Why unions are good for nursing and good for patients

Nurses Union

Published

The article below is long but a good reference to support why unions are best practice.

Nursing Journal Study Shows Nurses Unions Improve Patient Outcomes in Hospitals.

Patients Treated for Heart Attacks Have Lower Mortality Rate at RN-Unionized Hospitals

Patients with heart trouble would be wise to seek care at a hospital with a nurses union according to a recent study of the impact of nurses unions and the mortality rate for patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI, the medical terminology for heart attack). The study, which was published in the March issue of JONA (Journal of Nursing Administration), studied hospitals in California and found that hospitals with a nurse’s union had a "significantly predicted lower risk-adjusted AMI mortality."

The study’s authors, Jean Ann Seago, PhD, RN and Michael Ash, PhD, concluded that "this study demonstrates that there is a positive relationship between patient outcomes and RN unions." Editor’s Note: for a fax copy of the study, contact the MNA at 781.249.0430

"Thirty-five percent of hospitals in California have RN unions. The significant finding in this study is that hospitals in California with RN unions have 5.7% lower mortality rates for AMI after accounting for patient age, gender, type of MI, chronic diseases and several organizational characteristics. This result includes controls for number of beds, AMI-related discharges, cardiac services, staff hours and wages.

In discussing how unions impact the quality of patient care, the authors stated, "unions may impact the quality of care by negotiating increased staffing levels…that improve patient outcomes. Alternatively, unions may affect the organization nursing staff or the way nursing care is delivered in a fashion that facilitates RN-MD communication. This is the ‘voice’ function of unions…Yet another possible mechanism by which unions can improve care is by raising wages, thereby decreasing turnover, which may improve patient care."

The authors conclude, "perhaps having an RN union promotes stability in staff, autonomy, collaboration with MDs and practice decisions that have been described as having a positive influence on the work environment and on the patient outcomes."

"We at the MNA couldn’t have said it better ourselves,’ said Karen Higgins, RN, MNA President. "In fact, we have been saying this for years - a patient’s greatest advocate is a unionized nurse, because a unionized nurse has the protected right and the power to stand up for their practice and their profession. The fact that this same message is being delivered through a research study published in a journal for nursing administrators is even more telling. These are the folks who often fight tooth and nail to prevent nurses from forming a union. Perhaps now they will see the value of having a union at their facility. We know the staff nurses here in Massachusetts have seen the value."...

Specializes in Critical care, tele, Medical-Surgical.
Specializes in MPCU.

That's the oc register not the metro, no wonder I couldn't find the article. Thank you, it was an interesting read, but not related to the topic of this thread.

The national "no fear act of 2000" was sponsored by the national whistleblowers center and not a union. You can find more information about whistleblower protections at their website http://www.whistleblowers.org/. More comprehensive and federal level protection without a union sponsorship.

Specializes in psych. rehab nursing, float pool.

woodenpug, I am curious, is the facility you work in union? While I can honestly say I am not opposed to unions and in some cases they are needed. I am just as happy to be working in a place now which does not have a union. I do not know if I will always feel this way, someday it might change.

I just am wondering is this a mental exercise on your part. Or are you in fact anti union?

Specializes in MPCU.
woodenpug, I am curious, is the facility you work in union? While I can honestly say I am not opposed to unions and in some cases they are needed. I am just as happy to be working in a place now which does not have a union. I do not know if I will always feel this way, someday it might change.

I just am wondering is this a mental exercise on your part. Or are you in fact anti union?

Neither really. I see no benefit to unions. That is not exactly anti-union, just not pro-union.

I would like to see some valid information relating directly to patient outcomes being better in union organizations. Think what an outstanding nursing article that would make! I'm pretty sure none exists, so it could be you're right it's a mental exercise.

Specializes in Critical care, tele, Medical-Surgical.
That's the oc register not the metro, no wonder I couldn't find the article. Thank you, it was an interesting read, but not related to the topic of this thread.

The national "no fear act of 2000" was sponsored by the national whistleblowers center and not a union. You can find more information about whistleblower protections at their website http://www.whistleblowers.org/. More comprehensive and federal level protection without a union sponsorship.

Sorry you didn't see "The Orange County Register" in my post.

it was in "METRO section" of the Orange County Register.

The federal legislation is for federal government employees only. That is why the California Nurses Association sponsored the law. To protect hospital employees and patients. It was already law in skilled nursing facilities.

http://www.usdoj.gov/jmd/eeos/nofearactnotice.htm

Since 1999 all nurses and others are protected when reporting about California acute care hospitals.

It has been a great deterrant to retaliation.

Here is an article about the four laws passed in 1999:

http://www.allbusiness.com/health-care/health-care-professionals-nurses-nursing/6716386-1.html

Specializes in MPCU.
Sorry you didn't see "The Orange County Register" in my post.

it was in "METRO section" of the Orange County Register.

The federal legislation is for federal government employees only. That is why the California Nurses Association sponsored the law. To protect hospital employees and patients. It was already law in skilled nursing facilities.

http://www.usdoj.gov/jmd/eeos/nofearactnotice.htm

Since 1999 all nurses and others are protected when reporting about California acute care hospitals.

It has been a great deterrant to retaliation.

Here is an article about the four laws passed in 1999:

http://www.allbusiness.com/health-care/health-care-professionals-nurses-nursing/6716386-1.html

Yes, thank you. I ran across those. I never said that unions do not do good positive things. I am sure that those things can be done without unions.

I did say this thread has failed to live up to its premise.

There continues to be no evidence to support the proposition that unions are good for patient outcomes. (as compared to non-union organizations)

The example I gave was just one instance where no union was required to promote a good cause of the type you credited to union only activity.

Specializes in Critical care, tele, Medical-Surgical.
Yes, thank you. I ran across those. I never said that unions do not do good positive things. I am sure that those things can be done without unions.

I did say this thread has failed to live up to its premise.

There continues to be no evidence to support the proposition that unions are good for patient outcomes. (as compared to non-union organizations)

The example I gave was just one instance where no union was required to promote a good cause of the type you credited to union only activity.

Of course labor unions are not the ONLY organization for good.

It does take organization.

People need to organize in unity to work for the common good.

I think the thread is about ways unions are good for nurses and good for patients.

Not that ONLY unions do good. Just that unions do good.

I hope yo do your study.

I will purchase whatever publications or book where it becomes available.

No matter what the conclusion states.

I'll bet it also states more study is needed.

Specializes in MPCU.
Of course labor unions are not the ONLY organization for good.

It does take organization.

People need to organize in unity to work for the common good.

I think the thread is about ways unions are good for nurses and good for patients.

Not that ONLY unions do good. Just that unions do good.

I hope yo do your study.

I will purchase whatever publications or book where it becomes available.

No matter what the conclusion states.

I'll bet it also states more study is needed.

The title and first post misled me. Seemed to be saying that patients are better off in a union hospital. mea culpa. I guess we agree, unions do good is a fair and safe statement.

The review of literature is not very promising. I think the next step is to see if the pros can help me find something, I think I've made a reasonable effort. Yes, any pilot study would find that more study is needed.:D LOL

Specializes in Critical care, tele, Medical-Surgical.
The title and first post misled me. Seemed to be saying that patients are better off in a union hospital. mea culpa. I guess we agree, unions do good is a fair and safe statement.

The review of literature is not very promising. I think the next step is to see if the pros can help me find something, I think I've made a reasonable effort. Yes, any pilot study would find that more study is needed.:D LOL

I hope you are enjoying and learning.

I am!

Specializes in Critical care, tele, Medical-Surgical.
Compare infection rates between union/nonunion hospitals hospitals

compare LOS figures

Staff/patient ratios (I have read here that the evidence is conclusive that lower ratios result in better care.)

For that matter compare BSN penetration/retention.

I am willing to bet that the union hospitals have better results on just about any metric that can be devised. We don't need to study this to death. The indirect measures can be used to infer the best evidence.

Two attachments

Union effect on outcomes nurse%20Heart.pdf

Union nurses outcomes.pdf

Specializes in MPCU.
Two attachments

Thank you. I've been looking for something resembling evidence in this discussion. Right now, I have too many "irons in the fire" and I've followed too many false leads. If you have the time, please indicate in which peer reviewed journals these articles appeared. This type of evidence could be a strong positive force, if they can be substantiated.

Specializes in Critical care, tele, Medical-Surgical.

The University of Pennsylvania research was reported in the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA)

+ Add a Comment