Published
Ugh. I have a vague memory of a hospice patient at a SNF (not one of mine, but I knew the patient and the staff) who was having significant secretions. Apparently the floor nurse on 11-7 called the on-call doc (for the facility, not hospice) and he said Lasix IM.... which. she. gave.
From what I recall hearing, it was a terrible ordeal. The patient was super uncomfortable from the shot and the SEs, and apparently it just made the secretions worse bcs fluid started coming out from his nose and mouth.
I try not to medicate for secretions unless they appear to be causing the patient distress or if they're really freaking the family out. Atropine is usually my preferred recommendation, since it's easier to administer vs levsin and less expensive then scopalamine.
I agree this order should have been questioned. I don't think it's appropriate. Keep us posted when you talk to your colleague... was it an effective intervention?
kat7464
69 Posts
A co-worker was at the bedside of an actively dying patient. Not unusual, this patient had copious secretions. She got an order for Lasix to give thru the patient's G-tube. His hospice Dx was Gastric CA. She completely bypassed hycosamine, scopalamine, glycopyrolate.
In my 7 years of hospice work I have never had a doc order Lasix for excessive secretions. I have not had a chance to speak with this nurse about her decision to pursue this order. It just got me thinking....is lasix ever appropriate at EOL for patients that are not in heart failure but nevertheless have tons of secretions?
I would love to hear thoughts, pathophys, experience, anything. I am completely acustomed to thinking that atopine, scop, and levsin are the only solutions. Thoughts, please.