Angeljho, MSN, RN, NP 7,179 Views
Joined: Oct 2, '09;
Posts: 393 (67% Liked)
; Likes: 1,204
My program was very good. I went to Stony Brook, which really prepared me for the boards. The exams were structured similar to ANCC, including the wording of the questions and the content. The last semester incorporated the Fitzgerald course into the curriculum. Overall, it was a really good program that prepares you to pass boards upon graduation.
So glad that is over and done with lol. What an experience. I graduated a year ago and put the test off due to a death in the family that really hit home. I'm happy I was able to get back on track and continue on with my development. Never give up!
Male nurse here (since everyone is shouting out their gender lol). Anyway, I don't get many opportunities to do catheterizations at my job. Sucks, I know. Therefore, whenever a male or female needs to be catheterized, I jump at the chance to do it so I can develop my skills in that area. Of course if a female patient is uncomfortable with a male nurse, a female nurse will be provided.
It really sounds like YOU'RE the uncomfortable one OP. You have the right to your beliefs, but you can't speak for women and think they would be better off with a female nurse because "all women prefer a female nurse for that type of care."
I am so devastated. To start off, I have a previous MSN degree in leadership/management. I am currently in a post MSN program for PMHNP; I started last month and I'm still in my first class. Long story short, I was notified by the school that I can no longer be considered as a post MSN student since my MSN degree is non-clinical. Therefore, I will have to take the full MSN track including the theory, research, and organizational leadership courses I already took.
This is not cost-effective at all for me. My employer reimburses me for tuition, but they are not willing to reimburse me for classes I already took . Not only that, I JUST finished my previous MSN program in January 2015. After doing my research, I figured another two years wouldn't be too much, especially since I was going to take one or two classes at a time. However, now it will take me 3.5 years to finish this PMHNP program and it will be much longer if I don't group more than two classes together in some semesters.
I'm at a complete loss of what to do. This wasn't an oversight of some kind. I did my research with this school and met all the criteria for a post MSN student which is why I was accepted as such. The school just simply changed it's standards, and I'm too close to the beginning to be grandfathered in.
I really, really want to be a PMHNP but I don't know if I have it in me to financially burden or carry myself through another full MSN degree program. I know the decision is up to me, but I really want to know what others would do if they were in my shoes.
Going to school was more stressful for me because of everything that comes with it. Committing time to study, balancing rent/bills/other expenses with tuition, giving up certain life pleasures because of school. Work is just work; you go, make your 8 or 12 hours, and then go home.
What do you mean by a "down and dirty" RN program? Our RN portion of the program was the same as any ADN program (I do not have a BSN). We had to have the basic science pre-reqs (A+P, chemistry, micro, etc) finished before we could even apply to the DE program. We all had at least a Bachelors in another discipline, so we didn't have to take any of the Gen Ed courses. We took Health Assessment, Theory, Patho, Pharm, Ethics, Research, etc. and did the same number of clinical hours and synthesis as the undergrad BSN students. We took NCLEX after all of those requirements were completed, just like any other RN student.
I don't feel like I started "further behind" as an NP because I didn't work as an RN. To be honest, I use very little of what I learned in the RN part of my program. I'm not saying it wasn't valuable and necessary, but most of it isn't relevant to what I do on a daily basis.
When did you hear back? I applied to the PMHNP program.
I'm a contracted tech that draws blood 6am in these type of living assistant home. I've found many aides sleeping, nurses not even on the same floor they need to be. They hire the most lazy, non educated people so they can pay them as low as possible. I've walked into patients room, with patients laid on the floor. I've walked into patients room that have passed away for several hours. Most of these nurses or aides that I've seen at these living assistance places should have license be taken away. I've reported these types of incidents to upper management as I see them occur. I hope they have bettwr back ground checks and random visits from higher people that gives them jobs.
This did it. I have no more neurons left.
Call me old-fashioned, but I would not want a convicted murderer working along side me in the hospital or taking care of me or my family.
Good for you! I get very tired of the argument that for some reason nurse practitioners desperately need RN experience, but MDs, DOs, and PAs are good to go. No one is saying it isn't beneficial, but RN experience is in no way necessary to be a safe and effective healthcare provider.
Only reason I listed my clinical hours on my resume was due to the fact fellow cohort who got jobs had listed their clinical hours and told me to do it as well.
Wait... Murse = Male Nurse? That's a slap to me for going completely over my head.
I noticed that individuals with no healthcare background tend to specify "male nurse." It never really bothered me, but I do see how it can tick some nurses off.
PsychGuy, I get what you're asking but as another poster answered, the DNP is the terminal degree for nursing clinical practice. There is no other terminal practice based degree that offers what you're asking because it would NOT be nursing. Think about it, if the courses that many consider "fluff" were removed and more scientific-based courses were added, what would be the difference between medicine and nursing? I do agree that more scientific-based courses make a more competent provider, but there's a reason why people say APRNs practice advanced nursing and PAs/MDs practice medicine.
Anyways, I was just giving you my understanding of it. I do agree with you and feel that the nursing educational model needs to change. I am entering PMHNP school, and I'm expecting to know neurophysiology to the "T." I see a lot of APRNs on here who have complained that they did not feel prepared upon completion of school. I did not know it was to the extent of not knowing what hippocampus is.
Got it, thanks, although it took me nearly an hour to get into my OVID account, lol. Did you get the article from this message board? Its been posted here more than once.
I really can't find much out there that directly addresses this topic. This although exactly the kind of information we need was rather luke warm imo. That it was based on a very small self-report by NPs and physicians who have a relationship and invested interest in them being competent so I question the objectivity. If someone asked me if I were competent I'd fill in the circles indicating hell yes as would my boss. I would really like to see an outcomes measure but again heading in the right direction I guess. To be fair I'm not usually a huge fan of nursing research.
Something interesting to consider regarding the original article was a commentary:
"In our study, "Improving the Effectiveness of Primary Health Care Delivery through Nurse Practitioner/Family Physician Structured Collaborative Practice"1, qualitative findings stressed the correlation between physician perception of NP competence and the establishment of a relationship with that NP. This finding was also observed in the Ontario Medical Association/Registered Nurses Association of Ontario study2where recognition of expertise was based on personal experience with their NP rather than on a view of all NPs as primary health-care experts. We therefore support the statement that physicians may have been influenced by their personal relationships and also would like to ask if the collaborating physicians in Dr. Rich's study had served as preceptors to the NPs that they were now evaluating?"
Linda Jones, RN(EC), BSN, CFNP
Integrative Review of Graduate Entry Programs in Nursing
Is it possible to summarize the findings (I don't have a Lippincott log-in).
Advertise With Us