wtbcrna MSN, DNP, CRNA

Anesthesia

allnurses Guide
  • Content

    5,128
  • Visitors

    58,515
  • Followers

    3
  • Likes

    405

All Content by wtbcrna

  1. How do you know the reliability of any of the information on that website? It is more important to utilize peer-reviewed scientific literature when making an EBP decision than website that does not...
  2. It has been asked, and there are studies out there. There has not been shown to have any significant differences being uncircumcised versus circumcised. There are some studies that show an increase...
  3. Anesthesia is extremely safe, but a newborn male circumcision is considerably less complicated than male circumcision done when older. The rate of complications increases with age. There are numerous...
  4. You are missing the point. HCPs should be given unbiased information based on scientific literature about male circumcision personal beliefs are not important, and neither are mine. Our individual...
  5. The myriads amount of scientific data don't persuade you that HCPs should be given unbiased information about the risks and benefits of male circumcision. That is the whole point. Why shouldn't...
  6. That is only half-true. The studies on HIV and male circumcision have mainly been done in Africa that isn't true for the rest of the studies on the benefits of male circumcision. Male circumcision...
  7. Both are untrue. UTI risk is statistically significant, and several of the studies were not done in Africa, but I guess the billions of dollars that it would cost for a 10% drop in circumcision rates...
  8. That would be BS, and you have yet to provide one research article to prove there is no medical/public health benefits to male
  9. Good for you, and he still only has about 1% chance of needing medical intervention for phimosis not to mention the increased risk of STIs, the risk of spreading cervical cancer, slight increase...
  10. Now you cannot dispute the public health benefits, so your response is that Europe doesn't recommend RIC. Then in the U.S.A. the CDC shouldn't provide resources to educate HCPs on the risks and...
  11. There are no documented health benefits to FGM, if you have some present them. That still does not change the fact that there is no real comparison between male circumcision and
  12. http://www.mayoclinicproceedings.org/article/S0025-6196(14)00036-6/fulltext And your response to the cost benefit ratio that was directly correlated to Europe in this systematic literature review. Is...
  13. That is called anecdotal
  14. That is assuming that the cancer only originated in that part of the body, and that is removed prior to any cancer cells forming. That also presumes that whatever the tissue that the cancer originated...
  15. Then prove this research/evidence. I provided one systematic review and one meta-analysis to support the view that male circumcision has many public/medical benefits. I also provided the AAP position...
  16. Provide a research article to substantiate your claim, since it is well documented that female genital mutilation often causes infection along with many other problems. I provided the WHO page on FGM...
  17. So again back to the whole crux of the thread, are you saying you are against the CDC providing unbiased information to HCPs on the risk and benefits of male circumcision. The consent argument...
  18. wtbcrna

    who has taken a pay cut, willingly

    I am losing my USAF multi-year bonus pay as CRNA in order to attend nursing PhD school full time while on active-duty. That is going to cost me 360k over 9 years. I still will have to deploy as CRNA...
  19. The whole point of the thread is the CDC justified in offering HCPs educational material on the risks and benefits of male circumcision. We all know there is a large cultural and religious component...
  20. There is no comparison. There is absolutely no medical or public health benefit from female genital mutilation. [h=1]"Female genital mutilation[/h]Fact sheet N°241 Updated February 2014 [h=3]Key...
  21. So the CDC is also just basing their tentative decision on out dated information too.? Is that what you are trying to
  22. A lot of has changed since 1978. I don't know of any anesthesia provider that would induce with a narcotic for shoulder arthroscopy. I would recommend bringing your entire anesthesia records next...
  23. Actually, you would say that is how EBP works. You change the practice to reflect current
  24. There is no equivalent. There is no comparison. It doesn't matter how minor the female "circumcision" is it will never be comparable thing to male
  25. When there is a medical and public health benefit with no decrease in function from female circumcision then it will be appropriate comparison to male circumcision until then there is no appropriate...