Published Jan 23, 2019
doro8144
27 Posts
Hello,
I am 44 years old. I have been an RN since I was 20 (earned my ADN straight out of high school). I have 23 years of experience in med- surg, LTAC, dialysis. I am updating my resume in hopes of finding new opportunities.
I felt as if I need help with writing my resume and "selling myself". I submitted my rough draft resume to a service through Monster.com and after a few days I received a sparkling new, updated one. However, it only lists my experience going back 15 years. Even on the cover letter it mentions "15 years". I emailed the writer and questioned this. I received this reply:
Hi Doro,
I'm so sorry that I forgot to clarify why the dates were changed. Ordinarily I explain that when I send the draft. Due to the very real problem of age discrimination and because hiring managers are not concerned with earlier work, our policy is to go back only ~15 years. Unfortunately, in our society, youth has more value than experience. However, if you feel you definitely want all your years of work mentioned, then I will make that change. Let me know please.
Best,
"Monster Resume Writer" (names have been changed)
So, what do you think? I felt a little hurt at first, because I don't think I am "older", and there are distinct advantages to hiring people older than their 20's-30's and I think some employers know this too. I also think it is kind of "dishonest"? Then again, she may have a very good point! Opinions and comments please!
Thanks,
Doro8144
NICU Guy, BSN, RN
4,161 Posts
I am not seeing the harm in putting down 15 years. If you had changed jobs every 5 yrs. you would only put the last 3 jobs on your resume (last 15 years). Do you think that an employer would hire you more easily if you showed 23 yrs experience than 15 yrs experience?
36 minutes ago, doro8144 said:there are distinct advantages to hiring people older than their 20's-30's and I think some employers know this too.
there are distinct advantages to hiring people older than their 20's-30's and I think some employers know this too.
I think there is an advantage of hiring a 35 yr old with 15 yrs experience over a 22 yr old with 2 yrs experience. But, there is no significant difference hiring a 43 yr old with 23 yrs experience over a 35 yr old with 15 yrs experience.
Natkat, BSN, MSN, RN
872 Posts
I feel that ageism is keeping me from finding a better job. I am 57 years old and 11 years of experience. I know it's illegal to ask a person's age, but they can ask you when you graduated from high school. I get asked this question a lot on job applications. As a result, I never get any calls back. It might be a coincidence but my feeling is that it's not.