Saunders is making me mad
Featured Replies
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Currently Reading 0
- No registered users viewing this page.
A better way to browse. Learn more.
A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.
Here's the question.
A nurse witnesses an automobile accident, and provides care to a child with an open wound. The family is so greatful that they offer the nurse monetary compensation. The nurse does not want to offend the family, so she accepts. The child later develops sepsis and dies. The family files suit. The nurse understands that which of the following statements would be accurate regarding immunity from the suit?
1) The Good Samaritan Act will protect the nurse.
2) The Good Samaritan Act will protect the nurse if the nurse's care was not negligent.
3) The Good Samaritan Act will not provide immunity from the suit if the nurse accepted compensation for the care provided.
4) The Good Samaritan Act protects only laypersons providing care and not health professionals.
I put 3 and it marked it wrong and told me it was 4. :uhoh21: Um... am I dumb here, or not reading the question right? I've had a few questions like this so far in Saunders that have been really odd and wrong from everything I learned. Is the NCLEX going to be THIS much harder than I am expecting?