Published
OK, work is driving me NUTS! I want as many opinions as possible on this issue.
OK
Write the order.
Assuming it's Medicare, I write SN 1-3 W6. With PPS, it doesn't matter, you are not paid per visit, only per episode. So who cares if it is higly specific?
Before PPS, my old super at my first HH job said show a decreaase in frequency, Meidcare likes to see that. SO for above pt, 2-3W3 then 1-2W3 for example.
my NEXT JOB, WAS AFTER pps STARTED, THEY SAID IT MADE NO DIFFERNCE to them (caps by accident sorry) 1-3 W9 for a cardiac pt was OK.
Now, back to former employer, they have deiced to show a decreasing frequency, but said it's for CHAP, they want to see an individualized POC.
Issue 2: SOC on a Saturday. My present agecny is making a federal case out of us writing 1W1, then 2-3 W3, then 1-2W2.
Sop we look more specific, knowing that if saturday is the last day of the week, we know we will only make one visit that week. BUT, my argument is 1-3 W 6 covers all of the above!! If we just go once on the saturday, we are still in compliance. If the chart is reviewed, the examiner should see the visit frequency decrease as the pt improves. I swear it's a control issue.
NOW I can admit I see the usefulness of 1W1 for a daily wound, which, if I opened on a Saturday I would write 1W1, then 5-7W3, the 3-5W3, then 1-3W3. I completely see the rationale in that, since 5-7 for 4 weeks would put us out of compliance for week 1. AND, it makes perfect sense to show a decreased freq for a daily wound, even if we need to write a 487 later to cover ongoing daily visits.
Is anyone else's agency this picky? I mean my former agency couldn't care less, they just wanted it to be easy for the nurses, so that it was hard to be out of compliance with the orders. We had a state inspection while I was there, and they had no problem with this issue. I honestly think it's a control issue. The supervisor told me she changed my order, which if I had made an error, I would not mind, but in my mind, no error was made, since a sat visit is still within the 1-3 range of # of visits that week. Frankly if they want to change it , it truly makes NO DIFFERENCE, so I figure knock yourself out. The other supervisor, they are NEVER consistent, said at a meeting, they went on and on around the room on this issue, and as far as she could tell, there was no decision made, so is this just that the other supervisor thinks it is the right way to do it? And wants everyone to do it her way?? Why must they nitpick every piece of paper? NEVER do they say, wow, you reaLLY WENT THE EXTRA MILE FOR THIS PT. (caps again, it's this tiny laptop.)
So, tell me how you would write orders for the follwing scenarios...
New diabetic, vs wnl, but fbs 378 on admit visit. Ct needed freq direction while admin self-inj for second time. It is Thursday, you need to visit tomorrow for sure to watch the inject again, and check sugar, ct's glucomter hasn't arrived yet. He;s Medicare. Write your orders.
Old diabetic with removal of infected skin graft s/p partial foot amputation. Orders are daily NS wet-to dry. Pt lives alone, has no willing CG, he is also arthritic and cannot reach or render wound care himself. Mediacre. It is Friday first visit.
Saturday, new CVA pt with BP on admit of 198/72, and 172/68 other arm. Asymptomatic of HTN (no H/A), CT scan per wife, in hospital, showed mult CVA's past and present, they had no idea he ever had a CVA in the past. Ct has not taken any of his meds yet, NOrvasc, Lopressor, Dyazide, etc. SN thinks he should have a visit on Sunday again later in afternoon, to see if taking meds amde any differnce. After SN reviews actions and se of all meds and new meds ecotrin and plavix, wife decides she is not filling rx for these as ct had "rectal hemorhage" 6 months ago and was told never to take asa. Doc on-call doesn't know pt, of course, OK with BP recheck since asymptomatic, and can hole plavix and asa one day w/o a crisis. Pt will also get PT and ST eval. Write orders for SN freq.
OK, sorry for any typos, I'm tired and wanted to get this down while fresh in my head.