CNA's Union-Busting in Ohio-An Open Letter

Nurses Union

Published

this week, nearly 8,000 nurses and other healthcare workers in ohio saw their dreams of forming a union derailed after the california nurses association (cna) flooded the state with hostile organizers and bombarded workers with wildly false and misleading leaflets and phone calls urging them to vote against the union.

for three years the workers joined with service employees international union (seiu) members, leaders and staff to form their union. they sent letters to catholic healthcare partners (chp) officials, mobilized community support, campaigned for fair organizing rules, and signed petitions saying they wanted to unite in seiu. the effort resulted in ground rules agreed to by both the workers and chp that were designed to put the interests of workers first—not the union or employer. they called for quick elections without delays, equal access to information from both sides, and guidelines to ensure honest discourse.

because of the union-busting onslaught by cna, the ethical, fair and democratic elections scheduled for today and friday at nine (chp) hospitals in ohio have been suspended.

the following is an open letter from those os us nurses who were denied the chance to unite this week for better jobs and healthcare to rose ann demoro, executive director of the california nurses association:

march 12, 2008

dear rose ann demoro,

it’s hard for us to imagine how someone who calls herself a labor leader could purposely do what you have done to us and our families. you don’t know any of us. you have never been to our homes or met our children. you have never visited us on our shifts, or walked in our shoes. you don’t know a thing a bout the struggle that brought us to the verge of our dream to have a union. and yet without talking to a single one of us you send your bullying staff to come in and spread terrible lies for no other reason than to destroy what we worked so hard to build.

for three years we have worked with seiu members, leaders and staff to form our union. we sent letters to hospital officials and mobilized community support for fair organizing rules. seiu has supported and encouraged us through some very hard times, and helped us stand up for ourselves. we are caregivers—registered nurses and respiratory therapists, dietary and housekeeping staff, lab techs and other employees. seiu helped us understand how we could do more by speaking with one voice and standing together for our families and our patients. seiu respected our intelligence and our ability to make our own decisions.

you say you stand for democracy. but then you come in with a goal of destroying our campaign without ever asking us what we think about seiu and our agreement for fair election ground rules—ground rules we now understand you have made use of many times in california.

you say you stand for justice. but then you deny us our opportunity for a fair vote free of misleading propaganda and scare tactics.

our efforts to unite for better jobs and health care were not a secret. at any time during those three years you could have come and presented your union, compared yourself to seiu, and asked us to make a choice. but you didn’t. so it is obvious to us that your sole intention was to destroy what we have built. what kind of organization sets out to destroy the efforts of the very people you claim to stand for, and then tries to pretend it’s a moral cause?

here in ohio, union organizers and representatives don’t behave the way yours do. they show respect for hard-working people. we have read all the words about how you try to justify this, but when compared to the needs of our families and the needs of our patients, they show a complete disregard for basic fairness and decency. you have brought harm to thousands of workers and families in ohio, and you should be ashamed of what you have done.

signed,

linda kirby, rn

mercy anderson

anderson township, oh

sue koch

er tech

mercy western hills

cincinnati, oh

barbara matlie, rn

mercy western hills

cincinnati, oh

michaela silver, rcp

springfield regional medical center

springfield, oh

diana stamler, rn

mercy fairfield

fairfield, oh

sally baker, rn

springfield regional medical center

springfield, oh

mary ann wolf,

lead cook

mercy anderson

anderson township, oh

peggy vaughn, rn

mercy western hills

cincinnati, oh

sue allen, rn

springfield regional medical center

springfield, oh

lorie compton, rcp

mercy memorial hospital

urbana, oh

colleen gresham, rn

mercy mt. airy

cincinnati, oh

betty white, mlt

mercy fairfield

fairfield, oh

susan home, rn

mercy mt. airy

cincinnati, oh

alecia davis, rn

springfield regional medical center

springfield, oh

marianne heider, rn

mercy western hills

cincinnati, oh

No and I never claimed to be. The origional post by RN Power Ohio seems ti infer that the author was part of the RN's employed by the hsopitals in question.

Sorry for the misunderstanding. I didn't get that impression on reading the letter.

Specializes in Med/Surg/Tele, Hem/Onc, BMT.

"An article written by a nurse and long time activist. "

From my post. I do not see how this infers that the nurse was working at a CHP hosptial.

i think we should check the facts before accepting the claim that seiu is a weak company union. one of the local papers in ohio ran an editorial yesterday about cna's busting up of these elections, and they dismiss this claim outright saying seiu's behavior in springfield shows it to be "distinctly unpoodle-like." check it out on this site:

[color=#003399]http://www.springfieldnewssun.com/o/content/oh/story/opinions/editorial/2008/03/13/sns031308editunion_r.html

i keep looking online for evidence that cna would be a stronger union for these nurses in ohio, and i must confess seiu looks infinitely better for ohio nurses than cna. as far as i can tell, cna doesn't represent any union rns in ohio or nurses who work for this company. with no members under contract, how can they have the political power to deliver on their promises of ratios? with no members in these markets or in this company, how can they negotiate superior contracts?

also, this whole argument that cna is stronger relies on the premise that these nurses were making a choice between cna. there choice was seiu or no union, despite what i understand cna to have said that "no=cna." they have no union at all right now, so cna's supposed strength has left these nurses in a much weaker position than if they would have voted yes to be seiu.

SEIU has not done a thing for health care workers in WI, they got a really bad reputation in this state. Maybe they need to prove that they are there for the worker,then they can regain some of their status as a union for the worker.

http://theunionnews.blogspot.com/2008/03/seiu-shocked-by-decert-epidemic.html

3/9/08

SEIU shocked by decert epidemic

laborstate.pngseiu.pngLeaders of a movement that has tentatively ousted the Service Employees International Union from a nursing home downtown say the union was unresponsive and unavailable too often. "[sEIU] didn't do anything for us except collect union dues," said Mary Foor, cook supervisor at the Altoona (PA) Center for Nursing Care.

Foor and others presented owner Grane Healthcare with a petition signed by 70 of the 120 bargaining-unit workers, renouncing SEIU representation at the expiration of its contract, they said. The company immediately withdrew its recognition of the union, which has appealed to the National Labor Relations Board in hopes an investigation will show the petition doesn’t represent a majority.

It was hard for workers to get an answer on almost any question they asked the union, including what it was doing with money from fundraisers, cook supervisor Debbie Hartman, housekeeper Woody Patterson and Foor said.

"No one ever gets back to anybody," Patterson said.

"An article written by a nurse and long time activist. "

From my post. I do not see how this infers that the nurse was working at a CHP hosptial.

Pardon me but the title

WHAT REALLY HAPPENED IN OHIO REGARDING CATHOLIC HEALTH PARTNERS, SEIU, AND NATIONAL NURSES ORGANIZING COMMITTEE/CALIFORNIA NURSES ORGANIZATION

by a Registered Nurse Who Was There

gives that impression. And why not include that the author's job is as a major NNOC organizer in Ohio. I think that bit of info is very important.

My interest is in learning the facts of the situation, not in hearing more propaganda from one side or the other. Unfortunately I have yet to see a factual, unbiased report on the situation. I will continue to search though.

Specializes in community health.

"So-called neutrality agreements occur under the provisions of the National Labor Relations Act. The CNA has had many elections under the same provisions for neutrality.

Neutrality agreements are not the issue..yes NNOC/CNA has won neutriality agreements and subsequent elcetions but the BIG DIFFERENCE was that the agreeement included a requirement that 30% of the the RNs being organized had to sign authorization cards stating they wanted NNOC/CNA represenation before filing for an election and before having the rights to go inside and speak with the nurses.

...and in most cases an NNOC/CNA didn't file forthe election un til over 50% signed.

How many RN signed cards in Ohio? an d why wasn't that a require,ent before going fdorward with an election? It's called democracy.

Specializes in Oncology.

Give me a break! If SEIU had been organizing in Ohio for 3 years, how could CNA/NNOC derail the process in a week's time? This is proof that there was no support from RNs in those facilities. SEIU and teh hospitals were banking on the fact that teh election would be over before most RNs even got word that it was hgappening.

From where I sit this is simple. SEIU cut a deal with an employer (What they do best!). They whispered sweet promises into the ears of executives...."we promise not to strike, we'll keep your "girls" in line, we'll keep real unions out, we won't fight back if you want to restructure or down-size, we won't let RNs speak out about unsafe conditions..."

Think about it: what kind of anti-RN, anti-patient promises would you have to make for a hospital to be railroading RNs INTO a union?! The employer filed the election petition!

RNrecoveringfromSEIU wrote:

"Think about it: what kind of anti-RN, anti-patient promises would you have to make for a hospital to be railroading RNs INTO a union?! The employer filed the election petition!"

And there's the real key point: When CNA organizes a hospital, the bosses fight tooth and nail against it, because they know it means an effective union with a core focus on patient advocacy and RN power. My hospital was organized in 2000 and our employer spent over 2 million on the fight against it. When an employer is happy to have a union, you can bet that a pretty dirty deal has been cut. When CNA/NNOC wins an organizing agreement, it is usually because we've developed enough bargaining power within a chain to force it. And as mentioned above, it still requires us to win the support of a substantial number of nurses.

SEIU has a habit of making these kinds of deals: They've made deals that promised no strikes, deals that promised no grievances, deals that promised to support the employer's legislative agenda, etc. Andy Stern seems bent on becoming the Bosses' favorite "union leader".

When I was a member of SEIU/1199W in Wisconsin, I was asked to help organize RNs in non-union hospitals. I was apalled at the attitude of the SEIU staff.

In the "organizing training" I was told never to use the words "power, struggle, union, fight, or employer" when talking to my felow RNs. Instead we should say, "voice, dialogue, partnership, place at the table, and hospital administration". We were told that you can't make the hospitals focus on patient care, so the best you could hope for was a partnership or "place at the table". What an underestimation of RN power!

Rather than have a real conversation with RNs about solidarity, advocacy and collective power, we were supposed to "dumb it down" so RNs wouldn't "get scared away".

Well SEIU, it was your parternalistic attitude, and dismissal of RNs as a "women's profession" that "scared me away" from SEIU!

Hello! RNs are the heart of health care. Hospitals can't exist without RNs. We're the last line of defense for our patients. When our hospitals endanger patients, we have the obligation to collectively advocate for our patients. Partnering with hospital chains as they hurt our patients is not an option.

There's something to be said for a union that represents only RNs. It seems like NNOC speaks to my experience. If there was a CNA/NNOC hospital in WI, I'd take a job there in a second!

Jan from WI, Thankyou!! I also had a similar experience with the SEIU 1199 in WI.I found the organizers lazy and unmotivated.

http://209.85.165.104/search?q=cache:CK34dR1vMJ0J:www.infoshop.org/inews/article.php%3Fstory%3D20060703002725189+seiu+1199+worthless&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=3&gl=us

When The Union Is The Boss

Monday, July 03 2006 @ 12:27 AM PDT

Contributed by: Rangzen

Views: 1,970 Late in the summer of 2005, as I geared up for my post-college graduation job search, a group of labor unions broke away from the AFL-CIO to form the Change to Win Federation. While media commentary generally portrayed the split as detrimental to working-class interests -- as if commentators actually cared about such matters -- I instead saw flashes of hope and a renewed commitment to reinvigorating a fading labor movement.

When the Union Is the Boss

by Kevin Funk, MR Zine

I. Meeting North America's "Fastest-Growing Union"

Late in the summer of 2005, as I geared up for my post-college graduation job search, a group of labor unions broke away from the AFL-CIO to form the Change to Win Federation. While media commentary generally portrayed the split as detrimental to working-class interests -- as if commentators actually cared about such matters -- I instead saw flashes of hope and a renewed commitment to reinvigorating a fading labor movement.

Wanting my place on the ground floor of this struggle, I applied for a job as a union organizer with Service Employees International Union (SEIU), a founding member of the Federation and a union with a reputation for leading the charge to organize low-wage workers. Idealism in hand, I happily accepted an offer from District 1199WV/KY/OH, whose expansive region covers the states of Ohio and West Virginia, as well as parts of Kentucky.

On my first day of work, a typically crisp fall day in September, I entered an SEIU District that triumphantly wore a badge of success. Covering mostly low-wage health care workers, 1199 professes to have one of the fastest growth rates of union membership within SEIU, which itself claims the title of the country's "fastest-growing union." [*1]

Fellow organizers and higher-ups within the union alike, displaying a striking unity of message that would later give me pause, frequently bandied about the idea that it was the most hardcore SEIU District; "while organizers at other locals around the country have off every weekend," an organizer or leader would commonly say, "WE only have off every other weekend."

And if the spirit of hard work and devotion was present in union employee attitudes, it also manifested itself in the battles that 1199 was choosing to fight. With grand hopes of becoming a powerhouse in Ohio state politics and rapidly approaching November elections, 1199 was employing several dozen organizers statewide to work in support of mayoral candidates in Cincinnati, Toledo, and Youngstown, and was also the major player behind a ballot initiative in Springfield.

It was this ballot initiative that most dominated 1199's agenda. Faced with the dilemma of how to grow exponentially as a union at a time when most organizing was being done by conducting long, slow, and expensive piecemeal, hospital-by-hospital campaigns, 1199 set its sights on what it saw as the bigger picture, and one with a potential payout to be won in a few fell swoops: passing ballot initiatives to establish "Hospital Accountability Commissions" in cities throughout Ohio in order to prohibit the state's largest health system, Catholic Healthcare Partners, from interfering in future statewide organizing efforts.

District 1199 was, indeed, talking the progressive talk -- not only in its expressed desire to unionize systemically-underpaid healthcare employees throughout Ohio, but also in its aim to establish a regulatory mechanism for a hospital system that receives sizable taxpayer subsidies and nevertheless mercilessly sues countless patients who are unable to pay for overpriced services.

On the surface, then, 1199 was striking the pose of a forward-thinking, progressive-to-the-bone organization, one firmly entrenched on the front line of a battle for working-class survival against modern-day robber barons.

Yet while this initial impression retains kernels of truth, I also began to discover a different union reality from inside, one characterized by an often subtle yet convoluted net of deceit, fear-mongering, incompetence, and, in fact, union-busting.

II. Deceiving the Public for Its Own Good

Perhaps my first encounter with 1199's seedy underbelly occurred when former Vice Presidential candidate John Edwards was to speak in Springfield to rally "Yes" votes for the then-upcoming referendum on the SEIU-backed Hospital Accountability Commission.

Officials in 1199 hoped for (and later claimed to have attracted) a crowd of 1,000 for the event, seeing the presence of a major politician in a minor market during a non-presidential election year as a means to create a stir in the normally sleepy Rust Belt city of 65,000.

As I soon found out, however, there was a disquieting number of outsiders doing the stirring.

In the course of my duties in guiding attendees from a downtown parking lot to the nearby rally site, I watched as bus after out-of-town SEIU bus poured its riders into the lot adjacent to a Springfield library for their attendance at the rally. The end result of this transfer was that perhaps half of the crowd consisted of either 1199 employees like me -- almost all drawn from a college campus instead of the rank-n-file -- or representatives from workplaces organized under 1199, who were bussed into Springfield from a meeting in nearby Columbus. Thus, what 1199 leadership spun as a strong display of organic community support masked the fact that half of those in attendance were not even from Springfield.

To attempt to conceal this from the press -- a ballsy move given the lengthy row of out-of-town busses parked conspicuously only a few blocks from the rally location -- 1199 higher-ups instructed staffers and representatives to simply ignore the media or to say that we were indeed from Springfield, when in fact some had never even set foot there prior to that afternoon.

Yet this was merely one -- and amongst the more benign -- of the instances in which 1199, under the auspices of the Springfield Fair Care Coalition, either deceived or concealed motives from the same people whom the union was supposedly seeking to help [*2] -- the net result of which created a significant, and fatal, backlash.

The Coalition, backed and dominated by SEIU, was selling the idea of a Hospital Accountability Commission to the people of Springfield primarily as a means to assure that Catholic Healthcare Partners, which operates both of the hospitals in Springfield, would be held responsible to community standards in light of the large tax breaks the company receives. Feeding on popular discontent with the hospitals' liberal policy of suing patient debtors, as well as a recent and controversial decision to merge the two hospitals into a downtown location, the Coalition sought to portray itself as an altruistic community group whose sole goal was to ensure that the hospitals did their job and served the needs of the people of Springfield, especially those of the poor and working class.

This was the message pumped into the city by advertising campaigns, billboards, mailings, and, most importantly, by 1199 organizers such as myself, who were in constant contact with any reachable resident of Springfield through repeated rounds of phone calls and house visits.

Yet in the course of spreading this message to the people of Springfield, union leadership directly ordered us to misrepresent our positions and refer to ourselves as "volunteers with the Springfield Fair Care Coalition." There was nothing "voluntary" about it -- it was both a mandatory part of the job and a task for which SEIU was compensating us as normal. Not "volunteering" for the Coalition would have earned me, or anyone else, a one-way ticket to the unemployment lines.

The obfuscation of SEIU's role in the campaign, however, extended far beyond how we introduced ourselves at people's front doors. Rarely in any facet of this communications deluge was the union mentioned, rarer still was the ultimate goal of the entire campaign: the unionization of hospital employees.

When it did become common knowledge that this was the goal of the Coalition, many Springfield residents rightfully felt deceived. As I heard several times during house visits, many people were not opposed to unionization per se (though some indeed were), but they were clearly incensed at being subjected to a campaign fed to them on slogans of "accountability," while the Coalition was obscuring from them its ultimate purpose. [*3]

On November 7, 2005, Springfield voters rejected the establishment of a Hospital Accountability Commission. [*4]

While extrapolating specific causal factors in this defeat is indeed a Herculean task, the eventual recognition by many Springfield residents of the fact that SEIU was pursuing a hidden agenda surely played a significant role, as did the oft-expressed perception that the constancy of SEIU mailings, house visits, and phone calls bordered on harassment.

Whether this loss can be attributed to mere tactical errors or 1199's sheer arrogance, the end result is the same: the people of Springfield are still suffering at the hands of an inhuman, corporate health care machine. Yet either cause for this botched opportunity begs for profound soul-searching amongst 1199 decision-makers.

III. Hierarchy Is Okay in the Name of Your Preferred Social Class

While the people of Springfield were preparing to vote on a matter whose core purpose the Springfield Fair Care Coalition was carefully shielding from the public eye, elements within 1199 were submitting its very own organizers, such as myself, to an even more sustained propaganda campaign.

Before being hired, I had wondered if 1199 staffers were organized in any form into their own union. After all, it struck me as the height of common sense that we, who were cashing paychecks supposedly in the service of empowering workers to have a greater voice in their own places of employment, would have the very same rights for ourselves.

I was wrong.

Not only was there a complete lack of representation for 1199 employees, but even broaching the idea in public was a ground for castigation from the leadership and stern glances of disapproval from the well-oiled de facto politburo, composed of organizers who were around long enough to become veterans by proving sufficiently loyal in toeing the "company line" in instances such as these.

One organizer, a recently-hired African-American male who at a staff meeting raised questions about 1199's lack of both a union and an outlet for diversity-related issues, was thereafter reassigned to Akron for a solo project. A more senior organizer unsympathetically described it as a "bad sign" for the relocated organizer to be forced into working alone so soon after being hired, a "bad sign" in this case being a euphemism for "a way to shut him up."

At the height of its display of arbitrary power, 1199 leadership called nearly all of us organizers, who were going door-to-door to speak to registered voters in Springfield, to an emergency meeting 45 minutes away at District headquarters in Columbus. Having been given no prior indication as to the content of the meeting, the other organizers and I arrived at the meeting, only to be subjected to a nearly hour-long tongue-lashing by the union leadership for a supposed lack of discipline in the midst of a major campaign season. Despite our 70-hour work weeks, as well as our having worked, at times. more than two weeks without a single day or weekend off, the union bosses castigated us for not being sufficiently focused on winning the upcoming round of elections.

One staffer commented in the course of the meeting that workers represented by the union were being paid poverty wages "to wipe people's asses for a living" -- the comment made to make any criticism of union policy seem like a whining of spoiled bourgeois children. If you are unwilling to submit entirely to 1199 dogma and march in lockstep with company dictates, you are not dedicated to the working class.

At the core of those dictates was the idea that 1199 employees should not be unionized, justified by the argument that their boss is not their class enemy like in a normal place of employment, but instead is technically the workers whose wages allow the union to function. Thus, union employees can make no claim to having distinct interests from leadership, as they are all united in a common front under the power of the workers. Therefore, the idea of a union for union employees was, in this view, at best a distraction from the real task of organizing workers, at worst a ploy by slacking, reactionary, and uncommitted organizers to find a way to work shorter hours for higher pay.

As it played itself out in real-life scenarios, this belief turned into the basis for a comical yet tragic informal system designed to extract unrelenting loyalty from the organizers.

One organizer, upon replying with a "boo" to management's decree that we would be losing an expected and rare weekend break, found himself pulled out of the group to be scolded by more senior organizers.

More systematically, senior organizers would broach the topic of having a union with newer employees, trying to both gain information as to the stance of the individuals in question, as well as to plant within them the idea that forming a union would be detrimental to the very same workers that the union was supposedly trying to help. Those deemed "trouble-makers," if not inspired to leave by the cultish tint of it all, were left to contend with a mind-numbing workweek and unsympathetic management.

It is excruciating enough, after all, to spend nearly all waking hours in a windowless basement making the same 30 second phone call over and over again to Springfield voters in the course of conducting surveys, even more so to have one's loyalty directly questioned at every turn by management and sycophantic co-workers alike. [*5]

It is in this way that the system perpetuates itself. Members of the unruly mob, unwilling to tolerate witch-hunts and being treated like schoolchildren, move to greener pastures; left behind is an ever-increasing sect of idealistic youth turned into automatons.

One might find it difficult to imagine how the workers represented by SEIU benefit from this arrangement.

IV. A Call for a Democratic Labor Movement

It is, indeed, a serious act of both hubris and hypocrisy to publicly espouse a commitment to "workers' power" while denying it to the union's very own employees. A simple application of principle, after all, would hold that the employees of a union should be represented within their own union. While its opponents in the SEIU power structure paint such an effort as a mere ploy by lazy, uncommitted employees interested in nothing more than fattening their pockets -- eerily similar to how bosses whom we supposedly oppose intimidate their employees -- it is instead an effort to gain desperately needed worker representation in decision-making, in matters financial and otherwise, and to ensure that workers have an avenue for the resolution of grievances.

Denying the universality of such a principle -- that workers deserve representation no matter for whom they work and indeed possess the competence to manage their own affairs -- not only defies any possible conception of common sense, but surely condemns the labor movement to be built on nothing but flimsy propaganda slogans to be tossed around for external purposes yet callously discarded for internal matters.

Yet the conservative nature of the labor hierarchy in general stands directly in the way of these democratic reforms. In the course of brief attempts by me and a few other organizers to explore the possibility of an outside union organizing 1199 employees, we were turned down by even the most "progressive" outfits, generally for the mere fear of "damaging relations" with SEIU at the national level.[*6] Any pretense of caring about principle was thus crudely cast aside so as not to upset camaraderie within the ranks of the labor oligarchy.

It is an oligarchy which has often been guilty of undermining the vitality (and, indeed, numerical strength) of organized labor as a whole, its conservatism in tactical considerations and unrepresentative structure a clear hindrance to true union democracy and sound decision-making.[*7] From frequent collaboration with management at the expense of workers in the United States, to support for anti-democratic forces in Latin America and the Caribbean through the Solidarity Center, labor movement leaders have done little to justify their usurpation of power from those to whom it rightfully belongs: the workers themselves.

The formation of a true "Change to Win" would require recognition of this fact and an obligatory dismantling of the structures that allow a select few to rule from above. Then, and only then, could a true labor movement thrive, free from reactionary, power-hungry, and anti-democratic leadership, free to be true community representatives and struggle for the rights of workers everywhere.

Specializes in Emergency room.

As an RN from OH, employed by CHP and an active member of SEIU, I have a unique perspective on the events of the past few days. I find the UNINVITED actions of the CNA and NNOC appalling and unprofessional. Their behavior has deprived not only 3,000 RN's of representation and a voice at the table, but they've also deprived 5,000 non-RN employees of the ability to have a voice in their own working conditions. I lived and worked through our own efforts to organize. CHP has been abjectly anti-union. While we were organizing, they spent thousands on 'union busters', pulled employees into mandatory meetings to use scare tactics to discourage organization and were found guilty of dozens of ULP's. Judging from these past behaviours, it's doubtful that CHP embraced an agreement with SEIU to allow democratic elections or 'hand-selected' SEIU as their union of choice. It's been my experience that CHP and SEIU have a very contentious relationship. SEIU has spent countless man-hours and resources investigating CHP practices and their 'non-profit' status. This agreement was the result of all that work.

I'm also a member of ONA--and, I've come to know that their allegiances do not lie with the rank and file RN's. Case in point--a pending bill before the Ohio Legislature which is a collusion between ONA and the Ohio Hospital Association. It's a weak bill that favors the hospitals--not patients or nurses.

I'm proud to be a member of SEIU. It's been my experience that they are a socially responsible organization that works to improve the working conditions of their members, thereby improving services provided to the communities served.

CNA and NNOC's actions are blatantly 'union-busting'. Since when is NO union better than ANY union?

+ Add a Comment