Published
Those are the ratios used in our NICU too (not California). 1:1 are few and far between; reserved for very unstable patients and fresh post-ops. I just had 4 patients the other night (3 CPAPs and a FG) due to short-staffing and multiple admissions on our shift. So, no advice for you. What were the ratios at your previous job?
I work in a level IV unit that has about 95 beds. For nurse to baby ratios, we do 2:1 for ECMO, 1:1 for titrating multiple drips or for just really sick kids and/or serious post-ops. Most of our babies are 1:2, and that covers most vents, all CPAP, and HFNC. We have a step down unit that is typically 1:3 but can be 1:4 if it gets crazy and usually if that happens you'll have discharged one by the end of the day.
I work in a 60 bed Level III unit. Admissions, CPAP, vents and stable HFJV/HFOV are 2 patients per RN. Other intensive care status patients are 1 of 3 patients cared for by 1 RN. Intermediate care (stepdown/PCU) patients are 1 of 4 infants in an assignment. This allows the bare minimum care to be given with no time for extra stuff. Pretty ridiculous. These decisions are dictated by state regulations and we have been fighting for better ratios for years, using NANN guidelines, to no avail. Family satisfaction scores (which sadly have become the benchmark by which quality care is given even though the two are often mutually exclusive) would improve if parents perceived that nurses had time to give that extra care.
mlang, BSN, MSN
35 Posts
I am an RN on a level 3 NICU in California. Our standard ratios for lower acuity NICU patients are 3:1 and 2:1 for higher acuity. We have had 4:1 when we are short staffed. I am relatively new at this hospital, but I have never experienced these ratios before. They say that the lower acuity patients qualify as a step down. I've never heard of that before and my previous CA NICU got hit pretty hard by the state for trying this. Any advice?