Did You Know?
allnurses is the largest community for nurses on the web. We now have over 388,805 members! Join today to network with other nurses, laugh, share, and much more.
| No. 20 |
Jun 28, 2004, 09:08 PM
Originally Posted by kmchugh OK, let me add to the question. Once upon a time, within the last couple of years, I had a co-worker who would draw up a 20cc syringe of propofol for use with endo MAC procedures. This co-worker would put the syringe in a pump, connect tubing from the syringe to the patient's flowing IV line, and let 'er rip. When finished with one procedure, the co-worker would disconnect the tubing and throw it out, then attach a new tubing to the same syringe and use it for the next patient. I talked to this person about it a few times, but they felt the procedure they were following was safe, and saving the hospital money, since the procedures often only took 5 minutes. To this person's thinking, one syringe and one 20cc bottle of propofol could be used for two or even three patients.
Clearly, I think this is wrong as two left shoes, but my co-worker could not be convinced. Any thoughts?
Kevin McHugh
I too hava a coworker that does the same thing. Poor practice I believe.
| | Advertisement Sponsored Links | | | | No. 21 |
Jul 07, 2004, 03:41 AM
Updated
Jul 07, 2004 at 10:25 PM by stevierae
Originally Posted by InterestedRN I think that it is interesting that you would suggest that every anesthesia provider would engage in this practice. It is true that recently ONE practitioner was doing this, which contributed to a hepatitis infection spread. I'm a bit concerned about what your intentions are, and believe that your characterizations are exaggerated.
Huh?! What? I think maybe you misunderstood my post, and I certainly have no secondary agenda! Nowhere did I say or insinuate that "every" anesthesia provider I work with in today's environment (I do registry and travel OR nursing, as well as IV and pump teaching, in many states) did this.
I think if you reread my original post you will understand. I was referencing the 80's, and even part of the '90s, when it was very common--not as common as in the '80s, but fairly common. I am unaware of any hospital acquired infections from these practices at any facility where I have worked or taught--that's not to say they didn't occur. I was not aware of the referenced hepatitis outbreak until I read about it here.
Now, flash forward to the 21st century. I still see it done. Not consistently; not by everyone, but I still see it done. The borrowing of a succs drip (to be returned and used on various patients until empty) is one I have seen done, oh, as recently as the time I posted my original question.
Oh, and putting extension tubing from a propofol syringe pump onto a patient's IV, then just discarding the extension tubing after use and using new extension tubing, but the same propofol with the same syringe pump tubing? Or not using extension tubing, but just changing the syringe pump tubing between patients? Still see that fairly frequently. Again--not by "every" anesthesia provider, and not universally. But--frequently enough to wonder where people are getting the idea that it is STILL acceptable.
But, I posted to get opinions as to what other folks thought of what I was witnessing, and if they were still seeing it, too. I haven't posted to or read this thread in a while, so was surprised to see your comment. Mostly I was just interested in how other facilities do things, and their rationales for doing them that way.
If you are looking for secondary agendas, InterestedRN, you won't find them in anything I post. LOL!
OK, here is another question--do any of your facilities wash and reuse circuit tubing? I sometimes work at a place that still does--I know they did all throughout the '90s, when I was staff there; and when I work there occasionally now through registry, now, I still see it done. Is this type of recycling OK in today's environment, with SARS and community acquired pneumonia? The rationale I heard in the '90s was that there is one way valve on the tubing, so it all goes to the patient, therefore nothing (i.e., waste anesthetic gases) is expired that would "contaminate" the tubing....what say you all?
| | No. 22 |
Jul 07, 2004, 12:54 PM
Kevin, you are absolutely right! Tejas had some good references. At some point in time, trying to convince someone to change their practice, no matter how outdated, becomes unproductive. TPTB need to write a policy stating the correct practice, and the disciplinary consequences of not following that policy clearly spelled out. After that, your co-worker is out on a limb from which I would not want to hang.
| | No. 23 |
Jul 07, 2004, 09:46 PM
Originally Posted by stevierae Huh?! What? I think maybe you misunderstood my post, and I certainly have no secondary agenda! Nowhere did I say or insinuate that "every" anesthesia provider I work with in today's environment (I do registry and travel OR nursing, as well as IV and pump teaching, in many states.)
I think if you reread my original post you will understand. I was referencing the 80's, and even part of the '90s, when it was very common--not as common as in the '80s, but fairly common. I am unaware of any hospital acquired infections from these practices at any facility where I have worked or taught--that's not to say they didn't occur. I was not aware of the referenced hepatitis outbreak until I read about it here.
Now, flash forward to the 21st century. I still see it done. Not consistently; not by everyone, but I still see it done. The borrowing of a succs drip (to be returned and used on various patients until empty) is one I have seen done, oh, as recently as the time I posted my original question.
Oh, and putting extension tubing from a propofol syringe pump onto a patient's IV, then just discarding the extension tubing after use and using new extension tubing, but the same propofol with the same syringe pump tubing? Or not using extension tubing, but just changing the syringe pump tubing between patients? Still see that fairly frequently. Again--not by "every" anesthesia provider, and not universally. But--frequently enough to wonder where people are getting the idea that it is STILL acceptable.
But, I posted to get opinions as to what other folks thought of what I was witnessing, and if they were still seeing it, too. I haven't posted to or read this thread in a while, so was surprised to see your comment. Mostly I was just interested in how other facilities do things, and their rationales for doing them that way.
If you are looking for secondary agendas, InterestedRN, you won't find them in anything I post. LOL!
OK, here is another question--do any of your facilities wash and reuse circuit tubing? I sometimes work at a place that still does--I know they did all throughout the '90s, when I was staff there; and when I work there occasionally now through registry, now, I still see it done. Is this type of recycling OK in today's environment, with SARS and community acquired pneumonia? The rationale I heard in the '90s was that there is one way valve on the tubing, so it all goes to the patient, therefore nothing (i.e., waste anesthetic gases) is expired that would "contaminate" the tubing....what say you all?
Thank you for clarifying your experience and position. What you describe is clearly sub-standard care and should not be acceptable practice in ANY health care providers approach to patients. Hopefully, your question will raise awareness, and (further) prevent this from happening.
Let's face it, the only ones that are going to stop this kind of thing from happening are US.
Thanks again,
Interested
| | No. 24 |
Jul 07, 2004, 10:06 PM
Updated
Jul 07, 2004 at 11:56 PM by stevierae
Originally Posted by InterestedRN Thank you for clarifying your experience and position. What you describe is clearly sub-standard care and should not be acceptable practice in ANY health care providers approach to patients. Hopefully, your question will raise awareness, and (further) prevent this from happening.
Let's face it, the only ones that are going to stop this kind of thing from happening are US.
Thanks again,
Interested
Yes, but--in every operating room in which I have worked or taught, the anesthesia department is a separate entity which makes its own rules, and is not interested, for the most part, in the input of the operating room nurses on subjects such as this. Not to say they don't respect us as professionals or value our input on other things; not to say they are not perfectly pleasant and sociable individuals--it's just on this subjects such as this, they make their own policies and procedures.
I found this to be particularly true when teaching safety IV catheters, both for B Braun and for BD (Becton Dickinson--) even though I would teach how the safety IV catheters could be used as an art line (some anesthesia providers are skeptical, but it can be done) many anesthesia departments DID NOT want to use safety IV catheters. They were more comfortable with the old style non-safety catheters (i.e., InSyte vs. InSyte AutoGuard, the BD product which has the push button to release the stylet.) Heck, so were we--so was I--but the learning curve involves, perhaps, 3 sticks--after that, you don't even think about it any more.
Also, even though the safer IV products were mandated by a bill signed into effect by then President Clinton, and hospitals could be fined for not using the safer products, for some reason the anesthesia department was always exempted. This included the last facility where I worked per diem. Our supervisor didn't like it, but she said that as long as the products were IN STOCK-- that is, AVAILABLE--they were in compliance, so who knows. However, she would have preferred that they switch, but was powerless in requiring that they do so---it was not her call.
I do understand why other safety needles--i.e,. TB and insulin syringes with self-capping and pre-attached needles, or individual self-capping needles--are impractical and useless in an operating room, where most of our injections are IV through needleless ports, so that's never been an issue to argue about, in my opinion.
We still need to keep the old, non-safety injection needles in the OR, not replace those with safety needles. When we draw up meds, we need non-safety 18 g needles to do it with. (Although, with multi-access vials, you can insert a spike adapter and draw through an empty syringe--but, then if you want to prepare a piggyback or just add medication to a bag of IV fluid for decanting onto the sterile filed, you STILL need an 18 G needle--so we need to keep the non-safety ones for tasks like this.
| | No. 25 |
Jul 07, 2004, 10:18 PM
Wow. I have no OR experience. When the time comes that my husband or I must undergo a surgical procedure, how should I go about letting the anesthsia staff know that I want to make sure only new, unused syringes and tubing are used for our care?
| | No. 26 |
Jul 07, 2004, 10:32 PM
reusing syringes
I've got an idea - lets ask the patients if they would mind us using syringes over and over again. Explain to them - that there's only a small chance of cross contamination.  Maybe we could also save the hospital money by reusing bedpans, urinals, foleys, etc...
Would the hospital give them a rebate ? I'll bet that the hospital charged each and every patient for that same syringe. Also, reading this conversation about aspirating, amber ports, hepatitis, and how there is little chance of contamination - that would be to assume that we know all of the risks involved. There was a time when we had never heard of AIDS - I wonder what disease is lurking around the corner. You can never be too safe. Anyway, thats my two cents worth. | | No. 27 |
Jul 07, 2004, 10:36 PM
Originally Posted by jwk Propofol is a particular concern. It is supposed to be discarded after 4 hours due to propofol being an excellent bacterial growth media. There was a well-publicized case several years ago of an anesthetist who used the same propofol syringe for several days with less than favorable patient outcomes.
Actually propofol (Diprivan) is good for 12 hours. After that, the bottle and the tubing must be replaced.
As for reusing syringes, just the thought of it makes my skin crawl!!! Surely noone still does that today!!!
| | No. 28 |
Jul 07, 2004, 10:36 PM
Updated
Jul 07, 2004 at 10:39 PM by ERslave
Originally Posted by Hellllllo Nurse Wow. I have no OR experience. When the time comes that my husband or I must undergo a surgical procedure, how should I go about letting the anesthsia staff know that I want to make sure only new, unused syringes and tubing are used for our care?
Why not put it on your living will | | No. 29 |
Jul 07, 2004, 11:01 PM
Can we all say EWWW! hope I never have to have surgery with them. | | 257 members
2,421 guests 2,678 | 46 | | | 1 | | | 13 | | | 2 | | | 10 | | | 17 | | | 11 | | | 16 | | | 16 | | | 42 | | | 14 | | | 21 | | | 23 | | | 20 | | | 24 | | |
Nursing News