeakable acts of mass shootings. The common thread in each of these tragedies has been the lethal combination of easy access to guns and inadequate access to mental health services.

As the largest single group of clinical health care professionals, registered nurses witness firsthand the devastation from the injuries sustained from gun violence. We also witness the trauma of individuals, families, and communities impacted by violence.

The care and nurturing of children in their earliest years provides a strong foundation for healthy growth and development as they mature into adulthood. Children, parents, and society face growing challenges with respect to widespread bullying and mental illness, and nurses understand the value of early intervention. Over the past decade, ill-advised and shortsighted cutbacks within schools and community health care systems have seriously impeded critical and needed access to school nurses and mental health professionals trained to recognize and intervene early with those who are at risk for violent behavior.

The public mental health system has sustained a period of devastating cuts over time. These cuts have been exacerbated during the Great Recession despite an increase in the demand for services for all populations, including our nation's veterans. States have cut vital services, such as community and hospital-based psychiatric care, housing, and access to medications. Looming budget cuts could lead to further cuts in services.

It is time to take action. The nation's nurses call on President Obama, Congress, and policymakers at the state and local level to take swift action to address factors that together will help prevent more senseless acts of violence. We call on policymakers to:

  • Restore access to mental health services for individuals and families
  • Increase students' access to nurses and mental health professionals from the elementary school level through college
  • Ban assault weapons and enact other meaningful gun control reforms to protect society

The nation's nurses raise our collective voice to advocate on behalf of all of those who need our care. As a nation, we must commit to ending this cycle of preventable violence, death, and trauma. We must turn our grief into action.

Alabama State Nurses Association

American Academy of Nursing

American Nurses Association

American Psychiatric Nurses Association

ANA-Illinois

ANA-New York

ANA-Michigan/RN-AIM

Arizona Nurses Association

Arkansas Nurses Association

Association of Nurses in AIDS Care

Association of Women's Health, Obstetric and Neonatal Nurses

Colorado Nurses Association

Connecticut Nurses' Association

Delaware Nurses Association

Infusion Nurses Society

Louisiana State Nurses Association

Massachusetts Association of Registered Nurses

Minnesota Organization of Registered Nurses

Missouri Nurses Association

Montana Nurses Association

National Association of Clinical Nurse Specialists

National Association of Orthopaedic Nurses

National Association of School Nurses

National League for Nursing

New Hampshire Nurses' Association

New Jersey State Nurses Association

New Mexico Nurses Association

Nurses Organization of Veterans Affairs

Ohio Nurses Association

Oklahoma Nurses Association

Pennsylvania State Nurses Association

Preventive Cardiovascular Nurses Association

Rhode Island State Nurses Association

Virginia Nurses Association

Washington State Nurses Association

Wound, Ostomy and Continence Nurses Society

Congratulations! America is ranked #65 out of SEVENTY FIVE (75) listed countries... making it have the 10th highest amounts of gun-related deaths, just behind El Salvador, Jamaica, Honduras, Guatemala, Swaziland, Columbia, Brazil, Panama and Mexico!!!! And BEHIND EVERY 1st WORLD COUNRY, ALL of Europe, and almost all of our trading partners what success!

:sarcastic:[TABLE=class: wikitable sortable jquery-tablesorter]

[TR]

[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[/TR]

[TR]

[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[/TR]

[TR]

[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[/TR]

[TR]

[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[/TR]

[TR]

[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[/TR]

[TR]

[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[TD][TABLE=class: wikitable sortable jquery-tablesorter]

[TR]

[TD] El Salvador

[/TD]

[TD]50.36[/TD]

[TD]50.36[/TD]

[TD]NA[/TD]

[TD]NA[/TD]

[TD]NA[/TD]

[TD]2009[/TD]

[TD]OAS 2011[1]

[/TD]

[/TR]

[TR]

[TD] Jamaica

[/TD]

[TD]47.44[/TD]

[TD]47.44[/TD]

[TD]NA[/TD]

[TD]NA[/TD]

[TD]NA[/TD]

[TD]2009[/TD]

[TD]OAS 2011[1]

[/TD]

[/TR]

[TR]

[TD] Honduras

[/TD]

[TD]46.70

[/TD]

[TD]46.70[/TD]

[TD]NA[/TD]

[TD]NA[/TD]

[TD]NA[/TD]

[TD]2007[/TD]

[TD]OAS 2011[1]

[/TD]

[/TR]

[TR]

[TD] Guatemala

[/TD]

[TD]38.52[/TD]

[TD]38.52[/TD]

[TD]NA[/TD]

[TD]NA[/TD]

[TD]NA[/TD]

[TD]2009[/TD]

[TD]OAS 2011[1]

[/TD]

[/TR]

[TR]

[TD] Swaziland

[/TD]

[TD]37.16[/TD]

[TD]37.16[/TD]

[TD]NA[/TD]

[TD]NA[/TD]

[TD]NA[/TD]

[TD]2004[/TD]

[TD]UNODC 2006[1]

[/TD]

[/TR]

[TR]

[TD] Colombia

[/TD]

[TD]28.11[/TD]

[TD]27.10[/TD]

[TD]0.87[/TD]

[TD]0.14[/TD]

[TD]NA[/TD]

[TD]2009[/TD]

[TD]UNODC 2011 [2]

[/TD]

[/TR]

[TR]

[TD] Brazil

[/TD]

[TD]19.01[/TD]

[TD]18.10[/TD]

[TD]0.73[/TD]

[TD]0.18[/TD]

[TD]NA[/TD]

[TD]2008[/TD]

[TD]UNODC 2011[3]

[/TD]

[/TR]

[TR]

[TD] Panama

[/TD]

[TD]12.92[/TD]

[TD]12.92[/TD]

[TD]NA[/TD]

[TD]NA[/TD]

[TD]NA[/TD]

[TD]2010[/TD]

[TD]OAS 2011[1]

[/TD]

[/TR]

[TR]

[TD] Mexico

[/TD]

[TD]11.14[/TD]

[TD]10.00[/TD]

[TD]0.67[/TD]

[TD]0.47[/TD]

[TD]NA[/TD]

[TD]2010[/TD]

[TD]UNODC 2011[4]

[/TD]

[/TR]

[TR]

[TD] United States

[/TD]

[TD]10.2[/TD]

[TD]3.7[/TD]

[TD]6.1[/TD]

[TD]0.2[/TD]

[TD]0.1[/TD]

[TD]2009[/TD]

[TD]OAS 2012[5][6] (10th place in HIGHEST number of gun-related deaths.What a horrifying embarressment on the world stage and sad for our poor people!)

[/TD]

[/TR]

[TR]

[TD] Philippines

[/TD]

[TD]9.46[/TD]

[TD]9.46[/TD]

[TD]NA[/TD]

[TD]NA[/TD]

[TD]NA[/TD]

[TD]2002[/TD]

[TD]UNODC 2002[7]

[/TD]

[/TR]

[TR]

[TD] South Africa

[/TD]

[TD]9.41[/TD]

[TD]NA[/TD]

[TD]NA[/TD]

[TD]NA[/TD]

[TD]NA[/TD]

[TD]2012[/TD]

[TD]UNODC 2012[8] & Stats SA[9]

[/TD]

[/TR]

[TR]

[TD] Montenegro

[/TD]

[TD]8.55[/TD]

[TD]2.06[/TD]

[TD]6.49[/TD]

[TD]NA[/TD]

[TD]NA[/TD]

[TD]2009[/TD]

[TD]WHO 2012[10]

[/TD]

[/TR]

[TR]

[TD] Paraguay

[/TD]

[TD]7.35[/TD]

[TD]7.35[/TD]

[TD]NA[/TD]

[TD]NA[/TD]

[TD]NA[/TD]

[TD]2000[/TD]

[TD]UNODC 2000[11]

[/TD]

[/TR]

[TR]

[TD] Nicaragua

[/TD]

[TD]7.14[/TD]

[TD]7.14[/TD]

[TD]NA[/TD]

[TD]NA[/TD]

[TD]NA[/TD]

[TD]2007[/TD]

[TD]OAS 2011[1]

[/TD]

[/TR]

[TR]

[TD] Argentina

[/TD]

[TD]5.65[/TD]

[TD]3.00[/TD]

[TD]2.01[/TD]

[TD]0.64[/TD]

[TD]NA[/TD]

[TD]2001 2008[/TD]

[TD]UNODC 2011[12]

[/TD]

[/TR]

[TR]

[TD] Canada

[/TD]

[TD]4.78[/TD]

[TD]0.76[/TD]

[TD]3.72[/TD]

[TD]0.22[/TD]

[TD]NA[/TD]

[TD]1992[/TD]

[TD]Krug 1998[13]

[/TD]

[/TR]

[TR]

[TD] Zimbabwe

[/TD]

[TD]4.75[/TD]

[TD]4.75[/TD]

[TD]NA[/TD]

[TD]NA[/TD]

[TD]NA[/TD]

[TD]2000[/TD]

[TD]UNODC 2000[11]

[/TD]

[/TR]

[TR]

[TD] Serbia

[/TD]

[TD]3.90[/TD]

[TD]0.62[/TD]

[TD]2.81[/TD]

[TD]0.18[/TD]

[TD]0.29[/TD]

[TD]2010[/TD]

[TD]WHO 2012[10]

[/TD]

[/TR]

[TR]

[TD] Finland

[/TD]

[TD]3.64[/TD]

[TD]0.26[/TD]

[TD]3.34[/TD]

[TD]0.02[/TD]

[TD]0.02[/TD]

[TD]2010[/TD]

[TD]WHO 2012[10]

[/TD]

[/TR]

[TR]

[TD] Switzerland

[/TD]

[TD]3.5[/TD]

[TD]0.52[/TD]

[TD]3.15[/TD]

[TD]0.10[/TD]

[TD]0.07[/TD]

[TD]2010[/TD]

[TD]OAS 2011[1]

[/TD]

[/TR]

[TR]

[TD] Costa Rica

[/TD]

[TD]3.32[/TD]

[TD]3.32[/TD]

[TD]NA[/TD]

[TD]NA[/TD]

[TD]NA[/TD]

[TD]2002[/TD]

[TD]UNODC 2002[7]

[/TD]

[/TR]

[TR]

[TD] Uruguay

[/TD]

[TD]3.24[/TD]

[TD]3.24[/TD]

[TD]NA[/TD]

[TD]NA[/TD]

[TD]NA[/TD]

[TD]2002[/TD]

[TD]UNODC 2002[7]

[/TD]

[/TR]

[TR]

[TD] Croatia

[/TD]

[TD]3.01[/TD]

[TD]0.57[/TD]

[TD]2.35[/TD]

[TD]0.07[/TD]

[TD]0.02[/TD]

[TD]2010[/TD]

[TD]WHO 2012[10]

[/TD]

[/TR]

[TR]

[TD] Barbados

[/TD]

[TD]3[/TD]

[TD]3[/TD]

[TD]NA[/TD]

[TD]NA[/TD]

[TD]NA[/TD]

[TD]2000[/TD]

[TD]UNODC 2000[11]

[/TD]

[/TR]

[TR]

[TD] France

[/TD]

[TD]3.00[/TD]

[TD]0.22[/TD]

[TD]2.33[/TD]

[TD]0.05[/TD]

[TD]0.41[/TD]

[TD]2009[/TD]

[TD]WHO 2012[10]

[/TD]

[/TR]

[TR]

[TD] Austria

[/TD]

[TD]2.94[/TD]

[TD]0.18[/TD]

[TD]2.68[/TD]

[TD]NA[/TD]

[TD]0.08[/TD]

[TD]2010[/TD]

[TD]WHO 2012[10]

[/TD]

[/TR]

[TR]

[TD] New Zealand

[/TD]

[TD]2.66[/TD]

[TD]0.17[/TD]

[TD]2.14[/TD]

[TD]0.09[/TD]

[TD]NA[/TD]

[TD]1993[/TD]

[TD]Krug 1998[13]

[/TD]

[/TR]

[TR]

[TD] Estonia

[/TD]

[TD]2.54[/TD]

[TD]0.30[/TD]

[TD]1.57[/TD]

[TD]0.07[/TD]

[TD]0.60[/TD]

[TD]2010[/TD]

[TD]WHO 2012[10]

[/TD]

[/TR]

[TR]

[TD] Slovenia

[/TD]

[TD]2.44[/TD]

[TD]0.05[/TD]

[TD]2.34[/TD]

[TD]NA[/TD]

[TD]0.05[/TD]

[TD]2010[/TD]

[TD]WHO 2012[10]

[/TD]

[/TR]

[TR]

[TD] Belgium

[/TD]

[TD]2.43[/TD]

[TD]0.29[/TD]

[TD]1.96[/TD]

[TD]0.01[/TD]

[TD]0.16[/TD]

[TD]2006[/TD]

[TD]WHO 2012[10]

[/TD]

[/TR]

[TR]

[TD] Malta

[/TD]

[TD]2.16[/TD]

[TD]0.48[/TD]

[TD]1.68[/TD]

[TD]NA[/TD]

[TD]NA[/TD]

[TD]2010[/TD]

[TD]WHO 2012[10]

[/TD]

[/TR]

[TR]

[TD] Peru

[/TD]

[TD]1.87[/TD]

[TD]1.87[/TD]

[TD]NA[/TD]

[TD]NA[/TD]

[TD]NA[/TD]

[TD]2009[/TD]

[TD]OAS 2011[1]

[/TD]

[/TR]

[TR]

[TD] Israel

[/TD]

[TD]1.86[/TD]

[TD]0.94[/TD]

[TD]0.71[/TD]

[TD]0.03[/TD]

[TD]0.19[/TD]

[TD]2009[/TD]

[TD]WHO 2012[10]

[/TD]

[/TR]

[TR]

[TD] Republic of Macedonia

[/TD]

[TD]1.04[/TD]

[TD]0.45[/TD]

[TD]0.42[/TD]

[TD]0.08[/TD]

[TD]0.08[/TD]

[TD]2011[/TD]

[TD]WHO 2012[10]

[/TD]

[/TR]

[TR]

[TD] Luxembourg

[/TD]

[TD]1.81[/TD]

[TD]0.60[/TD]

[TD]1.00[/TD]

[TD]NA[/TD]

[TD]0.20[/TD]

[TD]2009[/TD]

[TD]WHO 2012[10]

[/TD]

[/TR]

[TR]

[TD] Norway

[/TD]

[TD]1.78[/TD]

[TD]0.04[/TD]

[TD]1.72[/TD]

[TD]0.02[/TD]

[TD]NA[/TD]

[TD]2010[/TD]

[TD]WHO 2012[10]

[/TD]

[/TR]

[TR]

[TD] Portugal

[/TD]

[TD]1.77[/TD]

[TD]0.48[/TD]

[TD]1.09[/TD]

[TD]0.02[/TD]

[TD]0.18[/TD]

[TD]2010[/TD]

[TD]WHO 2012[10]

[/TD]

[/TR]

[TR]

[TD] Czech Republic

[/TD]

[TD]1.76[/TD]

[TD]0.12[/TD]

[TD]1.39[/TD]

[TD]0.10[/TD]

[TD]0.15[/TD]

[TD]2010[/TD]

[TD]WHO 2012[10]

[/TD]

[/TR]

[TR]

[TD] Slovakia

[/TD]

[TD]1.75[/TD]

[TD]0.18[/TD]

[TD]0.94[/TD]

[TD]0.39[/TD]

[TD]0.24[/TD]

[TD]2010[/TD]

[TD]WHO 2012[10]

[/TD]

[/TR]

[TR]

[TD] Lithuania

[/TD]

[TD]1.61[/TD]

[TD]0.24[/TD]

[TD]1.00[/TD]

[TD]0.03[/TD]

[TD]0.33[/TD]

[TD]2010[/TD]

[TD]WHO 2012[10]

[/TD]

[/TR]

[TR]

[TD] Georgia

[/TD]

[TD]1.54[/TD]

[TD]0.23[/TD]

[TD]0.09[/TD]

[TD]1.00[/TD]

[TD]0.23[/TD]

[TD]2009[/TD]

[TD]WHO 2012[10]

[/TD]

[/TR]

[TR]

[TD] Greece

[/TD]

[TD]1.5[/TD]

[TD]0.59[/TD]

[TD]0.84[/TD]

[TD]0.04[/TD]

[TD]NA[/TD]

[TD]1994[/TD]

[TD]Krug 1998[13]

[/TD]

[/TR]

[TR]

[TD] Sweden

[/TD]

[TD]1.47[/TD]

[TD]0.19[/TD]

[TD]1.20[/TD]

[TD]0.06[/TD]

[TD]0.01[/TD]

[TD]2010[/TD]

[TD]WHO 2012[10]

[/TD]

[/TR]

[TR]

[TD] Denmark

[/TD]

[TD]1.45[/TD]

[TD]0.22[/TD]

[TD]1.16[/TD]

[TD]0.04[/TD]

[TD]0.04[/TD]

[TD]2006[/TD]

[TD]WHO 2012[10]

[/TD]

[/TR]

[TR]

[TD] Latvia

[/TD]

[TD]1.43[/TD]

[TD]0.18[/TD]

[TD]0.94[/TD]

[TD]0.04[/TD]

[TD]0.27[/TD]

[TD]2010[/TD]

[TD]WHO 2012[10]

[/TD]

[/TR]

[TR]

[TD] Bulgaria

[/TD]

[TD]1.35[/TD]

[TD]0.23[/TD]

[TD]0.87[/TD]

[TD]0.14[/TD]

[TD]0.11[/TD]

[TD]2011[/TD]

[TD]WHO 2012[10]

[/TD]

[/TR]

[TR]

[TD] Italy

[/TD]

[TD]1.28[/TD]

[TD]0.36[/TD]

[TD]0.81[/TD]

[TD]0.08[/TD]

[TD]0.03[/TD]

[TD]2009[/TD]

[TD]WHO 2012[10]

[/TD]

[/TR]

[TR]

[TD] Kuwait

[/TD]

[TD]1.25[/TD]

[TD]0.36[/TD]

[TD]0.06[/TD]

[TD]0[/TD]

[TD]NA[/TD]

[TD]1995[/TD]

[TD]Krug 1998[13]

[/TD]

[/TR]

[TR]

[TD] Iceland

[/TD]

[TD]1.25[/TD]

[TD]NA[/TD]

[TD]1.25[/TD]

[TD]NA[/TD]

[TD]NA[/TD]

[TD]2009[/TD]

[TD]WHO 2012[10]

[/TD]

[/TR]

[TR]

[TD] Germany

[/TD]

[TD]1.10[/TD]

[TD]0.06[/TD]

[TD]0.94[/TD]

[TD]0.02[/TD]

[TD]0.08[/TD]

[TD]2010[/TD]

[TD]WHO 2012[10]

[/TD]

[/TR]

[TR]

[TD] Moldova

[/TD]

[TD]1.04[/TD]

[TD]1.04[/TD]

[TD]NA[/TD]

[TD]NA[/TD]

[TD]NA[/TD]

[TD]2011[/TD]

[TD]WHO 2012[10]

[/TD]

[/TR]

[TR]

[TD] Australia

[/TD]

[TD]1.05[/TD]

[TD]0.09[/TD]

[TD]0.79[/TD]

[TD]0.02[/TD]

[TD]0.15[/TD]

[TD]2008[/TD]

[TD]UNODC 2011[14]

[/TD]

[/TR]

[TR]

[TD] Ireland

[/TD]

[TD]1.03[/TD]

[TD]0.36[/TD]

[TD]0.56[/TD]

[TD]0.04[/TD]

[TD]0.07[/TD]

[TD]2010[/TD]

[TD]WHO 2012[10]

[/TD]

[/TR]

[TR]

[TD] Kyrgyzstan

[/TD]

[TD]1.01[/TD]

[TD]0.53[/TD]

[TD]0.07[/TD]

[TD]0.28[/TD]

[TD]0.13[/TD]

[TD]2010[/TD]

[TD]WHO 2012[10]

[/TD]

[/TR]

[TR]

[TD] India

[/TD]

[TD]0.93[/TD]

[TD]0.93[/TD]

[TD]NA[/TD]

[TD]NA[/TD]

[TD]NA[/TD]

[TD]2000[/TD]

[TD]UNODC 2000[11]

[/TD]

[/TR]

[TR]

[TD] Hungary

[/TD]

[TD]0.85[/TD]

[TD]0.13[/TD]

[TD]0.72[/TD]

[TD]NA[/TD]

[TD]NA[/TD]

[TD]2009[/TD]

[TD]WHO 2012[10]

[/TD]

[/TR]

[TR]

[TD] Cyprus

[/TD]

[TD]0.83[/TD]

[TD]0.24[/TD]

[TD]0.48[/TD]

[TD]NA[/TD]

[TD]0.11[/TD]

[TD]2010[/TD]

[TD]WHO 2012[10]

[/TD]

[/TR]

[TR]

[TD] Uzbekistan

[/TD]

[TD]0.68[/TD]

[TD]0.58[/TD]

[TD]0.03[/TD]

[TD]NA[/TD]

[TD]0.08[/TD]

[TD]2005[/TD]

[TD]WHO 2012[10]

[/TD]

[/TR]

[TR]

[TD] Spain

[/TD]

[TD]0.63[/TD]

[TD]0.15[/TD]

[TD]0.42[/TD]

[TD]0.05[/TD]

[TD]0.01[/TD]

[TD]2010[/TD]

[TD]WHO 2012[10]

[/TD]

[/TR]

[TR]

[TD] Netherlands

[/TD]

[TD]0.46[/TD]

[TD]0.20[/TD]

[TD]0.24[/TD]

[TD]0.01[/TD]

[TD]0.01[/TD]

[TD]2010[/TD]

[TD]WHO 2012[10]

[/TD]

[/TR]

[TR]

[TD] Taiwan

[/TD]

[TD]0.42[/TD]

[TD]0.13[/TD]

[TD]0.12[/TD]

[TD]0.11[/TD]

[TD]NA[/TD]

[TD]1994[/TD]

[TD]Krug 1998[13]

[/TD]

[/TR]

[TR]

[TD] Belarus

[/TD]

[TD]0.38[/TD]

[TD]0.38[/TD]

[TD]NA[/TD]

[TD]NA[/TD]

[TD]NA[/TD]

[TD]2002[/TD]

[TD]UNODC 2002[7]

[/TD]

[/TR]

[TR]

[TD] Ukraine

[/TD]

[TD]0.35[/TD]

[TD]0.35[/TD]

[TD]NA[/TD]

[TD]NA[/TD]

[TD]NA[/TD]

[TD]2000[/TD]

[TD]UNODC 2000[11]

[/TD]

[/TR]

[TR]

[TD] United Kingdom

[/TD]

[TD]0.25[/TD]

[TD]0.04[/TD]

[TD]0.17[/TD]

[TD]0.01[/TD]

[TD]0.02[/TD]

[TD]2011[/TD]

[TD]WHO2012 [10]

[/TD]

[/TR]

[TR]

[TD] Poland

[/TD]

[TD]0.26[/TD]

[TD]0.02[/TD]

[TD]0.12[/TD]

[TD]0.02[/TD]

[TD]0.09[/TD]

[TD]2010[/TD]

[TD]WHO 2012[10]

[/TD]

[/TR]

[TR]

[TD] Singapore

[/TD]

[TD]0.24[/TD]

[TD]0.07[/TD]

[TD]0.17[/TD]

[TD]0[/TD]

[TD]NA[/TD]

[TD]1994[/TD]

[TD]Krug 1998[13]

[/TD]

[/TR]

[TR]

[TD] Romania

[/TD]

[TD]0.20[/TD]

[TD]0.04[/TD]

[TD]0.06[/TD]

[TD]0.09[/TD]

[TD]0.01[/TD]

[TD]2010[/TD]

[TD]WHO 2012[10]

[/TD]

[/TR]

[TR]

[TD] Hong Kong

[/TD]

[TD]0.19[/TD]

[TD]0.12[/TD]

[TD]0.07[/TD]

[TD]0[/TD]

[TD]NA[/TD]

[TD]1993[/TD]

[TD]Krug 1998[13]

[/TD]

[/TR]

[TR]

[TD] Mauritius

[/TD]

[TD]0.19[/TD]

[TD]0[/TD]

[TD]0.09[/TD]

[TD]0.09[/TD]

[TD]NA[/TD]

[TD]1993[/TD]

[TD]Krug 1998[13]

[/TD]

[/TR]

[TR]

[TD] Qatar

[/TD]

[TD]0.18[/TD]

[TD]0.18[/TD]

[TD]NA[/TD]

[TD]NA[/TD]

[TD]NA[/TD]

[TD]2000[/TD]

[TD]UNODC 2000[11]

[/TD]

[/TR]

[TR]

[TD] South Korea

[/TD]

[TD]0.13[/TD]

[TD]0.04[/TD]

[TD]0.02[/TD]

[TD]0.05[/TD]

[TD]NA[/TD]

[TD]1994[/TD]

[TD]Krug 1998[13]

[/TD]

[/TR]

[TR]

[TD] Japan

[/TD]

[TD]0.07[/TD]

[TD]0.02[/TD]

[TD]0.04[/TD]

[TD]0[/TD]

[TD]NA[/TD]

[TD]1994[/TD]

[TD]Krug 1998[13]

[/TD]

[/TR]

[TR]

[TD] Azerbaijan

[/TD]

[TD]0.07[/TD]

[TD]0.04[/TD]

[TD]0.01[/TD]

[TD]0.02[/TD]

[TD]NA[/TD]

[TD]2007[/TD]

[TD]WHO 2012[10]

[/TD]

[/TR]

[TR]

[TD] Chile

[/TD]

[TD]0.06[/TD]

[TD]0.06[/TD]

[TD]NA[/TD]

[TD]NA[/TD]

[TD]NA[/TD]

[TD]2002[/TD]

[TD]UNODC 2002[7]

[/TD]

[/TR]

[/TABLE]

[/TD]

[/TR]

[TR]

[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[/TR]

[TR]

[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[TD][/url]

[/TD]

[/TR]

[TR]

[TD]

[/TD]

[/TR]

[/TABLE]

10.2 (ours) vs the lowest .06 (Chile)... which makes ours ONE HUNDRED SEVENTY (170) TIMES HIGHER! And while the entire European Union (500 million people and 27 countries) had only 1,260 murders by guns... the United States (only 300 million compared to 500 million) had 10,801!!!!!! http://www.fox.temple.edu/cms/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/JeanLemaire.pdf That is nearly 10 times higher.

Atleast someone is doing something about this atrocity against humanity.

"There is a definite need to control handgun use and the accompanying violence that leads individuals to use handguns. ANA supports both the waiting period for the purchase of handguns and a ban on the sale of all assault weapons.

Firearms, especially handguns, remain a leading instrument of violent injury. As the largest single group of clinical health care professionals within the health system, licensed registered nurses are on the front lines of the health care system and witness first hand the devastation from the injuries sustained as a result of gun violence."

The American Nursing Association, letter to the 112th Congress http://www.nursingworld.org/GunControl-112thCongress.aspx

Accross the border in Canada, nurses are doing the something about this cruel atrocity, too.

"A core purpose of the Canadian Federation of Nurses Unions (CFNU) is to be a proactive,

unifying national voice for the socio-economic welfare of nurses and others.

Health promotion is a key role of nurses. Gun control legislation works to prevent injury and death

and can therefore be likened to other injury and death prevention policies such as seatbelts or

hockey helmets. As well, gun control is a women’s issue as it reduces the risk of spousal

homicide, intimidation and injury. 93% of our members are women.

For nurses, firearms control, including the long-gun registry, is not a north/south or rural/urban

issue. Gun control is a health and safety issue and it is a gender issue.

As health professionals, we know the importance of investing in prevention, whether in road

safety or prevention of infectious diseases. It is true that one cannot easily measure prevention, but

we can certainly measure the effects of ignoring it. To our knowledge, six different coroners’

inquests recommended the licensing of gun owners and registration of all firearms. Indeed, our

daily practice informs us of the very real risks associated with firearms and of the value of a strong

gun control law.

Health Promotion and Prevention

Over 70% of deaths from firearms are suicides.

ï‚· Most deaths by firearms and suicides are committed with shotguns or rifles.

ï‚· The progress made over the past 15 years in the field of suicide prevention is enormous.

ï‚· Many suicide deaths are preventable.

ï‚· Reduced access to certain methods of suicide and preventive actions with vulnerable people

are important measures as part of a strategy for suicide prevention.

ï‚· The registration of firearms, requiring licenses renewable every five years for gun owners and

background checks, as well as efforts to raise awareness of safe storage of firearms have been

recognized for their impact in significantly decreased suicide rates.

Reducing Violence Against Women

ï‚· 72% of women who die from gun shot wounds in Canada are shot with long guns and rifles.

Guns in the home is a risk factor for spousal homicide, whether long guns or handguns.

Spousal homicides with guns have fallen since gun control legislation in the 1990s by two

thirds, whereas spousal homicides without guns have remained the same.

 When a gun is involved in domestic violence, the chance of a woman’s death increases by 12

times compared to other forms of violence.

ï‚· Women who live with a gun in their home are more likely to be shot and killed than those who

live in gun-free homes. Even if the guns are not directly fired on women, they are often used as

a tool of intimidation in rape, or physical or psychological violence."

The Canadian Federation of Nurses Unions, letter to the Canadian Senate Standing Committee

on Legal and Constitutional Affairs http://www.nursesunions.ca/sites/default/files/gun_control_statement_march_28_2012.pdf

[h=1](old, but interesting) Mrs. McCarthy Goes to Washington: Nurse Takes Gun-Control Crusade to Congress as a U.S. Representative[/h]"...Congresswoman McCarthy is fully aware that the legislation she either proposes or supports directly impacts those who work on the front lines of health care. She has proposed legislation that seeks to protect healthcare workers, such as the Health Care Worker Protection Act, which requires hospitals to use safer needles and find money for safe training. The Health Care Worker Protection Act recently passed the House.

...Her accomplishments notwithstanding, she will not consider her mission complete until every citizen is safe from gun violence. For her efforts, she has received many honors, which are listed on her official Congressional Web site (Congresswoman Carolyn McCarthy : Home). She was named one of New York Newsday’s 100 Long Island Influentials, Congressional Quarterly’s 50 Most Effective Legislators in Congress, one of Redbook Magazine’s nine Mothers and Shakers, Ladies’ Home Journal list of America’s 100 Most Important Women and Advertising Age’s list of Most Impact by Women in 1999." Mrs. McCarthy Goes to Washington: Nurse Takes Gun-Control Crusade to Congress as a U.S. Representative - NurseZone

[h=1][/h]

Specializes in Hospice / Psych / RNAC.

We can have all the rules and what not in our society on how kids do this and that; what makes them violent, which generation is better, how guns are bad, etc... but ultimately it starts with the parents at home. With over 50% of kids growing up in single parent families what leads to the center of the problem is clear to me.

Is it the video games or is it a coincidence that the divorce rate and teenage pregnancy was on the rise at the same time more or less? Also, the fact that more parents are reluctant to let their kids play outside unsupervised for fear of never seeing them again with all the disappearing children on the increase. Young kids coming home to empty houses due to parent/parents working.

Is crime on the rise or is it now with advanced technology in place how we are able to hear about every gruesome crime at the exact time it happens just by turning on the TV, radio, or computer? 50 years ago unless we were related to the family members or in the state we wouldn't have heard of nearly any of the stuff we do today.

It isn't just this generation or the other but all generations had parents trying to act like friends to their kids instead of actual parents. I believe it started witht the increasing divorce rate. Everyone has their opinions and everyone has their own particular soapbox but that doesn't make the next persons any less important. It starts in the home with the aid and access to education of mental health for everyone, including kids (right along with drug and alcohol education), and taking responsibility for each one's children.

With over 70% of all gun deaths attributed to suicide (InfirmiereJolie) that is very telling. It tells me that gun control isn't the issue; the issue is mental health and home life. You know if they didn't have a gun they would have more then likely killed themselves in another way. Mental health has always taken a back seat to most things, it's time to bring it to the front of the room. When listening to the POTUS promoting his health care bill, I never heard him speak about mental health.

It's time.

Well as a nurse all I have to say on this is the day they come for my guns is the day I end up dying more than likely. I will fight anyone that tries totake them away from me. Thankfully though that will not happen as NONE of my guns are registered and I do own quite a few guns including the oh so scary M 4 Bushmaster in bothlong version and theshortversionthat is considereda pistol. Even scarier I own a preban Uzi That is full auto. I even have silencers for a couple of my pistols as well as for the Bushmaster.

p.s they all are (gasp!) kept loaded

ActuallyI need to amend on part of my post, my Uzi is registered, but that is the only one registered.

... The dreaded double post....

We can have all the rules and what not in our society on how kids do this and that; what makes them violent, which generation is better, how guns are bad, etc... but ultimately it starts with the parents at home. With over 50% of kids growing up in single parent families what leads to the center of the problem is clear to me.

Is it the video games or is it a coincidence that the divorce rate and teenage pregnancy was on the rise at the same time more or less? Also, the fact that more parents are reluctant to let their kids play outside unsupervised for fear of never seeing them again with all the disappearing children on the increase. Young kids coming home to empty houses due to parent/parents working.

Is crime on the rise or is it now with advanced technology in place how we are able to hear about every gruesome crime at the exact time it happens just by turning on the TV, radio, or computer? 50 years ago unless we were related to the family members or in the state we wouldn't have heard of nearly any of the stuff we do today.

It isn't just this generation or the other but all generations had parents trying to act like friends to their kids instead of actual parents. I believe it started witht the increasing divorce rate. Everyone has their opinions and everyone has their own particular soapbox but that doesn't make the next persons any less important. It starts in the home with the aid and access to education of mental health for everyone, including kids (right along with drug and alcohol education), and taking responsibility for each one's children.

With over 70% of all gun deaths attributed to suicide (InfirmiereJolie) that is very telling. It tells me that gun control isn't the issue; the issue is mental health and home life. You know if they didn't have a gun they would have more then likely killed themselves in another way. Mental health has always taken a back seat to most things, it's time to bring it to the front of the room. When listening to the POTUS promoting his health care bill, I never heard him speak about mental health.

It's time.

I agree with a lot of points in your post. However, in this day and age most parents DO have to work to even make ends meet in today's society. And parents divorce. It is not ideal, but certainly the time of "staying married for the kids" is not always the best choice. There are many, many single parents who raise successful and well adjusted kids. There are many parents who divorce due to the pressure of raising a child with profound difficulties. Hence why the more support we can give the better. Single parents with readily available resources or divorced parents with resources will net better results. Back in the day when Moms stayed home and Dads worked sometimes 2 jobs, and it is akin to being a single parent. And as noted in a previous post, parents need to know that they can take control of their children, and that is what is sorely lacking.

Tyvin, I was raised by a single parent and never smoked, never drank, never broke the law... received many awards in school "Star Student, ect" never bullied anyone (as far as I know), good to my friends and others, was involved in sports, dance, and many other EC's, worked since 14 in various part time jobs, graduated and went to college with scholarships.... got a 4.0 in college, took leadership positions in student organizations, volunteered, ect. All it takes is one good person (you actually do not need two)... or better yet, one's OWN will, determination, ambition, and hard work.

Single parenthood has nothing to do with well... anything (negative that is). The president was practically raised completely by his mother, practically a single parent from the get-go. There are many with this same story. Even more dramatic... I know people who had practically no parents at all and are doing just fine on their own. I can think of examples where people decide to not follow their family's footsteps. Why does this happen? Clearly it's due to a person's own free will - their ability to make their own choices of how they are going to live their lives. People control themselves and their actions. They are their own keepers. It is "I can because I want to" not "I can because someone tells me I can."

Genetics, home life, socioeconomic situation, geographic location (in America i.e.,) has nothing to do with what path a person ultimately chooses for themselves - it is their own free will and self-control. It is their choice.

(on separate subject in post, last par)...Actually, if you look at research on it... people are LESS likely to sadly and impulsively (which it usually is, contrary to some belief) make a snap decision when guns are not accessible. They also have a higher survival rate if they try. Pg 10 by Jean Lemaire, The Journal of Risk and Insurance... "The unavailability of a firearm then would reduce the fatality rate of firearm suicides from 96.5 percent to 22.42 percent [overall] for males, and from 96 percent to 5.99 percent [overall] for females" http://www.fox.temple.edu/cms/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/JeanLemaire.pdf (note, he is taking into account other methods and substitution).

This is like putting seat belts into a car.

((At least the American Nursing Association, Canadian Federation for Nursing Unions, and the Nurse/Congresswoman Carolyn McCarthy recognize this and are making a difference re D.C. lawmaking))

We can have all the rules and what not in our society on how kids do this and that; what makes them violent, which generation is better, how guns are bad, etc... but ultimately it starts with the parents at home. With over 50% of kids growing up in single parent families what leads to the center of the problem is clear to me.

Is it the video games or is it a coincidence that the divorce rate and teenage pregnancy was on the rise at the same time more or less? Also, the fact that more parents are reluctant to let their kids play outside unsupervised for fear of never seeing them again with all the disappearing children on the increase. Young kids coming home to empty houses due to parent/parents working.

Is crime on the rise or is it now with advanced technology in place how we are able to hear about every gruesome crime at the exact time it happens just by turning on the TV, radio, or computer? 50 years ago unless we were related to the family members or in the state we wouldn't have heard of nearly any of the stuff we do today.

It isn't just this generation or the other but all generations had parents trying to act like friends to their kids instead of actual parents. I believe it started witht the increasing divorce rate. Everyone has their opinions and everyone has their own particular soapbox but that doesn't make the next persons any less important. It starts in the home with the aid and access to education of mental health for everyone, including kids (right along with drug and alcohol education), and taking responsibility for each one's children.

With over 70% of all gun deaths attributed to suicide (InfirmiereJolie) that is very telling. It tells me that gun control isn't the issue; the issue is mental health and home life. You know if they didn't have a gun they would have more then likely killed themselves in another way. Mental health has always taken a back seat to most things, it's time to bring it to the front of the room. When listening to the POTUS promoting his health care bill, I never heard him speak about mental health.

It's time.

Well as a nurse all I have to say on this is the day they come for my guns is the day I end up dying more than likely. I will fight anyone that tries totake them away from me. Thankfully though that will not happen as NONE of my guns are registered and I do own quite a few guns including the oh so scary M 4 Bushmaster in bothlong version and theshortversionthat is considereda pistol. Even scarier I own a preban Uzi That is full auto. I even have silencers for a couple of my pistols as well as for the Bushmaster.

p.s they all are (gasp!) kept loaded

This is exactly why guns are harmful - they propel an "all or nothing" attitude... 100% success or 100% failure, alive or dead... false dilemma fallacy... as seen in this post.

People are so blind, they cannot see it... There has to be something done. At 30,000 gun-related deaths a year this adds up to 2,370,000 deaths (times 79, 2012-1933) since 1933 (first year it was recorded). This is as large as to be called genocide... a strong and suitable word for a horrific, atrocious amount.... When people look at this number or anything related to gun-deaths, they just bat their eye, as if it was nothing. Any statistics, any graphs, any facts, any comparisions to ourselves to countries around the world.. the 65 countries leading us in managing this, goes in one ear... and out another...

Also, re: registration... In Canada all long guns are required to be registered... this is one thing the Canadian Federation of Nursing Unions is strongly supporting in the previous post with persuasive and masterful ethos, pathos, and logos.

Specializes in Critical care.
r)

Also, re: registration... In Canada all long guns are required to be registered... this is one thing the Canadian Federation of Nursing Unions is strongly supporting in the previous post with persuasive and masterful ethos, pathos, and logos.

Ah ,the lovely Canadian gun registry. Perhaps you'd be interested to know that the gun registry has been dismantled due to it's resounding failure and unjustified expense.

Specializes in Trauma.
Congratulations! America is ranked #65 out of SEVENTY FIVE (75) listed countries... making it have the 10th highest amounts of gun-related deaths, just behind El Salvador, Jamaica, Honduras, Guatemala, Swaziland, Columbia, Brazil, Panama and Mexico!!!! And BEHIND EVERY 1st WORLD COUNRY, ALL of Europe, and almost all of our trading partners what success!

:sarcastic:[TABLE=class: wikitable sortable jquery-tablesorter]

[TR]

[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[/TR]

[TR]

[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[/TR]

[TR]

[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[/TR]

[TR]

[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[/TR]

[TR]

[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[/TR]

[TR]

[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[TD][TABLE=class: wikitable sortable jquery-tablesorter]

[TR]

[TD] El Salvador[/TD]

[TD]50.36[/TD]

[TD]50.36[/TD]

[TD]NA[/TD]

[TD]NA[/TD]

[TD]NA[/TD]

[TD]2009[/TD]

[TD]OAS 2011[1][/TD]

[/TR]

[TR]

[TD] Jamaica[/TD]

[TD]47.44[/TD]

[TD]47.44[/TD]

[TD]NA[/TD]

[TD]NA[/TD]

[TD]NA[/TD]

[TD]2009[/TD]

[TD]OAS 2011[1][/TD]

[/TR]

[TR]

[TD] Honduras[/TD]

[TD]46.70[/TD]

[TD]46.70[/TD]

[TD]NA[/TD]

[TD]NA[/TD]

[TD]NA[/TD]

[TD]2007[/TD]

[TD]OAS 2011[1][/TD]

[/TR]

[TR]

[TD] Guatemala[/TD]

[TD]38.52[/TD]

[TD]38.52[/TD]

[TD]NA[/TD]

[TD]NA[/TD]

[TD]NA[/TD]

[TD]2009[/TD]

[TD]OAS 2011[1][/TD]

[/TR]

[TR]

[TD] Swaziland[/TD]

[TD]37.16[/TD]

[TD]37.16[/TD]

[TD]NA[/TD]

[TD]NA[/TD]

[TD]NA[/TD]

[TD]2004[/TD]

[TD]UNODC 2006[1][/TD]

[/TR]

[TR]

[TD] Colombia[/TD]

[TD]28.11[/TD]

[TD]27.10[/TD]

[TD]0.87[/TD]

[TD]0.14[/TD]

[TD]NA[/TD]

[TD]2009[/TD]

[TD]UNODC 2011 [2][/TD]

[/TR]

[TR]

[TD] Brazil[/TD]

[TD]19.01[/TD]

[TD]18.10[/TD]

[TD]0.73[/TD]

[TD]0.18[/TD]

[TD]NA[/TD]

[TD]2008[/TD]

[TD]UNODC 2011[3][/TD]

[/TR]

[TR]

[TD] Panama[/TD]

[TD]12.92[/TD]

[TD]12.92[/TD]

[TD]NA[/TD]

[TD]NA[/TD]

[TD]NA[/TD]

[TD]2010[/TD]

[TD]OAS 2011[1][/TD]

[/TR]

[TR]

[TD] Mexico[/TD]

[TD]11.14[/TD]

[TD]10.00[/TD]

[TD]0.67[/TD]

[TD]0.47[/TD]

[TD]NA[/TD]

[TD]2010[/TD]

[TD]UNODC 2011[4][/TD]

[/TR]

[TR]

[TD] United States

[/TD]

[TD]10.2[/TD]

[TD]3.7[/TD]

[TD]6.1[/TD]

[TD]0.2[/TD]

[TD]0.1[/TD]

[TD]2009[/TD]

[TD]OAS 2012[5][6] (10th place in HIGHEST number of gun-related deaths.What a horrifying embarressment on the world stage and sad for our poor people!)

[/TD]

[/TR]

[TR]

[TD] Philippines[/TD]

[TD]9.46[/TD]

[TD]9.46[/TD]

[TD]NA[/TD]

[TD]NA[/TD]

[TD]NA[/TD]

[TD]2002[/TD]

[TD]UNODC 2002[7][/TD]

[/TR]

[TR]

[TD] South Africa[/TD]

[TD]9.41[/TD]

[TD]NA[/TD]

[TD]NA[/TD]

[TD]NA[/TD]

[TD]NA[/TD]

[TD]2012[/TD]

[TD]UNODC 2012[8] & Stats SA[9][/TD]

[/TR]

[TR]

[TD] Montenegro[/TD]

[TD]8.55[/TD]

[TD]2.06[/TD]

[TD]6.49[/TD]

[TD]NA[/TD]

[TD]NA[/TD]

[TD]2009[/TD]

[TD]WHO 2012[10][/TD]

[/TR]

[TR]

[TD] Paraguay[/TD]

[TD]7.35[/TD]

[TD]7.35[/TD]

[TD]NA[/TD]

[TD]NA[/TD]

[TD]NA[/TD]

[TD]2000[/TD]

[TD]UNODC 2000[11][/TD]

[/TR]

[TR]

[TD] Nicaragua[/TD]

[TD]7.14[/TD]

[TD]7.14[/TD]

[TD]NA[/TD]

[TD]NA[/TD]

[TD]NA[/TD]

[TD]2007[/TD]

[TD]OAS 2011[1][/TD]

[/TR]

[TR]

[TD] Argentina[/TD]

[TD]5.65[/TD]

[TD]3.00[/TD]

[TD]2.01[/TD]

[TD]0.64[/TD]

[TD]NA[/TD]

[TD]2001 2008[/TD]

[TD]UNODC 2011[12][/TD]

[/TR]

[TR]

[TD] Canada[/TD]

[TD]4.78[/TD]

[TD]0.76[/TD]

[TD]3.72[/TD]

[TD]0.22[/TD]

[TD]NA[/TD]

[TD]1992[/TD]

[TD]Krug 1998[13][/TD]

[/TR]

[TR]

[TD] Zimbabwe[/TD]

[TD]4.75[/TD]

[TD]4.75[/TD]

[TD]NA[/TD]

[TD]NA[/TD]

[TD]NA[/TD]

[TD]2000[/TD]

[TD]UNODC 2000[11][/TD]

[/TR]

[TR]

[TD] Serbia[/TD]

[TD]3.90[/TD]

[TD]0.62[/TD]

[TD]2.81[/TD]

[TD]0.18[/TD]

[TD]0.29[/TD]

[TD]2010[/TD]

[TD]WHO 2012[10][/TD]

[/TR]

[TR]

[TD] Finland[/TD]

[TD]3.64[/TD]

[TD]0.26[/TD]

[TD]3.34[/TD]

[TD]0.02[/TD]

[TD]0.02[/TD]

[TD]2010[/TD]

[TD]WHO 2012[10][/TD]

[/TR]

[TR]

[TD] Switzerland[/TD]

[TD]3.5[/TD]

[TD]0.52[/TD]

[TD]3.15[/TD]

[TD]0.10[/TD]

[TD]0.07[/TD]

[TD]2010[/TD]

[TD]OAS 2011[1][/TD]

[/TR]

[TR]

[TD] Costa Rica[/TD]

[TD]3.32[/TD]

[TD]3.32[/TD]

[TD]NA[/TD]

[TD]NA[/TD]

[TD]NA[/TD]

[TD]2002[/TD]

[TD]UNODC 2002[7][/TD]

[/TR]

[TR]

[TD] Uruguay[/TD]

[TD]3.24[/TD]

[TD]3.24[/TD]

[TD]NA[/TD]

[TD]NA[/TD]

[TD]NA[/TD]

[TD]2002[/TD]

[TD]UNODC 2002[7][/TD]

[/TR]

[TR]

[TD] Croatia[/TD]

[TD]3.01[/TD]

[TD]0.57[/TD]

[TD]2.35[/TD]

[TD]0.07[/TD]

[TD]0.02[/TD]

[TD]2010[/TD]

[TD]WHO 2012[10][/TD]

[/TR]

[TR]

[TD] Barbados[/TD]

[TD]3[/TD]

[TD]3[/TD]

[TD]NA[/TD]

[TD]NA[/TD]

[TD]NA[/TD]

[TD]2000[/TD]

[TD]UNODC 2000[11][/TD]

[/TR]

[TR]

[TD] France[/TD]

[TD]3.00[/TD]

[TD]0.22[/TD]

[TD]2.33[/TD]

[TD]0.05[/TD]

[TD]0.41[/TD]

[TD]2009[/TD]

[TD]WHO 2012[10][/TD]

[/TR]

[TR]

[TD] Austria[/TD]

[TD]2.94[/TD]

[TD]0.18[/TD]

[TD]2.68[/TD]

[TD]NA[/TD]

[TD]0.08[/TD]

[TD]2010[/TD]

[TD]WHO 2012[10][/TD]

[/TR]

[TR]

[TD] New Zealand[/TD]

[TD]2.66[/TD]

[TD]0.17[/TD]

[TD]2.14[/TD]

[TD]0.09[/TD]

[TD]NA[/TD]

[TD]1993[/TD]

[TD]Krug 1998[13][/TD]

[/TR]

[TR]

[TD] Estonia[/TD]

[TD]2.54[/TD]

[TD]0.30[/TD]

[TD]1.57[/TD]

[TD]0.07[/TD]

[TD]0.60[/TD]

[TD]2010[/TD]

[TD]WHO 2012[10][/TD]

[/TR]

[TR]

[TD] Slovenia[/TD]

[TD]2.44[/TD]

[TD]0.05[/TD]

[TD]2.34[/TD]

[TD]NA[/TD]

[TD]0.05[/TD]

[TD]2010[/TD]

[TD]WHO 2012[10][/TD]

[/TR]

[TR]

[TD] Belgium[/TD]

[TD]2.43[/TD]

[TD]0.29[/TD]

[TD]1.96[/TD]

[TD]0.01[/TD]

[TD]0.16[/TD]

[TD]2006[/TD]

[TD]WHO 2012[10][/TD]

[/TR]

[TR]

[TD] Malta[/TD]

[TD]2.16[/TD]

[TD]0.48[/TD]

[TD]1.68[/TD]

[TD]NA[/TD]

[TD]NA[/TD]

[TD]2010[/TD]

[TD]WHO 2012[10][/TD]

[/TR]

[TR]

[TD] Peru[/TD]

[TD]1.87[/TD]

[TD]1.87[/TD]

[TD]NA[/TD]

[TD]NA[/TD]

[TD]NA[/TD]

[TD]2009[/TD]

[TD]OAS 2011[1][/TD]

[/TR]

[TR]

[TD] Israel[/TD]

[TD]1.86[/TD]

[TD]0.94[/TD]

[TD]0.71[/TD]

[TD]0.03[/TD]

[TD]0.19[/TD]

[TD]2009[/TD]

[TD]WHO 2012[10][/TD]

[/TR]

[TR]

[TD] Republic of Macedonia[/TD]

[TD]1.04[/TD]

[TD]0.45[/TD]

[TD]0.42[/TD]

[TD]0.08[/TD]

[TD]0.08[/TD]

[TD]2011[/TD]

[TD]WHO 2012[10][/TD]

[/TR]

[TR]

[TD] Luxembourg[/TD]

[TD]1.81[/TD]

[TD]0.60[/TD]

[TD]1.00[/TD]

[TD]NA[/TD]

[TD]0.20[/TD]

[TD]2009[/TD]

[TD]WHO 2012[10][/TD]

[/TR]

[TR]

[TD] Norway[/TD]

[TD]1.78[/TD]

[TD]0.04[/TD]

[TD]1.72[/TD]

[TD]0.02[/TD]

[TD]NA[/TD]

[TD]2010[/TD]

[TD]WHO 2012[10][/TD]

[/TR]

[TR]

[TD] Portugal[/TD]

[TD]1.77[/TD]

[TD]0.48[/TD]

[TD]1.09[/TD]

[TD]0.02[/TD]

[TD]0.18[/TD]

[TD]2010[/TD]

[TD]WHO 2012[10][/TD]

[/TR]

[TR]

[TD] Czech Republic[/TD]

[TD]1.76[/TD]

[TD]0.12[/TD]

[TD]1.39[/TD]

[TD]0.10[/TD]

[TD]0.15[/TD]

[TD]2010[/TD]

[TD]WHO 2012[10][/TD]

[/TR]

[TR]

[TD] Slovakia[/TD]

[TD]1.75[/TD]

[TD]0.18[/TD]

[TD]0.94[/TD]

[TD]0.39[/TD]

[TD]0.24[/TD]

[TD]2010[/TD]

[TD]WHO 2012[10][/TD]

[/TR]

[TR]

[TD] Lithuania[/TD]

[TD]1.61[/TD]

[TD]0.24[/TD]

[TD]1.00[/TD]

[TD]0.03[/TD]

[TD]0.33[/TD]

[TD]2010[/TD]

[TD]WHO 2012[10][/TD]

[/TR]

[TR]

[TD] Georgia[/TD]

[TD]1.54[/TD]

[TD]0.23[/TD]

[TD]0.09[/TD]

[TD]1.00[/TD]

[TD]0.23[/TD]

[TD]2009[/TD]

[TD]WHO 2012[10][/TD]

[/TR]

[TR]

[TD] Greece[/TD]

[TD]1.5[/TD]

[TD]0.59[/TD]

[TD]0.84[/TD]

[TD]0.04[/TD]

[TD]NA[/TD]

[TD]1994[/TD]

[TD]Krug 1998[13][/TD]

[/TR]

[TR]

[TD] Sweden[/TD]

[TD]1.47[/TD]

[TD]0.19[/TD]

[TD]1.20[/TD]

[TD]0.06[/TD]

[TD]0.01[/TD]

[TD]2010[/TD]

[TD]WHO 2012[10][/TD]

[/TR]

[TR]

[TD] Denmark[/TD]

[TD]1.45[/TD]

[TD]0.22[/TD]

[TD]1.16[/TD]

[TD]0.04[/TD]

[TD]0.04[/TD]

[TD]2006[/TD]

[TD]WHO 2012[10][/TD]

[/TR]

[TR]

[TD] Latvia[/TD]

[TD]1.43[/TD]

[TD]0.18[/TD]

[TD]0.94[/TD]

[TD]0.04[/TD]

[TD]0.27[/TD]

[TD]2010[/TD]

[TD]WHO 2012[10][/TD]

[/TR]

[TR]

[TD] Bulgaria[/TD]

[TD]1.35[/TD]

[TD]0.23[/TD]

[TD]0.87[/TD]

[TD]0.14[/TD]

[TD]0.11[/TD]

[TD]2011[/TD]

[TD]WHO 2012[10][/TD]

[/TR]

[TR]

[TD] Italy[/TD]

[TD]1.28[/TD]

[TD]0.36[/TD]

[TD]0.81[/TD]

[TD]0.08[/TD]

[TD]0.03[/TD]

[TD]2009[/TD]

[TD]WHO 2012[10][/TD]

[/TR]

[TR]

[TD] Kuwait[/TD]

[TD]1.25[/TD]

[TD]0.36[/TD]

[TD]0.06[/TD]

[TD]0[/TD]

[TD]NA[/TD]

[TD]1995[/TD]

[TD]Krug 1998[13][/TD]

[/TR]

[TR]

[TD] Iceland[/TD]

[TD]1.25[/TD]

[TD]NA[/TD]

[TD]1.25[/TD]

[TD]NA[/TD]

[TD]NA[/TD]

[TD]2009[/TD]

[TD]WHO 2012[10][/TD]

[/TR]

[TR]

[TD] Germany[/TD]

[TD]1.10[/TD]

[TD]0.06[/TD]

[TD]0.94[/TD]

[TD]0.02[/TD]

[TD]0.08[/TD]

[TD]2010[/TD]

[TD]WHO 2012[10][/TD]

[/TR]

[TR]

[TD] Moldova[/TD]

[TD]1.04[/TD]

[TD]1.04[/TD]

[TD]NA[/TD]

[TD]NA[/TD]

[TD]NA[/TD]

[TD]2011[/TD]

[TD]WHO 2012[10][/TD]

[/TR]

[TR]

[TD] Australia[/TD]

[TD]1.05[/TD]

[TD]0.09[/TD]

[TD]0.79[/TD]

[TD]0.02[/TD]

[TD]0.15[/TD]

[TD]2008[/TD]

[TD]UNODC 2011[14][/TD]

[/TR]

[TR]

[TD] Ireland[/TD]

[TD]1.03[/TD]

[TD]0.36[/TD]

[TD]0.56[/TD]

[TD]0.04[/TD]

[TD]0.07[/TD]

[TD]2010[/TD]

[TD]WHO 2012[10][/TD]

[/TR]

[TR]

[TD] Kyrgyzstan[/TD]

[TD]1.01[/TD]

[TD]0.53[/TD]

[TD]0.07[/TD]

[TD]0.28[/TD]

[TD]0.13[/TD]

[TD]2010[/TD]

[TD]WHO 2012[10][/TD]

[/TR]

[TR]

[TD] India[/TD]

[TD]0.93[/TD]

[TD]0.93[/TD]

[TD]NA[/TD]

[TD]NA[/TD]

[TD]NA[/TD]

[TD]2000[/TD]

[TD]UNODC 2000[11][/TD]

[/TR]

[TR]

[TD] Hungary[/TD]

[TD]0.85[/TD]

[TD]0.13[/TD]

[TD]0.72[/TD]

[TD]NA[/TD]

[TD]NA[/TD]

[TD]2009[/TD]

[TD]WHO 2012[10][/TD]

[/TR]

[TR]

[TD] Cyprus[/TD]

[TD]0.83[/TD]

[TD]0.24[/TD]

[TD]0.48[/TD]

[TD]NA[/TD]

[TD]0.11[/TD]

[TD]2010[/TD]

[TD]WHO 2012[10][/TD]

[/TR]

[TR]

[TD] Uzbekistan[/TD]

[TD]0.68[/TD]

[TD]0.58[/TD]

[TD]0.03[/TD]

[TD]NA[/TD]

[TD]0.08[/TD]

[TD]2005[/TD]

[TD]WHO 2012[10][/TD]

[/TR]

[TR]

[TD] Spain[/TD]

[TD]0.63[/TD]

[TD]0.15[/TD]

[TD]0.42[/TD]

[TD]0.05[/TD]

[TD]0.01[/TD]

[TD]2010[/TD]

[TD]WHO 2012[10][/TD]

[/TR]

[TR]

[TD] Netherlands[/TD]

[TD]0.46[/TD]

[TD]0.20[/TD]

[TD]0.24[/TD]

[TD]0.01[/TD]

[TD]0.01[/TD]

[TD]2010[/TD]

[TD]WHO 2012[10][/TD]

[/TR]

[TR]

[TD] Taiwan[/TD]

[TD]0.42[/TD]

[TD]0.13[/TD]

[TD]0.12[/TD]

[TD]0.11[/TD]

[TD]NA[/TD]

[TD]1994[/TD]

[TD]Krug 1998[13][/TD]

[/TR]

[TR]

[TD] Belarus[/TD]

[TD]0.38[/TD]

[TD]0.38[/TD]

[TD]NA[/TD]

[TD]NA[/TD]

[TD]NA[/TD]

[TD]2002[/TD]

[TD]UNODC 2002[7][/TD]

[/TR]

[TR]

[TD] Ukraine[/TD]

[TD]0.35[/TD]

[TD]0.35[/TD]

[TD]NA[/TD]

[TD]NA[/TD]

[TD]NA[/TD]

[TD]2000[/TD]

[TD]UNODC 2000[11][/TD]

[/TR]

[TR]

[TD] United Kingdom[/TD]

[TD]0.25[/TD]

[TD]0.04[/TD]

[TD]0.17[/TD]

[TD]0.01[/TD]

[TD]0.02[/TD]

[TD]2011[/TD]

[TD]WHO2012 [10][/TD]

[/TR]

[TR]

[TD] Poland[/TD]

[TD]0.26[/TD]

[TD]0.02[/TD]

[TD]0.12[/TD]

[TD]0.02[/TD]

[TD]0.09[/TD]

[TD]2010[/TD]

[TD]WHO 2012[10][/TD]

[/TR]

[TR]

[TD] Singapore[/TD]

[TD]0.24[/TD]

[TD]0.07[/TD]

[TD]0.17[/TD]

[TD]0[/TD]

[TD]NA[/TD]

[TD]1994[/TD]

[TD]Krug 1998[13][/TD]

[/TR]

[TR]

[TD] Romania[/TD]

[TD]0.20[/TD]

[TD]0.04[/TD]

[TD]0.06[/TD]

[TD]0.09[/TD]

[TD]0.01[/TD]

[TD]2010[/TD]

[TD]WHO 2012[10][/TD]

[/TR]

[TR]

[TD] Hong Kong[/TD]

[TD]0.19[/TD]

[TD]0.12[/TD]

[TD]0.07[/TD]

[TD]0[/TD]

[TD]NA[/TD]

[TD]1993[/TD]

[TD]Krug 1998[13][/TD]

[/TR]

[TR]

[TD] Mauritius[/TD]

[TD]0.19[/TD]

[TD]0[/TD]

[TD]0.09[/TD]

[TD]0.09[/TD]

[TD]NA[/TD]

[TD]1993[/TD]

[TD]Krug 1998[13][/TD]

[/TR]

[TR]

[TD] Qatar[/TD]

[TD]0.18[/TD]

[TD]0.18[/TD]

[TD]NA[/TD]

[TD]NA[/TD]

[TD]NA[/TD]

[TD]2000[/TD]

[TD]UNODC 2000[11][/TD]

[/TR]

[TR]

[TD] South Korea[/TD]

[TD]0.13[/TD]

[TD]0.04[/TD]

[TD]0.02[/TD]

[TD]0.05[/TD]

[TD]NA[/TD]

[TD]1994[/TD]

[TD]Krug 1998[13][/TD]

[/TR]

[TR]

[TD] Japan[/TD]

[TD]0.07[/TD]

[TD]0.02[/TD]

[TD]0.04[/TD]

[TD]0[/TD]

[TD]NA[/TD]

[TD]1994[/TD]

[TD]Krug 1998[13][/TD]

[/TR]

[TR]

[TD] Azerbaijan[/TD]

[TD]0.07[/TD]

[TD]0.04[/TD]

[TD]0.01[/TD]

[TD]0.02[/TD]

[TD]NA[/TD]

[TD]2007[/TD]

[TD]WHO 2012[10][/TD]

[/TR]

[TR]

[TD] Chile[/TD]

[TD]0.06[/TD]

[TD]0.06[/TD]

[TD]NA[/TD]

[TD]NA[/TD]

[TD]NA[/TD]

[TD]2002[/TD]

[TD]UNODC 2002[7][/TD]

[/TR]

[/TABLE]

[/TD]

[/TR]

[TR]

[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[/TR]

[TR]

[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[TD][/TD]

[/TR]

[TR]

[TD][/TD]

[/TR]

[/TABLE]

10.2 (ours) vs the lowest .06 (Chile)... which makes ours ONE HUNDRED SEVENTY (170) TIMES HIGHER! And while the entire European Union (500 million people and 27 countries) had only 1,260 murders by guns... the United States (only 300 million compared to 500 million) had 10,801!!!!!! http://www.fox.temple.edu/cms/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/JeanLemaire.pdf That is nearly 10 times higher. [h=1][/h]

Interesting information. Am I the only one that noticed something the top countries, including the US, have in common? Two things actually. They all have major drug problems and they also have major gang problems.

Why would Sweden, Finland, Qatar, etc have a lot of gun deaths, they don't have the same social problems as us. They don't have armed gangs killing each other over turf to sell their drugs. But we do, just like Mexico and Colombia. Yeah, banning guns would solve that problem in a week or two.

Did you also notice how old some of these statistics are? They go back as far as 1993.

Specializes in Trauma.
Tyvin, I was raised by a single parent and never smoked, never drank, never broke the law... received many awards in school "Star Student, ect" never bullied anyone (as far as I know), good to my friends and others, was involved in sports, dance, and many other EC's, worked since 14 in various part time jobs, graduated and went to college with scholarships.... got a 4.0 in college, took leadership positions in student organizations, volunteered, ect. All it takes is one good person (you actually do not need two)... or better yet, one's OWN will, determination, ambition, and hard work.

Single parenthood has nothing to do with well... anything (negative that is). The president was practically raised completely by his mother, practically a single parent from the get-go. There are many with this same story. Even more dramatic... I know people who had practically no parents at all and are doing just fine on their own. I can think of examples where people decide to not follow their family's footsteps. Why does this happen? Clearly it's due to a person's own free will - their ability to make their own choices of how they are going to live their lives. People control themselves and their actions. They are their own keepers. It is "I can because I want to" not "I can because someone tells me I can."

Genetics, home life, socioeconomic situation, geographic location (in America i.e.,) has nothing to do with what path a person ultimately chooses for themselves - it is their own free will and self-control. It is their choice.

(on separate subject in post, last par)...Actually, if you look at research on it... people are LESS likely to sadly and impulsively (which it usually is, contrary to some belief) make a snap decision when guns are not accessible. They also have a higher survival rate if they try. Pg 10 by Jean Lemaire, The Journal of Risk and Insurance... "The unavailability of a firearm then would reduce the fatality rate of firearm suicides from 96.5 percent to 22.42 percent [overall] for males, and from 96 percent to 5.99 percent [overall] for females" http://www.fox.temple.edu/cms/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/JeanLemaire.pdf (note, he is taking into account other methods and substitution).

This is like putting seat belts into a car.

((At least the American Nursing Association, Canadian Federation for Nursing Unions, and the Nurse/Congresswoman Carolyn McCarthy recognize this and are making a difference re D.C. lawmaking))

This is exactly why guns are harmful - they propel an "all or nothing" attitude... 100% success or 100% failure, alive or dead... false dilemma fallacy... as seen in this post.

People are so blind, they cannot see it... There has to be something done. At 30,000 gun-related deaths a year this adds up to 2,370,000 deaths (times 79, 2012-1933) since 1933 (first year it was recorded). This is as large as to be called genocide... a strong and suitable word for a horrific, atrocious amount.... When people look at this number or anything related to gun-deaths, they just bat their eye, as if it was nothing. Any statistics, any graphs, any facts, any comparisions to ourselves to countries around the world.. the 65 countries leading us in managing this, goes in one ear... and out another...

Also, re: registration... In Canada all long guns are required to be registered... this is one thing the Canadian Federation of Nursing Unions is strongly supporting in the previous post with persuasive and masterful ethos, pathos, and logos.

Do you realize using your own number of 30,000 gun deaths a year that equates to 0.01% of the population? I wonder how many of those 30,000 were killed in the commission of a criminal activity, i.e. gang bangers killing each other off?

HM-8404, according to the National Gang Center of the Bureau of Justice Assistance, gang-related homicides only count for about 2,000 (12%, meaning a ginormous 88% of gun-homicides are by those who are not gang members) out of all homicides (and 15,000 of all homicides are gun-related, meaning nearly all homicides are by gun). Even with all of these gang-related homicides being theoretically gun-related (some statistics show they nearly all are by gun as well, as overall), this is only 2,000 out of the 30,000 gun-related deaths... meaning merely .06% of gun-deaths are gang-related.

Even if gang-related violence was completely 100% eliminated, there would STILL be 28,000 gun-related deaths per year. Computing from the time gun-related deaths were first published (1933), with the subtraction of the substitution of gang-related firearm homicides.... this would still horrifyingly... add up to 2,212,000 gun-related, un-called for, cruel deaths... still an atrocious genocide and an abomination against humanity... a strong word for a large, devastating amount.

Source:

Measuring the Extent of Gang Problems "The total number of gang homicides reported by respondents in the NYGS sample averaged nearly 2,000 annually from 2006 to 2010. During the same time period, the FBI estimated, on average, more than 16,000 homicides across the United States (www.fbi.gov/about-us/cjis/ucr/crime-in-the-u.s/2010/crime-in-the-u.s.-2010/tables/10tbl01.xls). These estimates suggest that gang-related homicides typically accounted for around 12 percent of all homicides annually."

Also, most of those statistics are from 2012 and 2011. I see none on the list I gave which are from 1993. If one looks at the research, while other countries have implemented considerable regulation and control early on, lowering their numbers of deaths and increasing their life-spans (we fall far behind on overall life-span as well.. Jean Lamaire is keen on this having, partly, to do with our revolting number gun-related deaths... as he wrote in the Journal of Risk and Insurance), we have failed to do anything, accounting for nearly static, epidemic numbers in comparison.... an embarrassment on the world stage and catastrophic for our people.

Interesting information. Am I the only one that noticed something the top countries, including the US, have in common? Two things actually. They all have major drug problems and they also have major gang problems.

Why would Sweden, Finland, Qatar, etc have a lot of gun deaths, they don't have the same social problems as us. They don't have armed gangs killing each other over turf to sell their drugs. But we do, just like Mexico and Colombia. Yeah, banning guns would solve that problem in a week or two.

Did you also notice how old some of these statistics are? They go back as far as 1993.

Do you realize using your own number of 30,000 gun deaths a year that equates to 0.01% of the population? I wonder how many of those 30,000 were killed in the commission of a criminal activity, i.e. gang bangers killing each other off?

Ah ,the lovely Canadian gun registry. Perhaps you'd be interested to know that the gun registry has been dismantled due to it's resounding failure and unjustified expense.

In Canada, this was a partisanship issue (by a minority party at this... which remarkably was elected), controversial and heated, half or more of the country is against it. The registration could be replaced shorty by a majority, not minority, party (already it is being an issue for the opposing side)... Most importantly, healthcare professionals (such as the Canadian Federation of Nursing Unions) and law enforcement are completely against the changes. Contrary to this post, according to statistics attained by the Canadian Federation of Nursing Unions, in their letter to the Canadian Senate Standing Committee on Legal and Constitutional Affairs, their controls have been successful, with a 43% decrease in gun-related deaths.

"In April 2010, CFNU [Canadian Federation of Nurses Unions] joined Canadian healthcare organizations, such as the Canadian Association for Adolescent Health, the Canadian Association of Emergency Physicians, the Canadian

Paediatric Society, the Canadian Public Health Association and many others in releasing a joint statement on the gun control and the long gun registry.

Why? Because over the years, members of the health community have fought for stronger controls

on firearms.

Why? Because of the staggering burden of preventable gun death and injury: almost 1400

Canadians died of gunshots in 1991, close to half the number killed in automobile crashes.

The vast majority of firearm deaths in Canada are not gang related but occur when an ordinary

citizen becomes suicidal or violent, often under the influence of alcohol or drugs, or during a

personal crisis such as marital breakdown or job loss. We also know that when firearms are

available, domestic homicides are more likely to involve multiple victims and end in suicide.

We are therefore encouraged to see positive results since the latest waves of legislative reforms. In

2005, there were 818 firearms related deaths in Canada. This represents an astonishing decrease of 43% of all gun deaths since 1991.

Health organizations fought to pass improvements to the law in 1991 as well as in 1995. Scientific research shows that progressive controls on firearms have resulted in a reduction in firearm death and injury. Canada's law has been cited as a model of effective legislation worldwide, particularly

in combating violence against women. It is also consistent with global norms including the

recently announced European Firearms Directive which establishes uniform standards for all

European Union countries and includes the registration of all firearms.

As health professionals, we know the importance of investing in prevention, whether in road

safety or prevention of infectious diseases. It is true that one cannot easily measure prevention, but we can certainly measure the effects of ignoring it. To our knowledge, six different coroners'

inquests recommended the licensing of gun owners and registration of all firearms. Indeed, our

daily practice informs us of the very real risks associated with firearms and of the value of a strong gun control law.

Health and safety is a key concern of our work as a union as well as our work as health

professionals.Ensuring health and safety is about identifying and mitigating risk. We know that registration reduces risk of firearm related injury and death.

As nurses, as women, as trade unionists, CFNU urges the Senate Committee to recommend

against the passage of Bill C-19."

The Canadian Federation of Nurses Unions, another portion from the letter sent to the Canadian Senate Standing Committee on Legal and Constitutional Affairs http://www.nursesunions.ca/sites/default/files/gun_control_statement_march_28_2012.pdf

Even with this change (strongly against health professionals' and law-enforcements' recommendations and urges for the laws continuity)...Canada still has more restrictive laws than the USA.

"[Prime Minister of Canada Stephan] Harper said it's worth remembering that Canada has a stronger, stricter gun control system than exists in the United States, even without the long-gun registry.

"We will not change the basis of this system. Actually, we have reinforced certain parts," he said.

Harper said Canada continues to require gun licences and that handguns and restricted weapons be registered.

"We will keep this system that works." Canada's gun controls 'work,' Harper says in wake of Newtown - Politics - CBC News

All other firearms in Canada still need to be registered, even with these changes.

Specializes in Trauma.
HM-8404, according to the National Gang Center of the Bureau of Justice Assistance, gang-related homicides only count for about 2,000 (12%, meaning a ginormous 88% of gun-homicides are by those who are not gang members) out of all homicides (and 15,000 of all homicides are gun-related, meaning nearly all homicides are by gun). Even with all of these gang-related homicides being theoretically gun-related (some statistics show they nearly all are by gun as well, as overall), this is only 2,000 out of the 30,000 gun-related deaths... meaning merely .06% of gun-deaths are gang-related.

I said in the commission of a crime such as a gang banger. You say MERELY 0.06% of gun deaths are gang related. If 0.06% is considered merely what do you consider 0.01%?

Even if gang-related violence was completely 100% eliminated, there would STILL be 28,000 gun-related deaths per year. Computing from the time gun-related deaths were first published (1933), with the subtraction of the substitution of gang-related firearm homicides.... this would still horrifyingly... add up to 2,212,000 gun-related, un-called for, cruel deaths... still an atrocious genocide and an abomination against humanity... a strong word for a large, devastating amount.

In your 80 year example how many people were killed by tobacco, alcohol, or automobile accidents? I guess guns just look more scary than a bottle of Miller Lite, or a Chevy Malibu.

Source:

Measuring the Extent of Gang Problems "The total number of gang homicides reported by respondents in the NYGS sample averaged nearly 2,000 annually from 2006 to 2010. During the same time period, the FBI estimated, on average, more than 16,000 homicides across the United States (www.fbi.gov/about-us/cjis/ucr/crime-in-the-u.s/2010/crime-in-the-u.s.-2010/tables/10tbl01.xls). These estimates suggest that gang-related homicides typically accounted for around 12 percent of all homicides annually."

Also, most of those statistics are from 2012 and 2011. I see none on the list I gave which are from 1993. If one looks at the research, while other countries have implemented considerable regulation and control early on, lowering their numbers of deaths and increasing their life-spans (we fall far behind on overall life-span as well.. Jean Lamaire is keen on this having, partly, to do with our revolting number gun-related deaths... as he wrote in the Journal of Risk and Insurance), we have failed to do anything, accounting for nearly static, epidemic numbers in comparison.... an embarrassment on the world stage and catastrophic for our people.

So guns are the reason for shorter life expectancy in the US rather than Big Macs and our processed food addiction? Come on, be serious.

+ Add a Comment