Published
I'm sure it's not actually cheap, but heard it was cheap compared to others, and more difficult to use. I really don't have the specifics since I am not employed at this particular clinic, but was told the switch from paper charts to this EMR was/is nightmarish and setting up the charts for the next day takes forever. They are still pulling the paper charts at this point also. That's about all I know. Point is isn't this push toward all EMRs supposed to improve the work load? Seems all about reimbursement, and to hell with the added stress on the worker bees.
I think the switch from paper to electronic is a nightmare no matter what system you use to at least some extent. Maybe more so with Allscripts. Not sure, that's the only one I have experience with. I was there for the transition from paper to electronic and it WAS a nightmare. It takes a lot of time to get the electronic chart populated with patient info. Luckily the old transcription from old office visits carried over, but if it was handwritten the only way to access it was to get the paper chart. Then populating the med lists, problem lists, etc. The only way to populate was manual data entry. It was a lot of work and a lot of late nights at work.
The worst part about allscripts is that if you're typing something in one screen, you can't save a draft or minimize, so you try to copy what you wrote so you can go to another screen when you get interrupted (always) and then you try to paste your stuff sometimes and some screens will take it and some won't, so you end up starting all over again. It makes documenting a nightmare.
Bluelight, I would hate Allscripts too if that was how it functioned when I use it. It doesn't do that at the clinic where I use it. Everything automatically saves, and I constantly flip between charting, reviewing labs, HPI, CC, etc. Minimizing doesn't affect it either. Good luck with it.
Blindsided
245 Posts
Anyone using Allscripts EMR in the office and how is it going? Opinions please. Thanks.