4,000 Nurses strike for patient care.

Nurses Union

Published

4,000 brave women and men, RNs from the California Nurses Association/National Nurses Organizing Committee, are spending this week on the picket lines outside of Sutter Health Hospitals throughout Northern California, on a 10-day strike over patient care issues. This is an important strike for a re-energized American labor movement and a key moment for the nation's battle for quality healthcare.

This is a long strike for any worker, but one that turns on the most basic issues of nursing and patient safety. Sutter Health is, even by HMO standards, an outlier in their push to cut corners on patient care in order to bump up corporate profits. You can't argue with their success on either count. In 2006, Sutter reported record profits of $587 million. Much of those profits come from routinely understaffing their hospital units by denying meal and rest breaks to nurses. As a practical matter, what this means is that if a nurse, in the midst of a 12-hour shift, decides to take her lunch break...then her patients lose coverage.

Hasn't every nurse faced that ethical dilemma? Grab a sandwich or make sure my sick patients are cared for? Especially for nurses, who define our work as "patient advocacy?" And, under California's landmark staffing law, it's no longer legal.

That's why these nurses had to walk out and make a personal sacrifice for the good of their patients and their profession.

Sutter's response? To embark on a campaign of harassment, intimidation, and lies. Sutter has threatened to fire strikers, cut off health benefits, has posted guards at nursing stations to glare at RNs, and has taken to regularly demonizing its own nurses in the press.

The good news? Sutter foolishly picked a fight with a group of (mostly) women who are not easily intimidated...especially by some corporate hack who have shown they don't care about patient care.

The better news? This strike affirms the relevance of America's labor movement to the key questions our country is undergoing. This strike has been marked by deep public support and sympathy, with Sutter Health's behavior roundly criticized by elected officials, the public, and the news media. High-profile strikes like this that win over the public make it easier for other groups of workers to stand up for their own rights. It's worth noting that the recent increase in the numbers of unionized workers has largely come from the ranks of healthcare workers--and that CNA/NNOC is the nation's fastest-growing union.

And the best news? The nurses of Sutter Health are demonstrating the way forward in our country's struggle for guaranteed healthcare. A major reason our health system is so dysfunctional is that corporations like Sutter Health have rigged the system and treat patients as profit-makers, not as human beings. If we can win patient safety advances at Sutter, we can win them across the country--especially if we inspire the nation's nurses to continue taking their patient advocacy from the bedside to the statehouse and even to the streets.

If these nurses inspire you, why not call the CEO of Sutter, Pat Fry at 916 286 6752 and tell him it's time to settle with the nurses!

For more on the Sutter fight and ongoing news, go to: www.calnurses.org

Specializes in Critical care, tele, Medical-Surgical.

Nurses, 2 Sutter hospitals have tentative pact

After 15 months of often barbed negotiations and three short strikes, union-represented registered nurses and two Bay Area hospitals affiliated with Sutter Health have reached tentative agreements on new contracts.

Nurses at the hospitals - Alta Bates Summit Medical Center, with three sites in Oakland and Berkeley, and Marin General Hospital - will now vote on whether to ratify the accord, which their negotiating teams have recommended.

The agreements announced Wednesday follow another tentative contract between the union, the California Nurses Association, and another Bay Area Sutter affiliate, Mills-Peninsula Health Services, reached Monday....

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2008/08/20/BU7R12F1IP.DTL

Specializes in ER,ICU,L+D,OR.

I think nurses in California just like to strike. People and other nurses see this as a positive event. I however have never found strikes to be useful. Maybe just overly emotional. I certainly see them as counter productive in my way of thinking.

Nurses in California hate to strike - or at least most of us do. But we have used the power of unity and militancy to win the best wages and benefits in the country, the only numerical staffing law in the country and other protections for nurses and patients.

Strikes are a small part, but an essential part of the orificenal for unionized nurses. Used in a dumb way, without adequate preparation or too often, they can be counterproductive. Used right, they are a vital tool. If you look at the total of new and renewal contracts negotiated in California in a typical year, in only about 3% or so is a strike part of the process.

I think nurses in California just like to strike. People and other nurses see this as a positive event. I however have never found strikes to be useful.

Better to have fought and lost than to have never fought at all.

Nurses in the Australian state of Victoria went on strike and delivered improvements both for themselves and their patients.

Perhaps you can explain how, if patient care is being compromised just how you can stop or even reverse it?

Specializes in ER,ICU,L+D,OR.
But we have used the power of unity and militancy to win the best wages and benefits in the country.

After 8 years of Bushism, I really do not like the term militancy. unity and militancy so you can get the best wages. No where does that speak anything of doing what is good for the patients, only what is good for the nurse. This is why I will never support unions. And as far as the best wages. I am not convinced of that. Not when you look at your cost of living in Cali and your tax base out there.

I feel we do far better for our patients here in Texas, and I feel that our level of achieving and earning a good life is better here also. And we do not have to be militant about it. I have never had any problems getting what I see as a needed for patients here in Texas Private Hosptal sector.

Specializes in ER,ICU,L+D,OR.
Better to have fought and lost than to have never fought at all.

Nurses in the Australian state of Victoria went on strike and delivered improvements both for themselves and their patients.

Perhaps you can explain how, if patient care is being compromised just how you can stop or even reverse it?

Actually it is far far better to runaway so you can fight another day. It was that kind of thinking that got England thrown out of America.

Actually, in Texas I really do not see patient care as being compromised. Maybe in Australia you have compromised care, But I do not see it in Texas.

After 8 years of Bushism, I really do not like the term militancy. unity and militancy so you can get the best wages. No where does that speak anything of doing what is good for the patients, only what is good for the nurse. This is why I will never support unions. And as far as the best wages. I am not convinced of that. Not when you look at your cost of living in Cali and your tax base out there.

I feel we do far better for our patients here in Texas, and I feel that our level of achieving and earning a good life is better here also. And we do not have to be militant about it. I have never had any problems getting what I see as a needed for patients here in Texas Private Hosptal sector.

From my Webster's Third International:

Militant: Agressively active in a cause, as "a militant suffragist"

Militancy has a tradition we should all be proud of. Militancy achieved the vote for women, rights for people of all races and much more. I'm proud to be a militant supporter of nurses' and patients' rights. The travelers who come from the "right to work" states tell us tales of taking care of 3 and 4 patients in the ICU and up to 10 on med-surg floors. Our militancy in California won us and our patients protection against that.

Specializes in Critical-care RN.
Actually it is far far better to runaway so you can fight another day. It was that kind of thinking that got England thrown out of America.

Actually, in Texas I really do not see patient care as being compromised. Maybe in Australia you have compromised care, But I do not see it in Texas.

Do me a favor, try new glasses and read this article... http://www.aflcio.org/joinaunion/voiceatwork/efca/efca_profile_mn.cfm

Actually it is far far better to runaway so you can fight another day. It was that kind of thinking that got England thrown out of America.

Actually, in Texas I really do not see patient care as being compromised. Maybe in Australia you have compromised care, But I do not see it in Texas.

This listserve is full of threads from Texas and Oklahoma nurses who are scared for their licenses due to the deplorable working conditions in hospitals. A group of Texas nurses just organized under NNNOC due to these conditions.

Either you are in la la land or you live in a different Texas than these nurses do. JMHO and my NY $0.02.

Lindarn, RN, BSN, CCRN

Spokane, Washington

Specializes in ER,ICU,L+D,OR.
Do me a favor, try new glasses and read this article... http://www.aflcio.org/joinaunion/voiceatwork/efca/efca_profile_mn.cfm

Actually, I have read the article. I was not impressed by the Dramatics described with it. If she is that unhappy, go work elsewhere. The Hospital can not be that bad and still pass accreditation inspections. Does not work that way.

Specializes in ER,ICU,L+D,OR.
This listserve is full of threads from Texas and Oklahoma nurses who are scared for their licenses due to the deplorable working conditions in hospitals. A group of Texas nurses just organized under NNNOC due to these conditions.

Either you are in la la land or you live in a different Texas than these nurses do. JMHO and my NY $0.02.

Lindarn, RN, BSN, CCRN

Spokane, Washington

Well to be fair there are a lot of nurses from Texas who do not complain. The hospitals here in DFW are very good. Now Ive seen nursing home nurses complain, seems to be in their nature. But not hospital nurses. But most of their complaints seem to have little substance, really being very dramatically poised actually.

Here is $0.01 back for your Union dues

Specializes in ICU/CCU/TRAUMA/ECMO/BURN/PACU/.
After 8 years of Bushism, I really do not like the term militancy. unity and militancy so you can get the best wages. No where does that speak anything of doing what is good for the patients, only what is good for the nurse. This is why I will never support unions.

:idea:Well, there it is! You just don't like unions, although in some of your previous posts, 46, you've tried to appear neutral. We've attempted to have a civil debate back and forth in the AN healthcare politics forums and you just can't seem to see beyond your anti-union bias to recognize that patients are safer when their nurse's role as a patient advocate is protected against unjust retaliation, (whether it be outright firing under the guise of an "at-will" employment clause in the employee handbook, unpaid suspension, and/or constructive discharge practices (selective schedule changes or vacation/day off denials/predatory audits/working condition changes, blackballing, etc.). Weingarten Rights and Just Cause Discipline are two of the most important non-economic benefits of union representation that are good for patients.

On the issue of fair wages, patients suffer when hospitals fail to offer competetive salaries to attract and retain enough nurses to provide the sophisticated and complex care, (assessment, planning, implementation, evaluation, education, advocacy and documentation), needed by patients. When hospitals hire layers upon layers of middle managers, and offer exhorbitant salaries and compensation packages to their executives, and pay consultants and union busters millions of dollars, patients suffer because their needs are for the skill and experience of direct care Registered Nurses. When the budget serves the interests of the management, at the expense of the interests of patients, direct care nurses have a duty and should have the protected right to exercise freedom of speech, and freedom of association to collectively advocate to change those circumstances that are against the interests of patients.

The public has a right to know. If it takes a strike, (and it rarely does), then so be it. If the nurses are on the outside, then there's something very wrong on the inside. Yes, we must engage in "elegant" militancy. When our weapons are facts, and our voice is collective, and we assert our rights as patient and professional nursing practice advocates in unity, our vision for health care is powerful. You may choose not to support unions; that's your right. As for our union, we'll continue to fight, as circumstances require, to remove any and all barriers to the ability of nurses to provide you and your loved ones, and all patients, with safe, therapeutic and effective care. To do that, we need a strong all RN union and professional association: CNA/NNOC!

Native American wisdom: "As individual fingers we can easily be broken, but all together we make a mighty fist."

Florence Nightingale: "It may seem a strange principle to enunciate as the very first requirement in a hospital that it should do the sick no harm." and,

"I think one's feelings waste themselves in words; they ought all to be distilled into actions which bring results.":up:

And, since you mentioned Bush, check this out: "Send Bush Packing"

http://www.sendbushpacking.com/

+ Add a Comment