Pulseless VT/VT

Specialties Cardiac

Published

When is Ventricular Tachycardia considered pulseless ventricular tachycardia? I have seen videos with, for example, 220 bpm vtach with a pulse, and i have seen videos with 140 bpm pulseless vtach. i thought it depends on how fast the vtach is (faster rhythm->less cardiac output)? and why do you need to sync the vtach when converting if you can defibrilliate it like vfib if it is pulseless? you sedate the patient anyways. sorry if all of this sounds stupid, im only 16 and i have been studying all of this by myself

Specializes in OR, Nursing Professional Development.

Pulseless VT means the patient does not have a pulse. This is where you would do a defibrillation. VT with a pulse requires synchronized cardioversion because shocking unsynchronized can cause a shock to occur during a phase of electrical activity that will actually cause the rhythm to deteriorate. It's not the speed that determines pulselessness but whether or not the patient has a pulse.

i know that pulseless ventricular tachycardia is a ventricular tachycardia without a pulse, but what does make it pulseless?

Specializes in Family Nurse Practitioner.

Lack of adequate/any perfusion makes it pulseless.

Specializes in Public Health, TB.

Perfusion and cardiac output depend on stroke volume, or how much blood the the heart pushes out with each contraction and heart rate. If blood volume is low, or the heart is not pumping effectively, less is pushed out. So a hypovolemic patient or one with a weak heart may become pulseless with lower heart rate.

Regarding sync vs. non sync. : if you have time, say in v tach with a pulse, you can sync and deliver the shock on the r wave. This decreases the chance of causing v fib and allows a lower dose of electricity. However, your defibrillator may not be able to detect the r wave, in which case you need to defibrillate (deliver a larger dose of unsynchronized electricity).

Specializes in Emergency Department.
i know that pulseless ventricular tachycardia is a ventricular tachycardia without a pulse, but what does make it pulseless?

Quite simply, what makes it "pulseless" is that cardiac output is so low (effectively zero) that there are no palpable pulses anywhere. Any rhythm that does not generate a pulse is, by definition of no pulse, pulseless. You can have a beautiful looking normal sinus rhythm on the monitor and no pulses. That's called "Pulseless Electrical Activity" and it used to be called "Electromechanical Dissociation" meaning that there was no mechanical activity (no pumping) in response to the electrical stimulation.

It's not so much a specific rate that is the problem, it's that at whatever rate that's going, it's that the rate happens to be too fast for that particular patient's heart to pump effectively at that time. The rhythm only has to be a ventricular tachycardia.

i know that pulseless ventricular tachycardia is a ventricular tachycardia without a pulse, but what does make it pulseless?

You have a very bright future ahead of you, I think. Very insightful question.

Patients have pulseless rhythms for all kinds of different reasons. In VT, it's just a matter of whether or not the patient can tolerate the faster heart rate, and that is determined by a lot of factors, not the least of which is the baseline cardiovascular status of the patient in the first place.

In VT, there are two impediments to adequate filling of the heart with blood. The first is the lack of atrial 'kick' filling of the ventricles, the second is that the ventricles don't fully relax and fill because there isn't enough time between heart beats.

If you're 22 years old, you have a better chance of having a pulse with that. If you're 82 years old, not so much.

Get it, Hot Shot?

i kinda start to get it, thank you! :) i want to study cardiology/electrophysiology but the long years of studying scare me. almost 10 years of intensive studying, i'd rather be a stripper

i kinda start to get it, thank you! :) i want to study cardiology/electrophysiology but the long years of studying scare me. almost 10 years of intensive studying, i'd rather be a stripper

Well, you can pick being 10 years older as a stripper or 10 years older as an electrophysiologist. Either way, 10 years is going to pass. Good luck!

+ Add a Comment