Published Jan 22, 2007
NRSKarenRN, BSN, RN
10 Articles; 18,929 Posts
from:
texas board of nursing bulletin - january 2007
texas bon draft position statement targets nursing work hours
...in collaboration with the texas nurses
association (tna) and their
governmental affairs committee
(gac), the board charged the nursing
practice advisory committee (npac)
at the october 2006 board meeting to
develop a position statement on nursing
work hours and the impact on nursing
errors and patient safety....
...the draft position statement
incorporates the research on nursing
work hours. in addition, the npac
members agreed that ongoing
collaboration between nurses and
employers is necessary to assure patient
safety through schedules and staffing
plans that allow for adequate rest and
recuperation time for the nurse.
readers of the bne bulletin are invited
to participate in an online survey
concerning this draft position statement
at http://www.bne.state.tx.us/practice/
workhoursurvey.html
nurses and the
public will have an additional
opportunity to provide input on the
nursing work hours position statement
by attending a public hearing on this
issue to be held wednesday, april 18,
2007. the board will consider adoption
of this position statement at the regularly
scheduled board meeting april 19, 2007.
see newsletter: ftp://www.bne.state.tx.us/jan07.pdf
article starts pg 1; statement on pg 4-5. karen
RN34TX
1,383 Posts
Well I don't know about all that.
If the Texas BNE is so concerned about patient safety and errors I think that thay could better spend their time and energy discussing the widespread practice of dangerous staffing ratios in Texas hospitals.
Besides that, I know what I can handle as far as work hours go and do not not need the BNE interfering with a paternalistic "Father Knows Best" position statement on what my work hours should be. I'm an experienced professional who can and should be left with full autonomy with regard to my work hours. I can regulate myself thank you.
I'm a healthy adult and perfectly capable of doing 4 12-hour shifts consecutively. (Their position statement recommends no more than 3).
With that said, I know that some people cannot handle 12-hour shifts period let alone more than 3 in a row, and I know that in some facilities the nurses aren't given a choice.
No one should be forced to work those kinds of hours if they aren't able or willing to do so and if this position statement prevents that from happening, then that's great.
However, I wouldn't want to see it being used to regulate someone's work hours who chooses to do so because they want a long stretch of days off without using vacation, school schedules, childcare issues, or for whatever their reasons are for doing 16-hour shifts or 4 or 5 12-hour shifts in a row.
bonodonnaonaroll
45 Posts
Absoutly agree with previous poster. At my current location the Nurses are taking average6-7 patients (Med-Surg), usually with no NA. Occassionally they have had to take up to 9!
Why can't the board mandate staffing ratios?
Julie