Published Jul 15, 2009
doesntlookgood
41 Posts
http://www.cnn.com/2009/HEALTH/07/14/colorado.doolie.flu/index.html
The thing I find worrisome here...
The AFA is a VERY highly regimented environment, especially for Freshman.
Hopefully they'll utilize this as the perfect "control" case and learn lessons about containment / treatment / mass casualty / information dissemination processes.
oramar
5,758 Posts
The 70 that showed symptoms but tested negative makes me shake my head. I wonder if considering the kind of heavy exposure they had and their symptoms, not to mention their age, that at least a large portion of negatives are are really positive? Could that means the current test in use has a larger failure rate than we originally thought?
indigo girl
5,173 Posts
Docs are supposed to look at the clinical picture. If they had s/s, at least some were likely false negatives. The problems with the rapid flu tests are well known.
These kids will still be shedding virus for up to 7 days. It should be expected that more cadets will become ill. There may also be some that will be asymptomatic but still positive, and also shedding virus.
nerdtonurse?, BSN, RN
1 Article; 2,043 Posts
Keep in mind, the 1918 outbreak really got cooking stateside in military camps; Ft. Riley, KS, and Ft. Devens, MA stick out. Look up what happened at Devens, and then tell yourself, this will happen again.
Docs are supposed to look at the clinical picture. If they had s/s, at least some were likely false negatives. The problems with the rapid flu tests are well known. These kids will still be shedding virus for up to 7 days. It should be expected that more cadets will become ill. There may also be some that will be asymptomatic but still positive, and also shedding virus.
meme048
60 Posts
I believe the book your talking about is:
Barry, John. The Great Influenza: The Epic Story of the Deadliest Plague in History
Here is a link to other books on this subject:
http://1918.pandemicflu.gov/learn_more/01.htm
Maria