Published
I agree with your rationales.
#1 is not cost effective to me because a terminally ill patient would need hospice care instead of palliative care if my understanding of the two is correct (hospice/palliative care nurses/anyone feel free to jump in if I am incorrect).
#5 I would see as cost effective because you are preventing infection and other complications by using clean gloves to change the dressing.
I think they can all be rationalized as cost effective.
In addition to the answers above.
You would probably waste money trying to provide curative treatment to a terminal patient. Ex: surgery/chemo/radiation/inpatient hospitalization for a dying cancer patient versus just pain meds/home care to provide comfort.
LoveER01
8 Posts
I am stuck on a question about cost effective care. I have several of my books with me but none explain it. What in the following scenarios constitutes cost effective care to a patient?
1. Providing palliative care to a terminally ill client.
2. Beginning discharge planning on admit.
3. Counseling clients on cigarette smoking cessation.
4. Educating a group of parents on the importance of childhood immunizations.
5. Performing a postop wound dressing change using clean gloves.
From what I kind of understand, 3 and 4 are cost effective, right? Because they are preventive measures that would hopefully prevent health complications which would prevent more money being spent on medical care...
I think 2 may be cost effective because a plan is being put in motion to help the patient get out of the hospital and hopefully keep the patient from another admit if planning is adequate.
I am saying no to 1 because they are already sick and all they can get is comfort care.
5, I am unsure. Clean gloves obviously will prevent as much contamination as possible... ??? Help!