nursing research

Published

]Hi everyone,

]I have a Critique assignment and I am having a hard time getting started. Does anyone have any ideas?:idea: please, please, help me out!

:monkeydance:thanks!

Specializes in Trauma,ER,CCU/OHU/Nsg Ed/Nsg Research.

Do you need help picking an article? Is there a specific topic you're supposed to be covering?

Specializes in Education, FP, LNC, Forensics, ED, OB.

hello and welcomeblurred.gif to allnurses.com

so good to have you.

i moved your thread to the nursing student assistance forum for a better response.

you need to tell us what your assignment is about in order to better serve you.

Specializes in med/surg, telemetry, IV therapy, mgmt.

Have you ever had to take a class in art, music or theatre appreciation? These classes usually have you go to a museum, concert or a play and critique what you saw. This is the same thing with the difference being that you are going to read an article that summarizes a nurse's research and get a chance to break it down into it's component parts and comment about it.

To critique a research article you need to know what the elements of and process of research are. It is helpful to have a nursing research textbook to help you do this. If you don't have one, you might check your school library for any textbooks or information on nursing research, scientific research or critiquing a research article. The librarian, if you're lucky a research librarian, should be able to help you with this.

The steps of research as they should appear in the official research report or an article (which is an abridged version) are as follows:

  1. Introduction: introduction of research problem introduction of objectives introduction of how objectives will be achieved (methodology), optional introduction of main findings and conclusions
  2. Literature review: review of previous work relating to research problem (to define, explain, justify) review of previous work relating to methodology (to define, explain, justify) review of previous work relating to results (particularly reliability, etc.)
  3. Method (how the results were achieved): explanation of how data was collected/generated, explanation of how data was analyzed explanation of methodological problems and their solutions or effects
  4. Results and discussion: presentation of results interpretation of results discussion of results (e.g. comparison with results in previous research, effects of methods used on the data obtained)
  5. Conclusions: has the research problem been "solved"? to what extent have the objectives been achieved? what has been learned from the results? how can this knowledge be used? what are the shortcomings of the research, or the research methodology? etc.

Basically, in a critique, you are going to either agree or disagree with steps #2 to #5 and explain why you feel that way.

Have fun!

Specializes in Gerontological, cardiac, med-surg, peds.
+ Join the Discussion