What I do for a living is complicated. I try to prevent REALLY bad things from happening to my clients, and when they do, I contain, control, and mitigate the fallout. Many times these things end up at the intersection of the law and healthcare.
Because of the decisions that I have to make, ethics, justice, and morality must guide my hand. For those reasons I have a deep understanding and knowledge of ethics and philosophy. My logic must also be perfect as well.
banterings replied to ethics&modesty's topic in General Students
While these sessions focus on the technical aspects of the exam and to a lesser extent patient comfort, the sessions all start out with the ASSUMPTION of consent. Many times other providers are...
I would also recommend that you introduce yourself, ask the patient if he has been explained the purpose of your presence and if the patient has consented to you being there. If the NP, physician,...
I would rather say my peace 2 months late than leave something un said. No regrets. If you ever participated in philosophic debate, it is all about the pedanticalness and formalities. The Socratic...
AbigailJo, I suspect that you might have been referring to me. I was not mocking you but attempting to stimulate critical thinking on your part so that you might arrive at a conclusion yourself. I was...
banterings replied to Flightless Bird's topic in General Nursing
Either you are thinking about BBQ ribs or you REALLY, REALLY NEED to visit the CDC's Zombie Preparedness†web page. …of course you could just be a zombie who likes BBQ ribs
First off, I have never defended Wakefield or his study if that is what you are implying. So why bring him up at all? It seems that you equate anything that is not your view to Wakefield, so it must...
I just thought of another case of science that has changed. Look at CA screenings recommended for men and women and how they changed. PEs and PAPs for women annually starting around the age of 15,...