I bought the LaChairty's Prioritization and Delegations book. I know alot of ppl have recommended it, but I just wanted to ask for other peoples opinions of what they thought of the book.
I feel that it is good for critical thinking and pathophysiology, but I find some of it to be confusing as well. Such as delegations: experienced vs new team personel (NA , GN, or LVN), and the department they are experienced in such that an ED nursing assistant can put a patient on a cardiac monitor?
The case scenarios seem alot harder than the actual NCLEX RN exam, or is it suppose to be that hard? I feel like I'm getting alot of them wrong bc im confused with what is defined by experienced and a new. It is written like that in the exam?
SunshineBSN
64 Posts
I bought the LaChairty's Prioritization and Delegations book. I know alot of ppl have recommended it, but I just wanted to ask for other peoples opinions of what they thought of the book.
I feel that it is good for critical thinking and pathophysiology, but I find some of it to be confusing as well. Such as delegations: experienced vs new team personel (NA , GN, or LVN), and the department they are experienced in such that an ED nursing assistant can put a patient on a cardiac monitor?
The case scenarios seem alot harder than the actual NCLEX RN exam, or is it suppose to be that hard? I feel like I'm getting alot of them wrong bc im confused with what is defined by experienced and a new. It is written like that in the exam?
Has anyone else found this book to be confusing?