Currently, I have a BSN from a top school (no, it is not upenn) and worked for a year and a half on a general medicine med surg floor. I am at the age of 25, turning 26 this year. I was thinking about getting my MPH at UNC first (already applied to that school) due to tuition reimbursement (going to school for free basically) and then debating whether I should go and become an NP first or go straight to the PhD. I have always loved research and originally wanted to go straight into research after working for a few years as an RN. My interest is underserved populations and how we can better improve primary care for them, etc. etc. I use to dread the NP role because I was so set on research.
Lately, I have been interested in the NP role as I would also like to serve those in rural areas, provide health education and primary prevention as well as provide them with care. I particularly interested in working with underserved populations, those who are homeless, etc. I think that being an FNP would allow me to achieve those goals.
However, I am more of a population focused person. I'm not a super one on one person and I discovered that as a bedside nurse.
Things about me: I am single and no kids. If i get married and have kids, I might be prioritizing my kids and my household. If I do a PhD and get married, I might consider being a stay home mom so that I can be with my children and help them grow etc.
May I ask for opinions on whether I should go do my NP first and then go back for a PhD if I decide to or should I just go straight to PhD. There is also the option of doing a PhD and then later, if I decide to- go for an FNP.
Featured Replies
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later.
If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Currently, I have a BSN from a top school (no, it is not upenn) and worked for a year and a half on a general medicine med surg floor. I am at the age of 25, turning 26 this year. I was thinking about getting my MPH at UNC first (already applied to that school) due to tuition reimbursement (going to school for free basically) and then debating whether I should go and become an NP first or go straight to the PhD. I have always loved research and originally wanted to go straight into research after working for a few years as an RN. My interest is underserved populations and how we can better improve primary care for them, etc. etc. I use to dread the NP role because I was so set on research.
Lately, I have been interested in the NP role as I would also like to serve those in rural areas, provide health education and primary prevention as well as provide them with care. I particularly interested in working with underserved populations, those who are homeless, etc. I think that being an FNP would allow me to achieve those goals.
However, I am more of a population focused person. I'm not a super one on one person and I discovered that as a bedside nurse.
Things about me: I am single and no kids. If i get married and have kids, I might be prioritizing my kids and my household. If I do a PhD and get married, I might consider being a stay home mom so that I can be with my children and help them grow etc.
May I ask for opinions on whether I should go do my NP first and then go back for a PhD if I decide to or should I just go straight to PhD. There is also the option of doing a PhD and then later, if I decide to- go for an FNP.