CMS reimbursement rules for AAs

Specialties CRNA

Published

[TABLE=width: 600]

[TR]

[TD=colspan: 1][TABLE=width: 100%]

[TR]

[TD=width: 100%, colspan: 1][TABLE=width: 100%]

[TR]

[TD=colspan: 1, align: center]

147.jpg

New Medicare Rules

June 2013

[/TD]

[/TR]

[/TABLE]

[TABLE=width: 100%]

[TR]

[TD=bgcolor: #FFCC66, colspan: 1][/TD]

[/TR]

[/TABLE]

[/TD]

[/TR]

[TR]

[TD=width: 100%, colspan: 1][TABLE=width: 100%]

[TR]

[TD=colspan: 1, align: left]Dear Colleague:

Knowing of your interest in ensuring patient access to safe, cost-effective anesthesia care, I am pleased to inform you that the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) has now clarified and confirmed that anesthesiologist assistants (AAs) may not bill Medicare for nonmedically directed (billing code QZ) anesthesia services as CRNAs are educated and authorized to do.

In a policy transmittal dated May 30, 2013, the agency clarified the distinctions between CRNAs, who may practice autonomously and bill Medicare for their services, and AAs, whose services are covered by Medicare when they are medically directed by an anesthesiologist. Transmittal 2716 amends Chapter 12 of the Medicare Claims Processing Manual governing Medicare Part B coverage of anesthesia care.

Though Medicare Administrative Contractors (MACs) long held that AAs may not bill Medicare QZ, the Palmetto GBA MAC serving the states of California, Hawaii, Nevada, North Carolina, South Carolina, Virginia and West Virginia published an email April 24 stating, "Palmetto GBA has received guidance that the QZ HCPCS modifier is also to be used for an Anesthesiologist Assistant (AA) service performed without medical direction." Noting that the Palmetto GBA action was inconsistent with Medicare regulations and payment manuals that say an AA is a "person who works under the direction of an anesthesiologist," AANA addressed the issue directly with Palmetto GBA and the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS).

The action taken by CMS represents an important development in anesthesia services coverage, clarifying what we already know: that CRNA and AA educational preparation and services are not the same, and that the Medicare program recognizes them differently. While Medicare recognizes CRNA services provided autonomously and with anesthesiologist medical direction, in contrast the agency only recognizes AA services under anesthesiologist medical direction. Many public and commercial health plans covering CRNA services follow Medicare's lead.

We commend the Medicare agency for having an open ear to AANA's concerns, following and appropriately clarifying the law, and promoting patient access to safe and cost-effective anesthesia care.

For all you do for the patients, practice and profession of nurse anesthesia, thank you.

Sincerely,

129.jpg

Janice J. Izlar, CRNA, DNAP

AANA President

[/TD]

[/TR]

[/TABLE]

[/TD]

[/TR]

[TR]

[TD=width: 100%, colspan: 1][/TD]

[/TR]

[TR]

[TD=width: 100%, colspan: 1][/TD]

[/TR]

[TR]

[TD=width: 100%, colspan: 1][/TD]

[/TR]

[TR]

[TD=colspan: 1, align: center][TABLE=width: 100%]

[TR]

[/TR]

[/TABLE]

[/TD]

[/TR]

[/TABLE]

[/TD]

[/TR]

[/TABLE]

If professionals cannot debate respectfully, they need to bypass the thread/forums.

Those coming on who are educated professionals in other disciplines (non-nursing) and come with an agenda to be divisive only, we don't need this.

This IS a nursing forum and we invite others from differing disciplines to cone in and discuss, but looks like the majority of the ones we've invited to partake in discussion, only want to be divisive, trollish, argumentative, naive, and disrespectful; adding nothing positive to the discussion about the CRNA. There are other forums these individuals can go to and will be more than welcome there.

So, from this point forward, if the debates cannot be respectful , then posts will be removed and points assigned.

I present a different opinion - that's not being trollish. Unfortunately, the MD / CRNA / AA debate will continue to rage on for the forseeable future. My viewpoint, and whether you agree with me or not I don't care, is one that comes from more than three decades in anesthesia practice, including time spent as a director in our national organization. I had a master's degree in anesthesia when virtually all CRNA's were getting certificates, many from OJT schools sponsored/owned by anesthesiologists in community hospitals to feed the needs of their own departments.

99% of the CRNA's on this board have never worked with an AA, and are only able to offer up their AANA-inspired talking points with regard to AA practice because they simply don't know any better. On the other hand, I along with virtually every AA has worked with CRNA's, so we know them far better than they know us. Half of the 125 anesthetists in my group are CRNA's. We hire quality anesthetists, regardless of the initials after their name, and regardless of whatever order they put those initials. (what a horribly important thread that is, BTW).

The lies and misinformation spread about AA's is not a new phenomenon. From "AA's are uneducated" which we heard in the 80's (hard for the certificate CRNA's to argue that point with us) to the "they aren't nurses first" arguments (wow - what a news flash - and neither are most physicians), and of course the ever-popular "they're tools for the ASA". So - I simply set the record straight when I see something I disagree with. I don't run to mommy when I don't like someone else's post. I have no interest in "promoting CRNA's" although the fact that I have hired several dozen in the last few years should indicate that I clearly think many of them are talented and competent professionals. If I had an anti-CRNA agenda, I wouldn't hire them in the first place. I have never sought to stop CRNA's from practicing, although I freely admit I think independent CRNA practice is not in the best interests of the patient. Many CRNA's however have sought and continue to prevent expansion of AA practice in those states where AA's aren't currently in practice. If they would just be honest about their motives, even if I disagreed with them, I'd have a lot more respect for them. It's got nothing to do with education - or experience - or competency - or a lack of any of those things. It's got everything to do with competition and the fact that they don't want any.

Specializes in Anesthesia, Pain, Emergency Medicine.

Can we please delete this argumentative and derogatory post and ban him?

Specializes in Education, FP, LNC, Forensics, ED, OB.

Closed for review.

+ Add a Comment