Nurses Helping Nurses
allnurses Network: Central | Jobs | Books | Newsletter
allnurses: A Nursing Community for Nurses
Home General News Blogs Articles Students Region Specialty Degrees F.A.Q.
Pulmonary Nursing /

leaving people with PEs on non acute units



Did You Know?
allnurses is the largest community for nurses on the web. We now have over 388,766 members! Join today to network with other nurses, laugh, share, and much more.

Mar 17, 2006 10:49 AM

leaving people with PEs on non acute units

by oramar allnurses Guide

A patient was about to be discharged from non acute unit when he developed sever dyspnea, his pulse ox was in the 70s on R/A. O2 at 6L only got the patient up to 80s. A scan was positive for bilat PEs. A pulmonologist was consulted and wanted the patient to remain on non acute unit and recieve Lovenox. The attending overroad the order and insisted the patient be transfered to ICU and go on heparin drip. Is the treatment the pulmonologist ordered something new? I know I have not worked in acute for 6 years and things might have changed.


Share

Search Tags
None
Top

 
Advertisement
Sponsored Links
 
Reply
2 Comments
No. 1
from suzanne4
Old Mar 17, 2006, 12:30 PM

Default Re: leaving people with PEs on non acute units
Lovenox is low-molecular weight heparin. Pts can actually be sent home on that, and give themselves SQ injections twice a day.

If a VQ scan, then the best result that would be given by radiologist is "high probability" -- they are never absolute with it. Would require a CT scan to confirm.

If the pulmonologist feels comfortable with leaving the patient there, then he is taking the responsibility for it. Not all patients with pulmonaru emboli need to go to the ICU. Are there issues that he was concerned with such as increased bleeding with full dose heparin? There are alot of other issues involved with this.
Top
 
No. 2
from sirI
Old Mar 17, 2006, 12:55 PM

Default Re: leaving people with PEs on non acute units
In addition to what suzanne4 stated, it depends upon the facility as well.

If the pulmonologist is "in house" the probability of leaving a patient in a non-actute area might be entertained. But, if a pulmonologist is not readily available, the decision to place in an acute-care area (ICU) would probably be made.

Also, consultation with a specialist is just that, consultation. Totally an expert opinion to take under advisement. Not necessarily the end-all be-all final decision.
Top
 
Reply




Thread Tools


Who's Online
212 members
1,710 guests
1,922

4

Four Lehigh Valley Health Network nurses accused of...

48

lawsuit - But don't most RN's work through breaks/lunch...

0

Patient Evaluation of Retail Clinic Care

7

The hard to reach on-call doctor, and its effects on...

11

Woman charged with passing off prescription drug as...

26

Man in "Vegetative State" was conscious for 23...

2

Interesting article on ThedaCare's Collaborative Care Model

14

Possible breakthrough regarding MS

63

16th Philly area hospital to stop delivering babies: Mercy...

14

Really interesting article on Indian open hearts






Currently Reading This Page: 1 (0 members & 1 guests)

Interested in the hottest topics of the week? Subscribe to the Nurse-zine Newsletter.
Enter email address: