A bill sent to the Senate in South Dakota would penalize physicians who provide treatments for transgender youth. Lawmakers from other states are considering similar bills as advocacy groups stand in opposition. Read on to learn about the debate around House Bill 1057.
South Dakota’s House of Representatives approved a bill, on February 29th, that would criminalize physicians who treat transgender children with hormones and sex reassignment surgeries. The Vulnerable Child Protection Act will now be sent to the state’s Senate for a committee hearing. Rep. Fred Deutsch, the bill’s primary sponsor, explains the legislation will protect vulnerable children who “are being chemically castrated, sterilized and surgical mutilated.
South Dakota’s House of Representatives is the first state to pass a bill to restrict medical treatment for trangender teens. However, more than half a dozen state houses are considering similar bills.
Under the bill, it would be a Class 1 misdemeanor for a physician to prescribe hormone replacement therapy or perform sex reassignment surgery to youth under the age of 16. This includes:
Performing a mastectomy
The penalty would be a maximum of 1 year in jail and a fine of $2,000. Nurses would be exempt from prosecution.
Republicans and Democrats debate represent a larger culture war with conflicting values, beliefs and practices. The debate is bigger than just the medical issues and extends into parenting and the role of physicians.
Parents, many members of the medical community and advocates of transgender youths make the following arguments (although there are many more) in opposition to House Bill 1057:
Libby Skarin, policy director for the American Civil Liberties Union of South Dakota, issued a statement after the vote, stating “By blocking medical care supported by every major medical association, the legislature is compromising the health of trans youth in dangerous and potentially life-threatening ways.”
A conservative Christian organization, Liberty Counsel, has offered legal counsel to defend bill, at no cost to state taxpayers.
Lawmakers supporting the bill make debate these points (among others):
The website https://hb1057.com/, promotes Deutsch’s bill and features resources and videos from the Heritage Foundation, the Minnesota Family Council, a Christian organization.
In 2018, the American Nurses Association released a position statement, Nursing Advocacy for LGBTQ+ Populations and applied the nursing code of ethics to this population.
Quote“..nurses must advocate for patient centered treatment, equal access, equal services, and equal resources for all populations that may be adversely affected by bias or prejudice. Nurses have an ethical duty to honor and respect the identities, beliefs, values, and decisions of all patients.”
ANA Position Statement: Nursing Advocacy for LGBTQ+ Populations
How do you think this ethical duty of nursing fits into the debate around limiting transgender healthcare for youth?
Let us hear from you!
On 12/16/2021 at 11:18 AM, RuralMOSchoolRN said:Medscape recently had an article regarding transgender teens and young people and guidelines for surgical procedures. An interesting research study is in the article...
The most recent published data seen by Medscape Medical News relates to a study from March 2021 that showed nearly 88% of boys who struggled with gender identity in childhood (approximate mean age 8 years and follow-up at approximate mean age 20 years) desisted. It reads: "Of the 139 participants, 17 (12.2%) were classified as 'persisters' and the remaining 122 (87.8%) were classified as desisters."
"Most children with gender dysphoria will desist and lose their concept of themselves as being the opposite gender," Mason explains.
The article can be found here: https://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/964604#vp_1
All the more reason to not let children be allowed to choose to have a body morphing surgery.
2 hours ago, KalipsoRed21 said:Bullying is bad.
So why do it? When you say, and I quote:
", but because the homosexual and transgendered seem to feel they have a monopoly on being abused by teenaged peers."
..that is a very bullying, innacurate statement which totally belittles the experiences of homosexual and transgendered teenagers.
The rest of your post sumply regurgitates past points, hence I will regurgitate that neither I nor the video I posted advocated surgery for minors but other reversable treatments.
Again I refer you to the above quoted paper which puts into question the types of research you accept blindly regarding post gender reassignment expereinces.
4 hours ago, DavidFR said:So why do it? When you say, and I quote:
", but because the homosexual and transgendered seem to feel they have a monopoly on being abused by teenaged peers."
..that is a very bullying, innacurate statement which totally belittles the experiences of homosexual and transgendered teenagers.
The rest of your post sumply regurgitates past points, hence I will regurgitate that neither I nor the video I posted advocated surgery for minors but other reversable treatments.
Again I refer you to the above quoted paper which puts into question the types of research you accept blindly regarding post gender reassignment expereinces.
", but because the homosexual and transgendered seem to feel they have a monopoly on being abused by teenaged peers."
So sorry David, let me fix this statement for you. Homosexual and transgendered people do not have a monopoly on being abused by teenaged peers and bullying is a poor excuse to allow surgical intervention. Bullying is part of life and it will be forevermore.
19 hours ago, KalipsoRed21 said:", but because the homosexual and transgendered seem to feel they have a monopoly on being abused by teenaged peers."
So sorry David, let me fix this statement for you. Homosexual and transgendered people do not have a monopoly on being abused by teenaged peers and bullying is a poor excuse to allow surgical intervention. Bullying is part of life and it will be forevermore.
Again you rant on about surgery. Nobody is advocating surgery for minors. Surgery for grown adults who have been medically and psychologically assessed is another matter.
Now let me fix you on your statement. I never claimed homosexual teenagers have the monopoly on being bullied. Nor have I seen gays or trans people claim they have a monopoly on being bullied. I have seen gays and trans people quite rightfully talk abut their distress at having been bullied as teenagers, just as you quite rightfully express your feelings about having been bullied for having red hair. I would never belittle your experiences. However when you incorrectly say:
", but because the homosexual and transgendered seem to feel they have a monopoly on being abused by teenaged peers."
you belittle both the gay and the trans experience. This is just like the racist that tells the black person they have a chip on their shoulder, all is OK really. This is just like the misogynist who tells the little woman to know her place and stop being silly. This IS bullying in itself.
Scream all you wish that you're neither homophobic nor transphobic, and possibly you're not, however when you put things in this way, that is sure how it seems.
KalipsoRed21, BSN, RN
495 Posts
Bullying is bad. Bullying is also part of living in a society…any society. Allowing youths who barely know themselves to have surgical procedures to change themselves to what they want to be before they learn to deal with themselves AND society is a poor idea. No one under 18 should be allowed to have any surgery merely to look how they wish to.
No, I’m not taking my hurt feelings out on anyone. I’m 40 and worked through the pain of the horrific bullying I experienced and learned to accept myself. But that remains my point, work through it, but quit using it as a sole reason everyone should accept the way one group of people want the world to change. Bullying is never going to be gone, hopefully it will be less violent.