Published
Hi again,
Thank you all for your responses. I think in my enthusiasm at finding a forum where nurses were open to supporting and sharing their opions with each other, I have miscommunicated the intent of my question. So, here's another go at it.
I am a 1st year student in nursing. I am involved in producing on-line learning modules for post secondary education. My current project involves pathphys for nursing. As I have yet to cover the subject area, I turned to the web and others in the profession for their opinion. So, here's my rephrase....
In your experience, what areas of pathphys have been the hardest to understand or could be improved upon in the way that it is taught? What I am trying to identify is the areas that could benefit from a multimedia approach. I agree that if there is a multimedia (or any other method of teaching) all subject areas are important. However in this intial stage of the project our goal is to tackle the areas that are hardest first and once a structure has been set up the rest will follow.
I hope this clarifies my query. Thus far, nurses (instructors and new grads) that I have spoken to have identified cardio (and reading leads), endocrine, and neuro as areas that they felt is not well taught or could benefit from an interactive multimedia approach.
Thanks again,
Mingus.
mingus
3 Posts
Hello!
I would like to ask nurses in pathphys (or any nursing field) what they think are important aspects of pathphys. Is it cardio and reading leads? Is it renal? What would be your top three (or more) areas in pathphys that you think are a MUST KNOW??
Thanks everyone!
Mingus