Is the specialization of NP training.....
Featured Replies
This topic is now closed to further replies.
Currently Reading 0
- No registered users viewing this page.
A better way to browse. Learn more.
A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.
Hurting us????
I am merely posing this as a hypothetical question. I have pored through every posting on the pros and cons of Acute Care NP vs. Family or Emergency NP (which results in the same license). I still haven't come to a conclusion as to which one would best suit what I want to do, although I think that the ENP route would be the most versatile.
I will preface my statement...I know that NPs have historically been specialized in their training and on the other hand I know that some NPs on this board that have worked through these issues and have been able to function in multiple roles. My issue with the specialization of NPs, is the fact that there is no straight answer or absolute when it comes to where and what NPs can or can't do. It all DEPENDS.
At first, I was looking and strongly leaning towards doing the ACNP program. My interest is ER and Trauma and wouldn't mind working in an ER with the freedom to move towards more ICU type work. ACNP seemed like a perfect fit, BUT many of the ER jobs want a person to be able to see patients of all ages, which ACNP doesn't necessarily fit.
So, I looked into ENP programs that result in a FNP license. This is all fine and dandy but from reading different threads on this post, there are moves to prohibit FNPs from doing hospitalist type roles because they aren't trained as acute care providers.
The positives about NP training is that you can do it full or part time and in some instances via distance education. This is great for the working professionals among others (moms, etc etc) The flexibility is fantastic and I think it's a plus and a good avenue to bring more providers to the field.
Here is my beef. I have quite a few friends from college that are currently practicing PAs. One of my friends, in particular, has worked primary care moved to ER, then onto the floor doing Int. Medicine. They have the flexibility to move like this with no restrictions on practice and area of care.
So here's my question, why if I as an NP want to work in a primary care (all ages) setting with the ability to do rounds on my clinic's patients at the hospital, and assist my MD/DO with surgery if needed, have to get training as an FNP, ACNP, and get my RNFA.
I am not trying to fuel the NP vs. PA debate, but wouldn't it be easier for me to become a PA and have the flexibility to move as opposed to doing all of this training mentioned above?
I am posing this more as a hypothetical question for the purpose of sparking some PRODUCTIVE responses on how we can improve the marketability, etc of NPs.
Please fire away.....
Thanks for listening (or reading)
Jack