Published
I'm in the IPN Program as of Aug 1st for the very first time... I am a LPN and have graduated from RN school and need to take boards...Does anyone know while in the IPN Program, can I take boards and continue school for my ARNP?
Also, does Ultram show up in your urine? I broke my ribs and I'm on Ultram PRN...And, if I continue to take it..my doctor has to fill out that medication eval worksheet..What is someones opinion? Basically, I'm taking Ultram and want to know will IPN dismiss me?
Also, my contract is 5 years long. If you have NO issues after about a year, does anyone know if it will be cut short.
Let me know. Thanks! gatornurse06ipn
Mmmm this article is unclear about the point it is trying to get across. Is it saying that programs need to be monitored from the outside? Is it saying addicts should not run programs for addicts? Is it saying that anyone who diverts should not be licensed?
It is very fear based, that's for sure. It comes across as fanatical and zealous. I was waiting for it to say "think of the children!".
If our boards truly followed the physician model then every state would have an alternative to discipline program. We haven't even caught up with them yet.
If our boards truly followed the physician model then every state would have an alternative to discipline program. We haven't even caught up with them yet.
I think all but 10 states have nurse monitoring programs and there are a handful of states that do not have MD monitoring programs. Including CA.
Fyi I guess..
I disagree with TwoYearNurse. I just looked at the blog that zzzz50 referenced and it is one blogpost of many. Perhaps TwoYearNurse did not bother to look any further than the one blogpost but it has links to others and it is very well referenced. It appears to me what the author is getting at in this post is that physician monitoring programs have no meaningful oversight, regulation or transparency. What's wrong with that? He also notes that these programs were presented as an "alternative to discipline" and that this represents a "false-dichotomy" as "abuse can be hidden under a veil of benevolence." He also discusses at length the junk-science tests these physician programs introduced without FDA approval and gives a very credible argument that this "institutional injustice" is related to the marked rise in physician suicide. I don't see anything "fear based" in any of this. Programs should be run by qualified experts and being an addict or alcoholic "in recovery" does not make an expert. It can help in certain cases but can also harm. I also don't see where he is saying that anyone who "diverts" should not be licensed. My take is that he is saying that some of the people who are actually running these programs (such as the one running the PRN in Florida) should not be licensed due to behavior that most people would not commit even under the influence. I agree. I think most people would. I think this should instill fear--it is those bearing gifts and saying nothing is wrong that are the danger here.
IPN PRN all these monitoring agencies in all states are corrupt. How many nurses on this forum have gotten screwed. There is NO ONE to appeal. When IPN makes a mistake and believe me THEY DO. who receives the fallout? YES there should be oversite. They can decide anything they want. They can mandate that ice pick lobotomy is the new" treatment" requirement. That is NOT that far out. They performed the procedure in the office in 1967!!!. it takes numbers people to stop this. Call or write the state auditor. Complain about IPN abuse of power and conflict of interests. There needs to be an investigation. It has to stop.
wonderingipnnurse
10 Posts
Thank you so much for your advise!! I'm sorry to hear what you have gone through:( But, I believe when you hare DOWN TO NOTHING, GOD IS UP TO SOMETHING:))