Published
let's not create another new healthcare worker position!
fla anesthesia assistants gain ground in senate over nurses' objections
by mike salinero [email protected] http://tampatrib.com/floridametronews/mgah0yoqcxc.html
tallahassee - a senate committee on tuesday approved
published: feb 6, 2002
licensing anesthesia assistants to practice in florida under anesthesiologists' supervision.
currently, only anesthesiologists, who are doctors, and nurse anesthetists may provide anesthesiology.
anesthesiologists support the bill, saying there is a shortage of anesthesia providers in the state.
but nurse anesthetists deny the shortage. they say the bill is a move to replace them with lesser-trained and lower-paid anesthesia assistants. only registered nurses with a minimum number of clinical hours may enter a two-year anesthesia program. candidates for anesthesia assistant can enter that program with a four-year degree in any field.
``the licensing of anesthesia assistants is an experiment, and florida patients would be the test subjects,'' said bruce weiner, a tampa resident and president of the florida association of nurse anesthetists.
john mcdonough, a professor at florida international university, told the committee that he teaches nurse anesthetists and knows they are better trained.
but jerome modell, who recently retired as chairman of the anesthesiology department at the university of florida, said training for nurse anesthetists and anesthesia assistants is ``different but comparable.''
the sponsor of the bill, sen. debbie wasserman schultz, d-weston, confirmed she got a $1,000 campaign contribution from don sokolik, president of the state society of anesthesiologists. wasserman schultz said her vote was based on a ``deliberative'' study of the issue.
the bill is scheduled for three more committees before going to the senate floor. a companion house bill has cleared all committees and is ready for floor action.
reporter mike salinero can be reached at (850) 222-8382.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
info for letter writing campaign:
key committees for healthcare
florida senate and house of representatives members of the key healthcare committees
from fla nurses assoc.:
http://capwiz.com/fln/issues/alert/?alertid=8
senate committees
health, aging, and long-term care
chairman: senator saunders
vice chairman: senator dawson
members: senators brown-waite, campbell, clary, cowin, klein, peaden, pruitt, silver and wasserman-schultz
appropriations subcommittee on health and human services
chairman: senator silver
members: senators mitchell, peaden, sanderson, and saunders
banking and insurance
chairman: senator latvala
vice chairman: senator holzendorf
members: senators campbell, carlton, clary, constantine, dawson, garcia, geller, king, posey, rossin, and wasserman schultz
senate health committee members links:
house of representatives
council for healthy communities
chair: nancy argenziano
vice chair: curtis richardson
committee members: allan bense, gus bilirakis, nancy detert, frank farkas, mike fasano, carole green, ken littlefield, evelyn lynn, sandra murman, ken gotlieb, sally heyman, cindy lerner, eleanor sobel
elder and long term care
chair: carole green
vice chair: mark weissman
committee members: jeff atwater, hugh gibson, joe negron, jerry paul, dave russell, david simmons, leslie waters, phillip brutus, suzanne kosmas, richard mackek
health and human services appropriations
chair: jerry maygarden
vice chair: frank farkas
committee members: holly benson, heather fiorentino, rene garcia, hugh gibson, carole green, ken littlefield, phillip brutus, nan rich, irving slosberg, eleanor sobel
health promotion
chair: ken littlefield
vice chair: mike hogan
committee members: bob allen, ralph arza, holly benson, renier diaz de la portilla, manuel prieguez, susan bucher, joyce cusack, arthenia joyner, sara romeo, irving slosberg
health regulation
chair: frank farkas
vice chair: eleanor sobel
committee members: jd alexander, heather fiorentino, mike haridopolis, gayle herrell, randy johnson, marco rubio, stacy ritter, gary siplin, roger wishner
house committee on health regulation:
Survey on public opinion of AAs...
http://www.scienceblog.com/community/older/archives/K/0/pub0888.html
Geez, lets at least be honest and consider the source here - the AANA is hardly unbiased, and the questions asked were incredibly leading (or misleading as is usually the case with the AANA).
Kinda like those garbage studies over the last couple years looking at OB anesthesia and CRNA's.
Geez, lets at least be honest and consider the source here - the AANA is hardly unbiased, and the questions asked were incredibly leading (or misleading as is usually the case with the AANA).Kinda like those garbage studies over the last couple years looking at OB anesthesia and CRNA's.
Yep, if ain't in favor of AA's or MDAs it has to be garbage.....You are on nursing website by the way if you didn't forget. So if these studies are so flawed why don't you post the ASA reponse to how they are flawed or something that is little more substantial other than it has biased because it comes from the AANA.
Everything that comes out about CRNAs from the ASA is biased towards anesthesiologists....that is their professional organization so you expect it to be biased. So why would you not expect some bias from the professional organization for CRNAs? It hardly means that their studies are flawed just because you don't agree with them.
I realize that BSN's usually have at least 1 year experience in a critical care setting before attending a CRNA program (Just as AA's usually come from a very strong medical background), however while caring for sickly elders or working with babies in NICU is amazing and respectable work, I do not believe it should be a prerequisite or considered training directly towards administering anesthesia.
Just for the record, the ICU requirement for CRNA school is typically in a cardiovascular or surgical ICU. The NICU is usually NOT the unit where prospective CRNAs gain their clinical experience. Additionally, the MINIMUM requirement is 1 year. Most CRNA schools prefer 2-3 years in the ICU.
Just for the record, the ICU requirement for CRNA school is typically in a cardiovascular or surgical ICU. The NICU is usually NOT the unit where prospective CRNAs gain their clinical experience. Additionally, the MINIMUM requirement is 1 year. Most CRNA schools prefer 2-3 years in the ICU.
Just for the record, the requirement is for at minimum of 1 year of critical care experience, but each school may determine what constitutes "critical care" for their program. Depending on the program, it can be ER, NICU, or even PACU, in addition to the typical SICU/CCU, etc. And although many schools may prefer 2-3 years in the ICU, the minimum is indeed one year, and I know a number of CRNA's that were accepted to several different CRNA programs prior to their completing that one year, with the proviso that they complete that year prior to their starting their anesthesia program.
Just for the record, the requirement is for at minimum of 1 year of critical care experience, but each school may determine what constitutes "critical care" for their program. Depending on the program, it can be ER, NICU, or even PACU, in addition to the typical SICU/CCU, etc. And although many schools may prefer 2-3 years in the ICU, the minimum is indeed one year, and I know a number of CRNA's that were accepted to several different CRNA programs prior to their completing that one year, with the proviso that they complete that year prior to their starting their anesthesia program.
Please note that I wrote the words typically and minimum. Of course there are always exceptions to the rule.
I will NEVER allow an AA around my family members; having been around CRNAS and MDs oh say, 18 years in the nursing field and a future CRNA.
NO WAY. There are SO MANY INTRICACIES that an AA with NO PREVIOUS MEDICAL BACKGROUND can EVER see......I see PAs now running around who have NO CLUE....
Again, NO WAY....
I will NEVER allow an AA around my family members; having been around CRNAS and MDs oh say, 18 years in the nursing field and a future CRNA.NO WAY. There are SO MANY INTRICACIES that an AA with NO PREVIOUS MEDICAL BACKGROUND can EVER see......I see PAs now running around who have NO CLUE....
Again, NO WAY....
Nice emotional response - and of course totally biased towards nursing - that's fine, considering you're a nurse. But all of us see clueless folks out there, and I see plenty of clueless nurses and NP's, as well as all other types of medical or nursing providers you'd like to list.
Did you know many thousands of practicing CRNA's have NO degree whatsoever?
Nice emotional response - and of course totally biased towards nursing - that's fine, considering you're a nurse. But all of us see clueless folks out there, and I see plenty of clueless nurses and NP's, as well as all other types of medical or nursing providers you'd like to list.Did you know many thousands of practicing CRNA's have NO degree whatsoever?
I would suggest if you want a non biased response to stop hanging out on nursing websites.
Now for the part about non degree CRNAs.....The AANA has required a Master's degree to become a CRNA since 1990, almost twenty years! I don't anyone is going to have any qualms about a CRNA that has been practicing over 20yrs having a certificate vs a MSN.
According to the AMA anesthesiologist assistants have only had their national certification set up since 1989! The idea of AAs only goes back to sometime in the 1970's and there is still only a couple of thousand AA's!
Also, I highly doubt there are still thousands of practicing CRNAs w/o degrees. There are only around 30,000 CRNAs to begin with and then by the time you figure that the youngest CRNA would have to been practicing for over 20yrs.....I think someone is skewing facts for their own AA campaign now.
Now as far as people/nurses being uniformed about AAs. I think most of us are perfectly informed what AAs have become. The AA is nothing more than degree program for intelligent people designed to give the AMA/ASA a political tool to fight CRNA independence to ensure that MDAs maintain their supervising capabilities and high pay. The stuff about shortage of anesthesia providers is all bull! ASA doesn't care that there are potential shortages. ASA only cares about supervision and control of AAs/CRNAs. The recent AA battle in Maryland was a perfect example. The ASA tried to start an AA program in Maryland under the premise that their was/would be overall shortage of anesthesia providers in Maryland. When it was pointed out it would be faster and cheaper to just expand Univ. of Maryland's nurse anesthesia program then the story changed to oh we want to diversify the anesthesia providers!
The recent AA battle in Maryland was a perfect example. The ASA tried to start an AA program in Maryland under the premise that their was/would be overall shortage of anesthesia providers in Maryland. When it was pointed out it would be faster and cheaper to just expand Univ. of Maryland's nurse anesthesia program then the story changed to oh we want to diversify the anesthesia providers!
Can you elaborate a little more on this? I live in MD and am an aspiring CRNA. Any more information would be greatly appreciated.
Can you elaborate a little more on this? I live in MD and am an aspiring CRNA. Any more information would be greatly appreciated.
Here is an excerpt from an article/response to AA's in Maryland:
New Anesthesia Provider May Threaten Operating Room SafetyTue Feb 24, 2009 3:47pm EST
Legislation would Lower the Standard of Care by Allowing Inexperienced and
Less Educated Anesthesiologist Assistants to Deliver Anesthesia to Maryland
Patients
ANNAPOLIS, Md., Feb. 24 /PRNewswire-USNewswire/ -- The Maryland Association of
Nurse Anesthetists (MANA), whose members are Certified Registered Nurse
Anesthetists (CRNAs), today announced their opposition to Senate Bill 798 and
House Bill 1161. These troubling bills would license anesthesiologist
assistants (AAs) to practice in Maryland and would drastically alter the
anesthesia delivery model currently utilized in the state. AAs, who are less
qualified than anesthesiologists and CRNAs, currently are licensed or
certified to practice in only 10 states and cannot practice in the U.S.
Military. The bills are being supported by Johns Hopkins Hospital.
"The passage of this legislation would radically ...
Here is ASA's response about AA's http://www.beckersasc.com/news-analysis-asc/antikickback-legal-regulatory/anesthesiologist-assistants-may-soon-be-licensed-in-maryland.html
If you read through the PDF file you will see that the ASA has only officially included AA's in their ACT model since 1987 kinda of interesting when AA's want to complain that AANA has required since 1990....
wtbcrna, MSN, DNP, CRNA
5,128 Posts
Here are some web links on the differences between AAs and CRNAs:
http://www.asahq.org/asarc/AA-CRNA_Comparison.pdf
http://www.ala-crna.org/index_news_comparison.html (same table as above but different format)
Here is one part of the comparison on the number clinical hours for AAs:
Anesthesia Clinical Education: No minimum number of anesthesia cases required in CAAHEP accreditation criteria. AA programs indicate that total clinical hours range from 2000 to 2718. Published descriptions of the AA programs' total clinical hours, greater in number than anesthesia hours, include experiences apart from anesthesia time (e.g., learning to do physicals, taking patient histories, training and certification processes for life support training, and other learning experiences that a licensed professional RN has already mastered prior to nurse anesthesia program entry).
Survey on public opinion of AAs...
http://www.scienceblog.com/community/older/archives/K/0/pub0888.html
Here is blog from an AA about their daily life as an AA.
https://aajobsearch.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=49&PN=1