Published
Hello Again,
Let me start off by saying that this post is not intended to offend/insult anyone! I want to hear peoples opinions and point of views on the matter, so PLEASE, do not have my head.
So, I have been reading quite a few post from nursing students who are now questioning if nursing is for them. Those questions are not based on their grades, its based on their experiences in the clinical sites. Some are grossed out by what they have seen, others claim they didn't think it would be like that, and more than a few don't think they are cut out for It, and do not have the patience to deal with "difficult" patients.
So this is my question; should nurses be required to be a CNA (for at least 3 months) before they enter the field of nursing?
Please remember, this is only a question not a recommendation in anyway. I am really curious because I have seen people spend all that money only to drop out because once exposed to the reality of nursing they find out that its not something they can handle. Also, it would prevent them from wasting their money, and or preventing other prospective students from getting into the program who would really love the nursing profession.
I would just like to say that many LTC's already have a revolving door especially for CNA's. I worked at one place in particular that I saw excellent, hard-working, strong and determined CNA's wrung of all their enthusiasm for the work; they were not slackers, they were intelligent, compassionate people. Their ratio was ridiculously absurd, and certainly the patients were at a terrible disadvantage, only getting perfunctory essential care performed as fast as possible in order to get all in their assignment done. And they went at full tilt for their entire 12 hours.
I hope SOMETHING will break this awful trend in patient care.
I would just like to say that many LTC's already have a revolving door especially for CNA's. I worked at one place in particular that I saw excellent, hard-working, strong and determined CNA's wrung of all their enthusiasm for the work; they were not slackers, they were intelligent, compassionate people. Their ratio was ridiculously absurd, and certainly the patients were at a terrible disadvantage, only getting perfunctory essential care performed as fast as possible in order to get all in their assignment done. And they went at full tilt for their entire 12 hours.I hope SOMETHING will break this awful trend in patient care.
Sad but I am afraid this trend will never change. Every federal and state budget seems to cut more and more from medicare/medicaid and those programs are where the vast majority of LTC income comes from. Hence higher ratios and stagnant or even less pay. If the facility doesn't get paid we sure don't get paid.
RescueNinjaKy
593 Posts
I'm going to have to disagree with you points.
It is not good idea to have it mandatory just to let some students know what nursing is like. They can all complain and say "I didn't know nursing was going to involve poop, or that it's so hard, what am I going to do?" all they want. They didn't do the research. If it's something you want to do, do some research first, find out what the job entails before investing time, money, and emotions. A simple search let's you know. I find that many of those who complain about it, dug their own hole and should face the consequences.
I will not stand for being required to spend extra time and money just because those who are uninformed and unmotivated didn't want to research on their prospective careers. Research is an important nursing skill. And if they are lazy enough to not research, then they should be left to their own choices.
And honestly all those cna skills don't take long to learn. One or two demonstration / practical session, follow up with some reinforcement in online videos, then constant practice when you're doing adls in clinicals pretty much makes sure you're learning the skill and hardly any time is taken out.