Overhaul of health care system needed to address nursing understaffing?

Nurses General Nursing

Published

It seems as though the nursing profession, esp hospital nursing, has reached some dire straits in the past 15 years - getting worse, in particular, over this past decade. Would you agree?

The patient load is simply too high. Insanely so, and yet now these ratios are hard-stamped into the system due, in large part, to the way managed care reimburses hospitals. And, of course, the way managed care reimburses hospitals is rooted in a complex array of factors - more patients, more older patients, more obese patients, ever-changing medical technology, just plain more demands placed on the health care system.

As I read through these posts, I'm simply amazed at the case loads being described - and so consistently! Such case loads are just not rational, and yet there they are, with hospitals treating them as though they're normal.

It looks as though the only thing that can solve the nursing staffing problem is an overhaul of the health care system that embraces some tough realities. Such a (theoretical) overhaul, I think, would mandate absolutely no more than 4 patients per, say, a med/surg unit RN (with an aim of 3:1), with no corresponding sacrifice of ancillary staff. And because this would take an overhaul of the system to realize this, and would address a problem that affects the public health mightily, I really think the feds need to do it.

It may mean hospitals, to find the money to do this, will have to close beds, will have to stop accepting so many patients - perhaps triage will have to intensify - and perhaps the feds will have to set aside money to fund hospitals to keep them afloat. And that will mean other fed-funded programs will have to get cut.

And hospital admin people (MSHA's, etc.) AND staff nurses will have to put their heads together to figure out how to overhaul the system. Staff nurses simply must be part of the health care reform process. THEY know the realities. The "suits" don't.

If this goal is achieved, maybe there wouldn't be such a "nursing shortage". Maybe all those thousands of current nurses out there would return to the hospital. It looks as though we certainly have enough nurses "out there", not to mention the ones being churned out of the schools yearly. But there are so few who want to STAY at the bedside, in such working conditions - we can keep churning and churning, and importing and importing, but this will serve as only a stop-gap measure.

But... maybe that is what the "system" has settled for - constant stop-gap instead of real retention.

Anyway, I've just seen so many posts about nursing burnout and insane case loads, and observations about how "nursing is just not the same anymore" (I believe it!), that I don't think any amount of stress management skills or even changing one facility at a time (unless we can follow the example of a "model facility") will do anything to improve the worsening nursing situation.

If any silver lining comes out of the current systemic understaffing of hospitals, maybe it will be an increased emphasis on preventive health - i.e., the government tacitly warning us to try our best NOT to become an inpatient!

Anyway, just my $0.02. I think I'm basically writing this out of fear - fear of what I will encounter when I graduate from nursing school. I hear about "reality shock"; but I think it's much more than that - I think it's a shock that we need to listen to - a shock at a system gone awry.

Because they say only a newcomer to a country can really see the essence of that locale - during those first few days or weeks he/she is dwelling in that locale - before becoming acclimated. Then, once acclimation sets in, surroundings take on an appearance of normalcy, and some of the truth that was contained in that initial glimpse into the "reality of it all" is lost.

You could say shock is the only really rational reaction to the current situation!

If we - the public - accept today's nursing working conditions as normal, it will only get worse. I fear what the bedside will look like in 10 years. Maybe the fact that the aging boomer generation (the "gray tsunami") is about to hit the hospitals will help the public face reality...

Specializes in ICU-CVICU.

Do the BSN prepared nurses use that extra education to do anything concrete about improving the working conditions for nurses or the nurse/patient ratio, or do they escape the world of hospital nursing as soon as they possibly can?

I'm smart enough to recognize danger and stay away from it. I have no interest in putting my license at risk. Fortunately, staffing and ratios haven't been an issue for me either in the ICU or the CVICU.

And by the way, aren't BSN nurses still the vast minority? Just wondering how such a small number of "ivory tower" nurses can be responsible for so many problems.

So, while the BSN prepared nurse is getting that experience (s)he cannot carry a full patient load, and the unit remains inadequately staffed. The problem we were originally discussing was that the BSN education was not appropriate for the duties the student would face on the job immediately after graduation.

Do the BSN prepared nurses use that extra education to do anything concrete about improving the working conditions for nurses or the nurse/patient ratio, or do they escape the world of hospital nursing as soon as they possibly can?

The BSN prepared nurses would love to do concrete things like improving working conditins, improving nurse-patient ratios, but unfortunately, we get not support from Diploma prepared and ADN nurses who did not receive anything but but nursing care education in their programs. We beat our heads against the wall trying to get these individuals to see what needs to change, but we are beating a dead horse. We cannot do it alone. We ALL HAVE TO WORK TOGETHER TO MAKE THE NECESSARY CHANGES TO MAKE A DIFFERANCE. They do not have the desire to change, and wish to maintain the status quo. They can then spend their career spinning there wheels, going nowhere, and watching the hospitals and nursing homes whittle and dumb down our professional practice. Nurses are ignorant on how to fight back.

BSN grads, on the other hand, are able to take classes in management, alternative careers for nurses, discuss workplace issues, such how unionization of the nursing profession can improve the above issues, legal issues, public speaking, leadership, assertive training, etc. We leave bedside nursing because when get no from other nurses who can't see the forest for the trees. They are too busy trying to care for there 10+ patients to be able to effectively put forth the effort to affect change in the workplace. Which of course, is exactly what the hospitals want. "Idle hands are the work of the devil", and nurses who are not overwhelmed in the workplace would have time to sit (idle) and discuss how unhappy they are, and what steps that they can take to change it and make things better.

I consider these to be "quality of life" classes. They teach the nurse how to navigate the muddy waters of nursing employment. I would add classes like "Employment Law", Administrative Law", and "Insurance Law". Nurses are quite naive when it comes to knowing what their rights are in the workplace, and what measures they can take to protect themselves. They have no idea how to utilize our legal system, and therefore are self made victims of employer abuse. Ignorance is not bliss when you are a nurse.

Being able to "hit the ground running" the day after graduation, is more a quality of needing to validate your self worth and self importance to make up for the lack of at least a four year college degree, that would make us professional equals of other health care professionals, rather than starting ones career as a professional underdog.

That is more important than being able to function at 100% the day after graduation, which only benefits the hospital.

Lindarn, RN, BSN, CCRN

Spokane, Washington

I'm smart enough to recognize danger and stay away from it. I have no interest in putting my license at risk. Fortunately, staffing and ratios haven't been an issue for me either in the ICU or the CVICU.

And by the way, aren't BSN nurses still the vast minority? Just wondering how such a small number of "ivory tower" nurses can be responsible for so many problems.

I don't think we're implying BSN nurses are responsible for all the problems in nursing - no, not at all! I guess we've strayed from the subject of this thread...

I see a multi-factorial problem where case loads are too dang high, respect too low, required documentation excessive, and nurses too exhausted to try to "fight City Hall" after a full day's work, not to mention the normal stresses of maintaining a family life.

I don't see that the solutions to the nursing problem are simple. Certainly the BSN vs. ADN vs. diploma issue will not redress the problem of hospitals simply not hiring enough nurses or sending them home or to other units when the "census is low".

Anyway, I, too, am trying to recognize the danger of what I'd be leaping into post-graduation. Med/surg seems a great training ground, but.... those ratios are just out of this world.

Bedside nursing seems a bit like a madhouse, and I don't want to see myself going crazy.

The BSN prepared nurses would love to do concrete things like improving working conditins, improving nurse-patient ratios, but unfortunately, we get not support from Diploma prepared and ADN nurses who did not receive anything but but nursing care education in their programs. We beat our heads against the wall trying to get these individuals to see what needs to change, but we are beating a dead horse. We cannot do it alone. We ALL HAVE TO WORK TOGETHER TO MAKE THE NECESSARY CHANGES TO MAKE A DIFFERANCE. They do not have the desire to change, and wish to maintain the status quo. They can then spend their career spinning there wheels, going nowhere, and watching the hospitals and nursing homes whittle and dumb down our professional practice. Nurses are ignorant on how to fight back.

BSN grads, on the other hand, are able to take classes in management, alternative careers for nurses, discuss workplace issues, such how unionization of the nursing profession can improve the above issues, legal issues, public speaking, leadership, assertive training, etc. We leave bedside nursing because when get no from other nurses who can't see the forest for the trees. They are too busy trying to care for there 10+ patients to be able to effectively put forth the effort to affect change in the workplace. Which of course, is exactly what the hospitals want. "Idle hands are the work of the devil", and nurses who are not overwhelmed in the workplace would have time to sit (idle) and discuss how unhappy they are, and what steps that they can take to change it and make things better.

I consider these to be "quality of life" classes. They teach the nurse how to navigate the muddy waters of nursing employment. I would add classes like "Employment Law", Administrative Law", and "Insurance Law". Nurses are quite naive when it comes to knowing what their rights are in the workplace, and what measures they can take to protect themselves. They have no idea how to utilize our legal system, and therefore are self made victims of employer abuse. Ignorance is not bliss when you are a nurse.

Being able to "hit the ground running" the day after graduation, is more a quality of needing to validate your self worth and self importance to make up for the lack of at least a four year college degree, that would make us professional equals of other health care professionals, rather than starting ones career as a professional underdog.

That is more important than being able to function at 100% the day after graduation, which only benefits the hospital.

Lindarn, RN, BSN, CCRN

Spokane, Washington

Your answer proves my point! This division of ranks in nursing was originally begun after the "White Paper" issued by the so-called "leaders" with the advanced collegiate degrees. We don't like to attribute to malice that which can be explained by simple incompetence, and we sincerely hope that this effect was a case of unexpected results.

When the nurses in the executive and educational hierarchy do not respect the role of the bedside nurses, why should we expect the hospital business administrators to do so? Where are the good "old-fashioned" head nurses who felt it was their responsibility to look after the welfare of their staff, and made it a point to see that everyone in their unit got a decent lunch break and their staff nurses's schedules allowed them to get enough sleep to maintain their health? Where are the directors of nursing who would not ask their staff to do anything that they themselves were not willing to do?

When you say you get no help from diploma and ADN nurses, all you really seem to want them to do is go back to school and spend thousands of dollars on getting those magic initials behind their names because you seem to think that it will make them the equals of other professions. Why are we not strong enough to stand up and say that nursing is not just another profession, and we don't need to be equal to anyone. We are different, and we set our own standards for education and promotion based on peerformance.

A consistent theme in the threads on these and other nursing blogs is that people are getting their BSN, MSN, etc., to essentially get away from the bedside (I can't blame them, given today's case loads). One higher education guru has said that nurses have all the incentive to get a higher degree to get away from the bedside, and not enough to stay at bedside.

So, I went to public health school, got my master's, and afterwards attended an accelerated 1-year BSN program for a while. Let me tell you, the theory in both programs bordered on academic blarney. Maybe it was just the program I was in - but I've now opted for a 2-year ADN nursing program, which is vastly superior to the BSN program I was in.

I'm not saying "BSN bad, lesser degree good" - esp since programs will vary inevitably. I'm just saying that, with the health care system in the crisis that it's in - wiith so many demands, too few staff, more complex treatment protocols - that we have to get practical about things and really train people in a practical way.

And I'm not saying, to heck with learning theory and scientific rationale. But I do wish those diploma programs would return. Or, at least perhaps nursing programs that are more modeled after med school programs, in that they would have a relatively brief, intense upfront didactic period (as in, reading up on diseases, their treatment, and nursing interventions w/rationales), followed by an intensely clinical one, where students are actually doing what they'd do as nurses in the real world, albeit under supervision.

Maybe there's not enough clinical site space to go around for such programs anymore, or maybe we place too much emphasis on ivory-tower theory (this latter problem is more easily solvable) - but those diploma programs perhaps should be revisited.

...

Anyway, sorry to stray from the subject. But, better preparation of nurses, as in, intense instruction in an actual clinical setting, sounds like a good idea, if doable these days. As far as making nurses into advocates - maybe nursing schools could intensely instill that, too.

Although I don't want to get into an ADN vs. diploma vs. BSN debate - I guess it's such a universal topic that it inevitably gets brought up. And it does have relevance esp since BSN and higher degrees are essentially a "ticket out" of the bedside setting. (Again, I don't blame a soul for opting for that ticket.)

As for the BSN empowering bedside nurses - I can't tell that BSN equips nurses more for "standing up to the system". Wouldn't having a degree that allows one to "escape the bedside" actually reduce the incentive to stand up to & protest the system, since one could just leave the system instead?

I think you understand the present sytem very well. As long as we continue educating nurses to escape the Med-Surg scene, that is what they will do, and why should anyone be surprised when patient care suffers?

Your answer proves my point! This division of ranks in nursing was originally begun after the "White Paper" issued by the so-called "leaders" with the advanced collegiate degrees. We don't like to attribute to malice that which can be explained by simple incompetence, and we sincerely hope that this effect was a case of unexpected results.

When the nurses in the executive and educational hierarchy do not respect the role of the bedside nurses, why should we expect the hospital business administrators to do so? Where are the good "old-fashioned" head nurses who felt it was their responsibility to look after the welfare of their staff, and made it a point to see that everyone in their unit got a decent lunch break and their staff nurses's schedules allowed them to get enough sleep to maintain their health? Where are the directors of nursing who would not ask their staff to do anything that they themselves were not willing to do?

When you say you get no help from diploma and ADN nurses, all you really seem to want them to do is go back to school and spend thousands of dollars on getting those magic initials behind their names because you seem to think that it will make them the equals of other professions. Why are we not strong enough to stand up and say that nursing is not just another profession, and we don't need to be equal to anyone. We are different, and we set our own standards for education and promotion based on peerformance.

And the result of that is a profession who is looked down on as "professional wannabees", who refuse and deride further education, and who are treated as such as evidenced by our low pay, poor working conditions, and have absolutely no contol over our profession or professional practice.

Complaining that "Nurse executives" do not respect nurses is self defeating. We do not respect ourselves or our profession to follow the succesful path of other health care professionals.

The old fashioned "head nurse" is gone, as is the benevolent health care administrater. This is a differant century, and attitude. The "good old days" are gone, and so is the old head nurse. We must change with the times. Nursing is stuck in a 19th century mentality, and it does not work. Let me tell you the facts of life. Nurses have to PROVE that they are worthy of the professional workplace conditions, and pay. That is done by jumping throught the educational hoops, and educating ourselves like other health care professionals.

We do that by "playing the game". That is what other health care professionals have done and it has worked. They made themselves look like they are important, not just whined about it. They put their money where their mouth is and came up on top.

We need to look out for ourselves, not wait for someone else to do it. We have to change to make it better. If potential nurses cannot afford, or find a way to attend college for four years to become nurses, than "oh well". That is life. PTs and OTs don't bemoan the fact their educational levels keeps out many potential candidates. Are they upset? No at all. They are happy that there are barriers to enter their profession, because it keeps their numbers down, keeps them in demand, and they are laughing all the way to the bank.

ADN and Diploma nurses will be grandfathered in and not have to to earn a BSN to be able to work. No one will be asked to pony up $$$$ to earn a BSN.

But the time has come to change. We have delayed it enough.

Lindarn, RN, BSN, CCRN

Spokane, Washington

+ Add a Comment