Michigan Preparing To Let Doctors Refuse To Treat Gays

Nurses Activism

Published

Doctors or other health care providers could not be disciplined or sued if they refuse to treat gay patients under legislation passed Wednesday by the Michigan House.

The bill allows health care workers to refuse service to anyone on moral, ethical or religious grounds.

The Republican dominated House passed the measure as dozens of Catholics looked on from the gallery. The Michigan Catholic Conference, which pushed for the bills, hosted a legislative day for Catholics on Wednesday at the state Capitol.

The bills now go the Senate, which also is controlled by Republicans.

The Conscientious Objector Policy Act would allow health care providers to assert their objection within 24 hours of when they receive notice of a patient or procedure with which they don't agree. However, it would prohibit emergency treatment to be refused.

Three other three bills that could affect LGBT health care were also passed by the House Wednesday which would exempt a health insurer or health facility from providing or covering a health care procedure that violated ethical, moral or religious principles reflected in their bylaws or mission statement.

Opponents of the bills said they're worried they would allow providers to refuse service for any reason. For example, they said an emergency medical technicians could refuse to answer a call from the residence of gay couple because they don't approve of homosexuality.

Rep. Chris Kolb (D-Ann Arbor) the first openly gay legislator in Michigan, pointed out that while the legislation prohibits racial discrimination by health care providers, it doesn't ban discrimination based on a person's sexual orientation.

"Are you telling me that a health care provider can deny me medical treatment because of my sexual orientation? I hope not," he said.

"I think it's a terrible slippery slope upon which we embark," said Rep. Jack Minore (D-Flint) before voting against the bill.

Paul A. Long, vice president for public policy for the Michigan Catholic Conference, said the bills promote the constitutional right to religious freedom.

"Individual and institutional health care providers can and should maintain their mission and their services without compromising faith-based teaching," he said in a written statement.

@: http://www.proudparenting.com/page.cfm?Sectionid=65&typeofsite=snippetdetail&ID=1204&snippetset=yes

:stone

Hockeytown I think you are on the right track. As I stated previously, I watched the preceedings on this bill and very little to nothing was mentioned about gays. They were speaking about procedures such as abortions. I believe I also stated that several top execs from our local hospitals spoke and that this is already the norm in the hospitals in the area. Does anyone work with a jehova witness? are concessions made them in any way? such as not hanging a transfusion? I am sure if concessions are being made at the major hospitals in michigan than it is occurring elsewhere. and Nicki what I find horrible is your uneducated slanderous response.

I have to agree with hypnotic, and marie. Totally rediculous.

I guess i can deny care for a Jehovah's Witness then, i dont agree with their religious practices. Anyone want to deny care to a Catholic or Pentacostal? Geeezzzzz!

Many have. ( or didn't you know?) refused treatment to Jehovah's Witnesses. When the right to be free begins to be corroded against ANY class, group, religion, sexual orientation, age etc. the rest of the freedom goes rather quickly.

How sad is this? In this day and age. I think I would like to start refusing to care for patient's whose religion goes against mine. It did say religious grounds. It should work both ways. Ex. Christian can refuse to care for a Muslim or Jehovah's Witness because their religions do not mesh. I should be able to refuse to care for a heterosexual patient because I do not agree with their lifestyle, whose to say that the heterosexual lifestyle is the norm....

This is just plan stupid, obviously people with nothing better to do than to think of ways to discriminate against a group of people...

Just FYI Jehovah's Witnesses are Christian. :)

Could homosexuals refuse to care for heterosexuals then?

Who are these neanderthals who are passing these laws? And who are these doctors who are refusing to treat people? When did the primary focus of healthcare shift from caring for the sick to politics. This has nothing at all to do with ethics, its pure and simple bigotry. If they are going to use discriminatory practices to decide who will benefit from their services they should retire from the healthcare field and go run private country clubs that offer memberships only to people who look like them, act like them, and believe in the same things they do. Some of these so-called Christians really ought to take a second look at the life of the man they claim to be following. Somehow I can't see Jesus scheming up a plot to slight or discriminate against any person who needed his help. In fact, he did exactly the opposite, and encouraged his followers to do the same.

Gay or no gay, this is bull. I hope the civil liberties groups in that state will challenge it in court.

Specializes in Vents, Telemetry, Home Care, Home infusion.

:smiley_ab

Time out for Administrative review.

+ Add a Comment