Has Feminism Abandoned Nurses?

Nurses Activism

Published

Waitresses, sex workers, mothers, child care workers....all are included in the welcoming arms of a feminist ethos that values the work of women in society. Women in historically male occupations such as lawyers, physicians, business managers, and such are allowed entry, too.

But not nurses. Why?

Misogynistic stereotypes of dumb nurse-sexpots abound in Halloween costumes , television , and even in

. It's pretty plain that the profession takes its hits for being female-dominated, intimate, and, in many ways, downright unpleasant . The work of nurses is the traditional work of women: personal, caring, and intellectual simultaneously, without a great deal of prestige or recognition. Nursing embodies precisely the sort of roles that should fire up feminists' advocacy engines.

Yet feminist media do not feature articles about support and empowerment of nurses, the largest group of health care providers. A search of feministing.com, for one, revealed a smattering of articles, mostly about lay midwives (who are not nurses) and breastfeeding. My subscriptions to B*tch and Ms. do nothing to make me feel included in feminism as a professional. As an artist, a woman, a wife, a reader, a listener of music and a daughter - yes. But nothing about life as a nurse.

Nurses' workplace horrors rival those of the most mistreated workers anywhere. We face high rates of work-related injury, suboptimal staffing and mandatory overtime (in addition to the less-avoidable weekend, night and holiday shifts and exposure to hazardous body fluids and chemicals). If feminists supported the 2.6 million registered nurses in the United States, would it remain a dirty secret that 69 - 85% of nurses report having experienced sexual harrassment (mostly by physicians) on the job? (see Valente, 2004).

Nurses are, in many ways, the solution to health care reform. Why aren't feminist organizations telling the public that, for example, better funding for educating advanced practice nurses (APRN) to provide primary care would save health care dollars? APRN students in Seattle undertook a media campaign when the University of Washington increased their tuition to equal that of medical students, but feminist magazines and websites missed the story entirely. No matter that nurses pay our own way through graduate school because of lack of federal funding. No matter that medical residencies receive 375 federal dollars for every 1 dollar spent on nursing residencies (despite the much greater numbers of nurses needed in health care and the 27% rate of one-year turnover among new nursing graduates.)

Even the willingly ignorant cannot help but hearing of the critical nursing shortage . Much of the shortage is attributed to nursing faculty shortages caused by persistently low faculty salaries. A graduate education in nursing does not bring with it proportional increases in compensation. Most nurses remain educated in 2-year community college programs because there is a lack of drive for better-educated professional nurses, even though research shows better patient and organizational outcomes when nurses have more education. Nursing' recent emphasis on doctoral education for advanced practice nurses was met with opposition from the medical community, who apparently consider highly educated nurses a threat.

So, in nursing we have an underfunded, under-appreciated caring profession that gets little recognition and encounters active opposition to efforts to advance our status. Ninety-three percent of us are women. We place ourselves in both physical and psychological danger to nurse. We swim upstream to advance our educations. We work strange hours, skipping meals and breaks because employers do not staff adequately. We are customarily called by our first names, but we call our physician colleagues "doctor." Resistance in the hierarchical systems that exist in health care settings is met by firings, harrassment, and legal action for nurses.

What about this makes the nursing profession worth ignoring to feminists? Are feminists, too, buying into the stereotype of nurse as feckless doctor-servant? Is the whole nursing mess so hard to manage intellectually and emotionally that even the brave and smart are afraid to enter? Or are nurses viewed as so complicit in our own oppression that feminism can hardly be bothered?

Whichever, it's time feminists started paying attention.

Valente, S. M., Bullough, V. (2004). Sexual harassment of nurses in the workplace, Journal of Nursing Care Quality, 19(3), 234-241.

Specializes in Nursing Professional Development.

Hmmm ... Good topic for a new thread. I'll have to think about it a while.

Off the top of my head, I'd add this to the discussion. Nursing in general, has an anti-intelectual culture. A lot of the feminist literature and culture is perceived by some people as belonging to a more elitist, college-educated segment of society than that with which many nurses identify. As some would say, "I am too busy struggling to take care of my family and pay the bills to pay attention to a bunch of women who have enough free time to be active in the feminist movement."

Also ... nursing has not been heavily unionized, bringing the feminist perspective into the nursing culture through that avenue.

And also, historically, some of the feminists in nursing have been lesbian -- which has probably turned off a few nurses to who are uncomfortable or disapproving of homosexuality. Our society has come along way in recent years in accepting homosexuality ... and in accepting women in many occupations. But in previous generations, women without husbands to support them (unmarried for whatever reason) had few career choices. Nursing was one career a woman could pursue and rise to the top and be accepted by all segments of society. She could support herself and have no need for a husband. As some of those women have been active feminists, their sexuality may have contributed to a cultural divide between them and some other segments within nursing.

I hope I haven't offended anybody by adding these ideas to the discussion. I'm just trying to brainstorm some possible factors as to why the average nurse has not embraced feminism.

One of these days we will actually look at one and other as human beings and let the absurd concept of male versus female dominance die a horrible death. The only question is will it occur before or after our sun goes red giant?

Specializes in ICU, ED, PACU.

My question to you would be why should the issues listed by you be championed as a female plight and not a nursing plight? Do males in the profession not deal with these issues? Perhaps by looking at these issues as problems faced by the nursing profession rather than as problems faced by females in the nursing profession we could start on equal more constructive ground. I guess where you see injustice done to female nurses I just see injustice done to nurses.

Specializes in Peds/outpatient FP,derm,allergy/private duty.

My first thought is that I hope there are either enough feminists or representatives of feminist media who read this forum and can answer the question, or provide a rationale for the exclusion of the subject.

Second, I'm not sure if a correlation is being drawn between the amount of attention this issue is being given in feminist media and the changing of attitudes amongst the public at large. As Moogie alluded to, most of the young women I encounter entering the field simply don't think much about what the N.O.W., or Ms. magazine has to say, so that even if they gave more attention to the issue, it would be unlikely to affect the vast majority of nursing students today.

Most of the rank and file nurses I know don't seem to feel that their gender is the cause of oppression and long ago dropped the stereotype of feckless handmaiden, so the occasional Halloween costume or silly stereotype is basically "noise" and not a huge cause of offense. Thank God other types of stereotyping are falling by the wayside, too. A far more diverse group of men and women are entering the field than ever before. The brave and the smart are coming in droves, I can assure you. Which brings me to my last point/question.

I followed the link provided by the words "critical nursing shortage", a pbs.org feature from October 2008 that re-aired in October 2009. Do the nurses in academia know something we don't know? Okay, I get it that the huge baby boomer population is about to retire, we are sicker than ever, etc etc, but honestly those points are completely lost on the 499 new grad applicants that didn't get that 1 job opening, or new grads asking if they can work as a 1:1 babysitter so their kids can eat even as their loan defaults pile up? Sorry to sound upset, but it seems to me a lot more attention could be paid to the whys of the yesss. . . GLUT of new nurses reading and watching this stuff in total incredulity.

Again, sorry for emotion at end. Just read "how long is a new grad a new grad". Now there's some folks that really need some help.

Specializes in generalist.

Feminism has not abandoned nursing; you cannot abandon what you never embraced.

I decided to become a nurse in the 1970's at the height of the feminist movement. I had always wanted to be a physician or clinical psychologist, but when I got a job at a psychiatric hospital, I saw that the nurses were the most important part of the therapeutic milieu.

Nurses were responsible for keeping the psychiatrists, psychologists, and clinical social workers up to date about the patients' conditions and behavior. Nurses spent their work day in the therapeutic milieu while therapists came by to visit with patients one at a time and even then only for brief periods. They rarely ran groups and commonly spent more time checking with the nursing staff about the patients than they did with the patients themselves.

I was a supporter of feminism at the time; I was convinced that nursing was about to take off as a profession, and so I changed my career plans and chose nursing. That was a big mistake.

As we all know, feminism has opened many doors for women. Women are now well represented in medicine, law, business, politics, you name it. However, traditional women's professions (e.g. teaching and nursing) still lag behind traditional men's work in prestige and pay. Feminists do not seem to be concerned about this; but are they really feminists if they fail to value traditional women's work as highly as they value work that has traditionally been dominated by men? I think not.

I am retired now. I loved nursing my patients. I did not care for the second class citizen status that I endured throughout my career.

I would support a new feminism, one that is comprised of women who work in women's professions and fight for equal pay and status for those professions. The old feminism abandoned the women who deserved and needed them most.

Specializes in Nursing Professional Development.
My question to you would be why should the issues listed by you be championed as a female plight and not a nursing plight? Do males in the profession not deal with these issues? Perhaps by looking at these issues as problems faced by the nursing profession rather than as problems faced by females in the nursing profession we could start on equal more constructive ground. I guess where you see injustice done to female nurses I just see injustice done to nurses.

The reason for the emphasis on "female-ness" is that in the past century, nursing has been an overwhelmingly female profession. The development of the nursing role, the politics of power in the workplace, pay rates, etc. have all occurred in the context of a society in which the vast majority of physicians, hospital administrators, insurance executives, and other "players" in the health care world have been male -- and the nurses have been overwhelmingly female. Gender politics have shaped both the nursing profession and the healthcare system in which we practice.

In other words, you can't look at "issues of the nursing profession" in any thorough way without including their roots in gender politics. If we ignore that aspect of things, we fail to see the whole picture.

As more men enter nursing ... and more women become leaders in the other health care fields ... some of that gender bias may fade. But it will always be there in our roots and be part of our foundation. It would be simply incorrect to omit those facts from considerations of the profession today and for the future. It would be like saying, "We don't have slavery anymore: so we don't have to include race in any discussions of contemporary social issues anymore." We can pretend that things like race, or religion, or gender don't have any importance anymore ... but the truth is, they do. Not seeing the relevance of those concepts is in fact, a form of bias that is considered quite dangerous in that it prevents reasonable people from seeing the underlying dynamics of social relations and how social conventions and beliefs have been formed.

I agree that we should not ALWAYS look through a feminist lens. We should look at an issue from as many different perspectives as possible. But we must always consider the roots of the issues we think important -- and for that, we must include the concept of gender as a component if we want to get the facts right.

Specializes in ICU, trauma, gerontology, wounds.
Waitresses, sex workers, mothers, child care workers = female dominated but generally taken advantage of or under paid/under appreciated. (feminist take on their cause because they're OBVIOUS equity issues)

lawyers, physicians, business managers = male dominated. (feminist take on their cause because women are OBVIOUSLY under represented (equity issue) in those areas)

nursing, it's a female dominated career where there isn't an OBVIOUS equity issue (fairness). the pay is above avg, the working conditions are above avg, there are commericials about how great nurses are, job security and opportunities are above avg, etc.

whoopdedoo, many nurses fill under appreciated, but so do most people (that includes men) in all the other jobs out there that don't have the advantages nursing does.

I do not agree about working conditions for nursing being above average. Think of the rates of back injury, the emotinal burnout, the missed meals, the hours on our feet, the sense of failure as we leave work for the day because we could have done more had there been enough staff, and the mistreatment of nurses at the hands of physicians who are not reprimanded for verbal and sexual harassment. Then the more subtle oppression: lack of input into clinical and administrative decisions, "orders" to do things that are not good for our patients, etc.

I do agree that nurses have opportunities and pay and job security - under normal circumstances. But there are problems. Cyclical shortages due to lack of funding for nursing education and lack of concern for retention of the more experienced RNs. Then a recession occurs and nurses are laid off, new grads can't find jobs, and even experienced nurses struggle to find employment. I call that job insecurity.

Specializes in ICU, trauma, gerontology, wounds.
:( :( Well, except maybe on Dirty Jobs or Undercover Boss lol - but thats a tv show ;)

Every time "Dirty Jobs" comes on tv, I say aloud, "Why don't you try being a nurse? No job is dirtier."

Have you ever noticed that all the jobs shown are men's jobs? Where are the women who clean public restrooms? How about child care workers who deal in snot? Women's dirt is REALLY dirty - men's dirt is oil and soil and grime, which doesn't conjure up the same "yuck factor." And isn't actually dangerous to the worker.

Specializes in ICU, trauma, gerontology, wounds.
My first thought is that I hope there are either enough feminists or representatives of feminist media who read this forum and can answer the question, or provide a rationale for the exclusion of the subject.

Second, I'm not sure if a correlation is being drawn between the amount of attention this issue is being given in feminist media and the changing of attitudes amongst the public at large. As Moogie alluded to, most of the young women I encounter entering the field simply don't think much about what the N.O.W., or Ms. magazine has to say, so that even if they gave more attention to the issue, it would be unlikely to affect the vast majority of nursing students today.

Most of the rank and file nurses I know don't seem to feel that their gender is the cause of oppression and long ago dropped the stereotype of feckless handmaiden, so the occasional Halloween costume or silly stereotype is basically "noise" and not a huge cause of offense. Thank God other types of stereotyping are falling by the wayside, too. A far more diverse group of men and women are entering the field than ever before. The brave and the smart are coming in droves, I can assure you. Which brings me to my last point/question.

I followed the link provided by the words "critical nursing shortage", a pbs.org feature from October 2008 that re-aired in October 2009. Do the nurses in academia know something we don't know? Okay, I get it that the huge baby boomer population is about to retire, we are sicker than ever, etc etc, but honestly those points are completely lost on the 499 new grad applicants that didn't get that 1 job opening, or new grads asking if they can work as a 1:1 babysitter so their kids can eat even as their loan defaults pile up? Sorry to sound upset, but it seems to me a lot more attention could be paid to the whys of the yesss. . . GLUT of new nurses reading and watching this stuff in total incredulity.

Again, sorry for emotion at end. Just read "how long is a new grad a new grad". Now there's some folks that really need some help.

I don't believe the current hiring freeze means there is no need for more nurses. In fact, I think your point is important as we discuss nursing as an autonomous profession, instead of one subject to the whims of administrators who do not have our interests at heart. The current lack of jobs is due to hiring freezes put in place due to the recession by health care administrators. If our profession controlled its own fate, we would be independent contractors, like many physicians, who are seen as sources of income, not cost centers. Make no mistake, nurses are sources of income, although you'd be hard-pressed to get the American Hospital Association to admit it. In the ideal world, a stable and robust nursing workforce would be seen by employers as essential to the bottom line. But because nursing, way back when, decided to be employees, not private practitioners, we are stuck with a model that treats us as "expendable and expensive."

Specializes in Trauma ICU, Peds ICU.
May I ask: when you were in nursing school or during your practice, have you encountered any forms of sexism by female nurses? I have heard of a professor who said she didn't appreciate having men in nursing because they "get all the good jobs". I've also heard of professors being biased against male students (which is wrong.) Sexism is sexism and it's wrong, whether it's aimed toward females or males. Thanks in advance for your comments.

I had a couple (two) professors in nursing school who were pretty open about their disdain for male students. But as a practicing nurse, I'd have to agree with dude that being male is more often an asset than a problem. I'm not especially bothered by people mistakenly thinking I'm gay, or a failed medical student, or anything else like that.

I do not agree about working conditions for nursing being above average. Think of the rates of back injury, the emotinal burnout, the missed meals, the hours on our feet, the sense of failure as we leave work for the day because we could have done more had there been enough staff, and the mistreatment of nurses at the hands of physicians who are not reprimanded for verbal and sexual harassment. Then the more subtle oppression: lack of input into clinical and administrative decisions, "orders" to do things that are not good for our patients, etc.

I do agree that nurses have opportunities and pay and job security - under normal circumstances. But there are problems. Cyclical shortages due to lack of funding for nursing education and lack of concern for retention of the more experienced RNs. Then a recession occurs and nurses are laid off, new grads can't find jobs, and even experienced nurses struggle to find employment. I call that job insecurity.

Even granting you the points you wrote about, working conditions and compensation for nursing are wayyy above average. Have you worked in any other field before you became a nurse?

Like another male poster on this thread, while I do appreciate the historical context that nursing has been female dominated for the last 100 years and change, I see these present day issues as nursing issues, not female nurse issues, and I think most men in nursing would like a seat at the table in any discussion focused on righting these wrongs. Don't count us out.

Specializes in Critical Care.
Every time "Dirty Jobs" comes on tv, I say aloud, "Why don't you try being a nurse? No job is dirtier."

Have you ever noticed that all the jobs shown are men's jobs? Where are the women who clean public restrooms? How about child care workers who deal in snot? Women's dirt is REALLY dirty - men's dirt is oil and soil and grime, which doesn't conjure up the same "yuck factor." And isn't actually dangerous to the worker.

I only cited those shows, because I was admitting that sometimes society does acknowledge "lower-level" jobs. I'm not debating that nursing is gross/dirty at times and that those shows don't have enough women on them. And while "men's dirt" may not be as dangerous as "women's dirt" men's jobs are often very dangerous in different ways (mining, logging, oil drilling, longshoring, etc.). That being said, nursing is dangerous, esp. from a pathological standpoint. I still worry about getting HIV from a needle stick etc.

Actually, working with oil and many other hydrocarbons is dangerous. Many of these substances are inherently hazardous and carcinogenic.

+ Add a Comment