BSN minimum requirement

Nurses General Nursing

Published

It is my firm belief that the minimum requirement for nursing should be a BSN. We want to be accepted as a profession, yet we allow 2 year programs to dominate the field. Now I went to a 2 year program and will be finishing my BSN this semester. My school did a great job preparing me for "tasks" of nursing, but oh, it is so much more than that. Many other countries have moved or are moving towards 4yr degree minimums and the US needs to stay atop in this competative field. The nursing shortage will not always be here and it is to your advantage to get your degree now. The 2 yr programs will make a great footstep in the years to come, but the 4yr degree will become the RNs of the future. As nurses move into the 21st century we need to pull together to demonstrate our power as a profession, the only way to do this is to have strong, educated nurses in not just bedside tasks but critically thinking, politics, research and community health. Think about it, comments welcome.

Originally posted by Brownms46:

If you think the nursing shortage is going away...you must be totally out of touch with reality! I have been in nursing 22yrs, and when I started there was a nursing shortage. You want to know what has changed? It has become worse...not better! I also watched BSN come into the hospitals totally unprepared to function on the units, any units! And not only are they unable to function as well as 2yr RNs, they feel the basic nursing skills are beneath them! Give me a two or three yr. RN ANY day! I have watched these so-called "real" nurses ignore patient requests for bedpans, and really anything that might "dirty" those percious educationed hands of theirs! Yes two year RNs may dominate the field, but they are willing to do the work, and give the patients the care they desire! Give me a honest to goodness break...jeeze!

Gloria

Gloria,

I am in a BSN program. However, I realize that a great deal of experience will be needed before I can even come near some of the 2 year RN's and LVN's I have worked with during my clinicals and my time as a nurse tech. I really don't think that it is a matter of years in college that make a really great nurse, it is a matter of calling. One who is called to be a nurse will put patient care at the foremost. One who is called to be a nurse will not quibble over years in school, but will recognize true nursing in anyone who exhibits it. There will be no time wasted over jealousy and infighting. We fight too much. If the future is going towards the BSN degree, then those who do not have a BSN should be valued, and their positions protected, and their pay scale graduated according to their expertise and experience during the transition (which should be slow). I have no problem with a wonderful, experienced LVN (LPN) making a salary commiserate with her skill and experience, even if it is more than a BSN. I guess what I am trying to say is that the worth of a nurse isn't necessarily in the degree she attains. I am sorry you are feeling attacked.

Julie

Originally posted by Brownms46:

If you think the nursing shortage is going away...you must be totally out of touch with reality! I have been in nursing 22yrs, and when I started there was a nursing shortage. You want to know what has changed? It has become worse...not better! I also watched BSN come into the hospitals totally unprepared to function on the units, any units! And not only are they unable to function as well as 2yr RNs, they feel the basic nursing skills are beneath them! Give me a two or three yr. RN ANY day! I have watched these so-called "real" nurses ignore patient requests for bedpans, and really anything that might "dirty" those percious educationed hands of theirs! Yes two year RNs may dominate the field, but they are willing to do the work, and give the patients the care they desire! Give me a honest to goodness break...jeeze!

Gloria

Gloria,

I am in a BSN program. However, I realize that a great deal of experience will be needed before I can even come near some of the 2 year RN's and LVN's I have worked with during my clinicals and my time as a nurse tech. I really don't think that it is a matter of years in college that make a really great nurse, it is a matter of calling. One who is called to be a nurse will put patient care at the foremost. One who is called to be a nurse will not quibble over years in school, but will recognize true nursing in anyone who exhibits it. There will be no time wasted over jealousy and infighting. We fight too much. If the future is going towards the BSN degree, then those who do not have a BSN should be valued, and their positions protected, and their pay scale graduated according to their expertise and experience during the transition (which should be slow). I have no problem with a wonderful, experienced LVN (LPN) making a salary commiserate with her skill and experience, even if it is more than a BSN. I guess what I am trying to say is that the worth of a nurse isn't necessarily in the degree she attains. I am sorry you are feeling attacked.

Julie

This is the second bulletin board I have read tonight, and they seem to have similiar themes. The first was "Why does nursing eat its young?" By the replys that are posted here, the answer seems to be obvious. Everyone seems to interested in the number of hours I have spent in school (yes, I am an ADN student scheduled to graduate in May), and not in the extent or level of skills that my education has generated. The point that we all have to take the same boards is relevant, but that isn't all. We are encouraged to continue our educations when we finish this program, but to expand our educations, not necessarily to improve our clinical skills. In my state, we are required to have the same number of clinical hours logged as our four year degree counterparts, so I believe that the additional courses have to be in nursing theory, not bedside care.

When I started my nursing education, my goal was to take care of my patients to the best of my ability, and that is still my goal this close to graduation. If a four year degree will enable me to do that, then that education will come in the future. At the moment, I feel I can competently meet nursing standards, even if some have reservations about my degree level.

This is the second bulletin board I have read tonight, and they seem to have similiar themes. The first was "Why does nursing eat its young?" By the replys that are posted here, the answer seems to be obvious. Everyone seems to interested in the number of hours I have spent in school (yes, I am an ADN student scheduled to graduate in May), and not in the extent or level of skills that my education has generated. The point that we all have to take the same boards is relevant, but that isn't all. We are encouraged to continue our educations when we finish this program, but to expand our educations, not necessarily to improve our clinical skills. In my state, we are required to have the same number of clinical hours logged as our four year degree counterparts, so I believe that the additional courses have to be in nursing theory, not bedside care.

When I started my nursing education, my goal was to take care of my patients to the best of my ability, and that is still my goal this close to graduation. If a four year degree will enable me to do that, then that education will come in the future. At the moment, I feel I can competently meet nursing standards, even if some have reservations about my degree level.

WOW!

I can't believe the way people talk to strangers. If these people were standing in front of you would you use the same language?

And was I out the day they taught Potty Mouth 101?

I hope you all are more cool headed nurses than you are debaters.

WOW!

I can't believe the way people talk to strangers. If these people were standing in front of you would you use the same language?

And was I out the day they taught Potty Mouth 101?

I hope you all are more cool headed nurses than you are debaters.

Whew. Pretty lively discussion we got going here.

Here's the thing. As is quite obvious by the preceding discussion there is a split in the current nursing environment among the various levels of education. Therefore, it is fairly safe to say that by creating a standard level of education we would likely reduce (not totally eliminate) this diversive factor.

The question is what SHOULD be the minimum education level? Generally in the working world the higher the level of education for a job the greater respect it is given. Generally the greater degree of complexity and responsibilty of a job the higher the level of education required. Following this logic you could surmise that the BScN would likely be the ideal choice.

To clarify I am NOT saying that a BScN necessarily makes you a better nurse, initially prepares you better or worse, gives you super powers, etc. When I say higher degree of education I am talking academic perception only. Very few people would regard a college diploma as higher than a university degree.

I agree with sheripa's point that anyone can consider themselves a professional regardless of their level of education. However that does not mean others will share that view. I would consider a McDonald's employee who was polite, efficient and well mannered to act in a professional manner but I would not call them a professional. A slovenly attired, poorly spoken engineer would likely still be called a professional on the basis of their job and educational background. As well, if you go around calling yourself a "glorified butt wiper" don't expect many people to consider that professional....

On that note, I agree that total care is an important part of nursing in many areas. Definately not the main part though. Assessment, intervention and evaluation, the nursing process is the heart of nursing. Total care may be the task that takes up most of your day but that's all it is. A task. Many people could do that. Many people besides nurses do. However what they cannot do is provide the comprehensive assessment and evaluation throughout the total care process that nurses do. They cannot formulate interventions based on their assessment findings... well some probably could but not with the degree of certainty nurses should be able to.... When I am cleanig feces off a patient, that is not what I am focussed on. I am assessing the factors why they are incontinent (probably obvious but not always), their skin condition, problem solving if they is any way to avoid incontince, etc. That is how I differ from others who could do that job. I bring my pracitcal experience and education with me through all my daily tasks. Nurses can do many things and do them all well. That is both our strength and our curse in my opinion.

Cheers,

J-P

Whew. Pretty lively discussion we got going here.

Here's the thing. As is quite obvious by the preceding discussion there is a split in the current nursing environment among the various levels of education. Therefore, it is fairly safe to say that by creating a standard level of education we would likely reduce (not totally eliminate) this diversive factor.

The question is what SHOULD be the minimum education level? Generally in the working world the higher the level of education for a job the greater respect it is given. Generally the greater degree of complexity and responsibilty of a job the higher the level of education required. Following this logic you could surmise that the BScN would likely be the ideal choice.

To clarify I am NOT saying that a BScN necessarily makes you a better nurse, initially prepares you better or worse, gives you super powers, etc. When I say higher degree of education I am talking academic perception only. Very few people would regard a college diploma as higher than a university degree.

I agree with sheripa's point that anyone can consider themselves a professional regardless of their level of education. However that does not mean others will share that view. I would consider a McDonald's employee who was polite, efficient and well mannered to act in a professional manner but I would not call them a professional. A slovenly attired, poorly spoken engineer would likely still be called a professional on the basis of their job and educational background. As well, if you go around calling yourself a "glorified butt wiper" don't expect many people to consider that professional....

On that note, I agree that total care is an important part of nursing in many areas. Definately not the main part though. Assessment, intervention and evaluation, the nursing process is the heart of nursing. Total care may be the task that takes up most of your day but that's all it is. A task. Many people could do that. Many people besides nurses do. However what they cannot do is provide the comprehensive assessment and evaluation throughout the total care process that nurses do. They cannot formulate interventions based on their assessment findings... well some probably could but not with the degree of certainty nurses should be able to.... When I am cleanig feces off a patient, that is not what I am focussed on. I am assessing the factors why they are incontinent (probably obvious but not always), their skin condition, problem solving if they is any way to avoid incontince, etc. That is how I differ from others who could do that job. I bring my pracitcal experience and education with me through all my daily tasks. Nurses can do many things and do them all well. That is both our strength and our curse in my opinion.

Cheers,

J-P

Originally posted by Lburns:

It is my firm belief that the minimum requirement for nursing should be a BSN. We want to be accepted as a profession, yet we allow 2 year programs to dominate the field. Now I went to a 2 year program and will be finishing my BSN this semester. My school did a great job preparing me for "tasks" of nursing, but oh, it is so much more than that. Many other countries have moved or are moving towards 4yr degree minimums and the US needs to stay atop in this competative field. The nursing shortage will not always be here and it is to your advantage to get your degree now. The 2 yr programs will make a great footstep in the years to come, but the 4yr degree will become the RNs of the future. As nurses move into the 21st century we need to pull together to demonstrate our power as a profession, the only way to do this is to have strong, educated nurses in not just bedside tasks but critically thinking, politics, research and community health. Think about it, comments welcome.

Originally posted by Lburns:

It is my firm belief that the minimum requirement for nursing should be a BSN. We want to be accepted as a profession, yet we allow 2 year programs to dominate the field. Now I went to a 2 year program and will be finishing my BSN this semester. My school did a great job preparing me for "tasks" of nursing, but oh, it is so much more than that. Many other countries have moved or are moving towards 4yr degree minimums and the US needs to stay atop in this competative field. The nursing shortage will not always be here and it is to your advantage to get your degree now. The 2 yr programs will make a great footstep in the years to come, but the 4yr degree will become the RNs of the future. As nurses move into the 21st century we need to pull together to demonstrate our power as a profession, the only way to do this is to have strong, educated nurses in not just bedside tasks but critically thinking, politics, research and community health. Think about it, comments welcome.

Hi. I guess I'm a realist. I think alot of diploma and AD nurses go back to school to get their RN because hopefully doors to more higher paying nursing jobs and pay increases in nursing will come their way. It is so difficult to pay the bills these days and improve our lives and our families lives! Money opens doors in life and gives you more choices and most importantly security (to be able to save to live off the interest of your savings like my parents do) This is why we go back for our BSN and or MSN and even if we do we have to search for the higher paying jobs that are not stessful (higher stress is definitly not worth the increase in pay) Any way, the bottom line is income at a meanful job where a nurse feels he/she is providing a worthwhile service toward a heathy community! Education is always an asset, but the the main reason one gets the paper degree is to have more "choices" for income and less stressful jobs, thus improving ones life and the lives of our immediate families! What do others think about this? smile.gif

------------------

SLW

Hi. I guess I'm a realist. I think alot of diploma and AD nurses go back to school to get their RN because hopefully doors to more higher paying nursing jobs and pay increases in nursing will come their way. It is so difficult to pay the bills these days and improve our lives and our families lives! Money opens doors in life and gives you more choices and most importantly security (to be able to save to live off the interest of your savings like my parents do) This is why we go back for our BSN and or MSN and even if we do we have to search for the higher paying jobs that are not stessful (higher stress is definitly not worth the increase in pay) Any way, the bottom line is income at a meanful job where a nurse feels he/she is providing a worthwhile service toward a heathy community! Education is always an asset, but the the main reason one gets the paper degree is to have more "choices" for income and less stressful jobs, thus improving ones life and the lives of our immediate families! What do others think about this? smile.gif

------------------

SLW

+ Add a Comment