Published Apr 2, 2006
Tony35NYC
510 Posts
Have any of you read this article?
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060402/ap_on_he_me/easier_heart_valves;_ylt=AqI7syPKaTOQMcJmO59uR7Ws0NUE;_ylu=X3oDMTA3czJjNGZoBHNlYwM3NTE-
indigo girl
5,173 Posts
Wow! Are there problems with rejecting horse or pig tissue?
suzanne4, RN
26,410 Posts
Not rejecting, but they only last for so long. Remember that humans out live horses and pigs.
zacarias, ASN, RN
1,338 Posts
Of course this is just talking about valve replacements, not coronary artery bypasses.
TennRN2004
239 Posts
We have several surgeons who are doing the minimally invasive valve replacement/repair surgeries. As far as I can remember though, all of them have been cannulated and put on bypass.
Most surgeons will quote you about 5 years for tissue valves versus 20 years or more with mechanical valves. Several things play a factor in deciding what type of valves to use. If you have an early 40's patient, they'll often get the mechanical valve, because odds are they'll still be here in 5 years and not want to go through the surgery again for a new valve. If you have a 80's year old patient, docs may recommend tissue valve to them, partly because of age and life expectancy, but mostly because mechanical valve patients are on life long anticoagulant therapy. Coumadin in the 80 year who falls and breaks a hip is a nightmare.