Published Mar 19, 2006
Mijourney
1,301 Posts
If an NP bills under a physician's number, does this mean that the physician supervised them on that office visit? Can a NP bill under a physician's number without that physician being within vicinity?
sirI, MSN, APRN, NP
17 Articles; 45,819 Posts
hello mijourney,
in my area, the np can bill under the physician's number. no, it does not mean the physician is supervising. yes, the np can bill without the physician in the vicinity.
in my area.
NRSKarenRN, BSN, RN
10 Articles; 18,926 Posts
best advice i've seen --really understands medicare rules--- is from carolyn burppert rn, jd; posts to medscape and has own website.
billing for nurse practitioner services
learn the basics for billing np services, including. ... can be reached at http://www.buppert.com. medscape nurses 4(1), 2002. © 2002 medscape portals, inc ...
www.medscape.com/viewarticle/422935
thank you, nrskarenrn, for the links and the information.
HeartsOpenWide, RN
1 Article; 2,889 Posts
In my area no. The Physician does not have to be present. We have to branches to our office and on one we only have a doctor there on Mondays, tuesdays, and wednesday mornings (FNP's by themselves the rest of the week). But they can still bill out.
Then I guess my question is that if physicians are not supervising the NP but the NP is using the physician's number to bill with isn't that a problem that could lead to chart audits? It would seem to me that the NP would bill under their own number if they don't require supervision from the physician. I don't mean to be difficult but what is the benefit of billing under the physician's number if they are not supervising the NP?