Published Jul 18, 2009
alpha2009
6 Posts
who would respond, thank you:bow:
being an IEN...talking about California, there is a good thread here explaining why it is unwise to get the initial licensure especially if one has no SSN#.
but a positive NCLEX result can still be used on applying to other state thru a licensure by examination route (as what I have learned here).
What difference does it make now?:urgycld:
5cats
613 Posts
Let's say initially it saves you money, and you don't risk loosing your NCLEX results when applying to a different board that doesn't destroy your files.
California for some reason is a dream of many and only very few succeed at the end.
Silverdragon102, BSN
1 Article; 39,477 Posts
Many people use Ca because they do their own assessment of transcripts however Ca will destroy your file after 3 years if you do not provide a SSN or ask for a extension. Before retrogression that wasn't too big a problem but if you planned on working in another state then you still had to meet requiremetns and can not endorse as you need a license to endorse.
Ginger's Mom, MSN, RN
3,181 Posts
Also CA BON is now closed 3 out of 4 Fridays which will reduce productivity. With retrogression what is the hurry?