Do New Graduate Nurses Need a Formal Residency Program?

The following article closely examines the current curriculum of the generic four year baccalaureate degree and questions the inherent limitations of clinical nurse training in the academic setting as well as the orientation process for new graduate registered nurses (RNs) in the hospital organization setting. The author explores the structure of medical training residency programs to address reality shock in new graduate nurses and discusses the benefits of a structured transition program for new graduate nurses. Nurses Career Support Article

After four years of nursing school, do nurses need this additional training? To answer this question, it is prudent to examine the traditional four year baccalaureate nursing curriculum. In general, the first two years of study are dedicated to the fulfillment of general education courses such as English, history, statistics and any other non-nursing courses mandated to meet graduation requirements. Other courses while non-nursing in scope are necessary to build a strong foundation toward nursing theory. Such courses include nutrition, chemistry, organic chemistry, microbiology, anatomy and physiology I and II and sometime physics and pathophysiology. It is not until the last two years of the curriculum that students immerse themselves in the core nursing theory and clinical practice.

What happens in the last two years? In the United States nurses are trained as generalist nurses, this means that the student is not required to focus on specialization. Therefore, the student nurse is rotated through one rotation or semester of pediatrics, obstetrics, psychiatric, and community. The emphasis is placed on adult and older adult which together may consist of two clinical rotations. The last clinical rotation is the preceptorship where students are paired one-to-one with a professional registered nurse and work more independent of clinical faculty.

It is not until the senior preceptor-preceptee training period that students have a more "real world" feel for the autonomy of nursing practice. Clinical rotations in nursing school do not mimic the full responsibilities of a professional registered nurse. Yes, during earlier rotations students are exposed to bits and pieces of various aspects of the field to learn the why and how things are done, but with clinical faculty to student ratio set at 1:10 the clinical rotation experience is limited.

What happens then during a semester rotation? If there are 12 patients on a floor and there are only 2 RN's and one technician. Ideally, the student group would be divided evenly among the two nurses so that each nurse would provide report to five students. This is not always the case as some nurses do not want to mentor students, patients refuse to have student nurses, or the patient census decreases.

For each rotation there is a new unit or hospital; the learning process in interrupted. Students must acclimate to new surroundings become familiar with the nursing staff, type of equipment; learn the layout of the unit, and everyday routines of the unit. In addition, students need to familiarize themselves with the "regulars" identified as physicians and other healthcare providers who work on the unit daily, as well as learn with charting systems and communication networks on how to contact providers and hospital departments.

Nursing and ancillary staff tend to be reserved in their interactions uncertain of student nurse scope of practice, and skill level. Clinical becomes focused on setting the patient up for the day and a how to list such as how to read and understand daily orders, how to administer medication, how to document in the electronic record, and how to work the smart pump. Students become more focused on "task", but the nurses' role exceeds far beyond the few items on a check list to accomplish during the day. It is not until the graduate nurse starts their first job that they are immersed in an overwhelming world of responsibility.

What about new nurse orientation process? Yes, each time a nurse is hired whether a newly graduated nurse or a seasoned nurse with years of experience there is the same orientation process. The orientation process is developed to familiarize nurses to the hospital and routines of the department. New hires are evaluated on their ability to function as an autonomous nurse. It is understood that a nurse with years of experience would need less time being mentored than a new graduate nurse.

The new graduate nurse needs more then what the generic orientation process offers, unlike nurses with years of practice, new graduate nurses experience high levels of anxiety, fear, and frustration related to meeting the needs of the individual patient and the needs of the setting (Kramer, 1974), learning and practicing new invasive procedural skills, delegating to ancillary staff, collaborating with and reporting to physicians on a frequent basis. For even the most experienced RN the hospital environment is considered at times very stressful, demanding, and not conducive to providing safe patient care with increasing responsibilities, more technology, high nurse-to-patient ratios, and higher acuity patients. Nurses have taken a greater role doing more invasive procedures from phlebotomy, urinary catheter insertion, nasogastric tube insertion, bladder irrigation, insertion peripheral intravenous catheter, wound and chest tube management, to name a few. Today, patients admitted to a medical/surgical floor are patients who in the past would have been admitted to the intensive care unit. The current orientation process plays a limited role to the socialization of new graduate nurse.

What's the problem? The turnover rate among newly graduated RNs is extremely high. Turnover is defined as the number of new graduate RNs that leave a position before 12 months (Trepanier, Early, Ulrich, & Cherry, 2012). In a survey conducted by Bowles and Candela (2005), perceptions of first job experience nurses new to the profession, 30% left their job within the first year of employment and 57% left their first job within two years of employment. Twenty-six percent of survey respondents cited the most common reason for leaving was stress caring for high acuity patients, feeling patient care was unsafe, and unacceptable nurse-to-patient ratios (Bowles & Candela, 2005). Similar comments were discussed by Beecroft, Kunzman, and Krozek (2001) who reported new graduate nurse turnover rates of 35% to 60% within the first year of employment. In addition to concerns about new graduate nurse turnover the loss financially is approximately $40,000 in employer hiring and orientation expenses (Halfer & Graf, 2006), but even a conservative estimate of $10,000 per RN results in a substantial financial loss (The HSM Group, Ltd, 2002). Reality shock is proposed to contribute to a majority of new graduate RN turnover.

What can we learn from medicine? What are the benefits of residency? The residency experience for medicine is now a common expectation not only from medical graduates but those who hire physicians. Dr. William Osler, a British Canadian who arrived in 1888, known as one of the four founding physicians of Johns Hopkins Medicine is best known for the establishment of the medical residency program (The Johns Hopkins University, n.d.). The success of the program is credited to the developed pyramidal structure consistent of medical students, interns, fewer assistant residents, and a single chief resident (The Johns Hopkins University, n.d.). The pyramidal hierarchy is an excellent example of well-planned socialization. Training is developed to immerse individuals and gradually increase responsibility and accountability. This gradual immersion into the profession with its built-in support system allows individuals to develop a greater sense of control and decrease level of stress.

Kramer (1974) identified that new nurse graduates experienced increase anxiety, and increase fear in the first 12 months of clinical practice. This is not to say that the nursing profession should adopt an intricate system, but at the informal level it is easy to identify a similar hierarchy in the nursing field with student nurses, new graduate nurses, nurses, and veteran nurses. The Institute of Medicine's (2011) Future of Nursing recommendations support the development of nurse residency programs for both the RN and APRN level. New graduate nurse transition programs have been documented to increase retention rates in organizations (Chappell, 2014; Mennick, 2007), greater satisfaction with mastery of work organization and clinical task (Halfer & Graf, 2006). Recently, the findings from a new graduate nurse residency program reported a decrease in the 12-month turnover rate from 36% to 6% (Trepanier et al., 2012).

What are some components to nursing residency? In addition to the normal orientation process, transition programs should be at least one-year in length, include peer-to-peer interaction, debriefing, self-reflection, mentor support programs, (Chappell, 2014) and skills development. Trepanier et al (2012) described components to nursing residency that consisted of five categories didactic direct instruction, clinical immersion and competency validation, looping, mentoring, and supportive debriefing. A brief description of each follows. The didactic direct instruction and case study takes 15-20% of RN residency incorporating core concepts and multispecialty classes such as 12 lead ECG. Clinical immersion and competency validation process promotes the application of content. At this phase, the new graduate is not primarily responsible for direct patient care, but works under close supervision of the preceptor. Looping is a term used to describe the floating of new graduates to floors outside their dedicated learning unit where patients may have been transferred or admitted to the dedicated learning unit. For example, if the dedicated learning unit is the intensive care unit then time may be spent in the emergency department and the operating room. Supportive mentoring includes assigned mentor circle groups that are facilitated by experienced RNs and includes special topics such as career development. Supportive debriefing allows new graduates to discuss their experiences and voice their feelings (Trepanier et al., 2012).

This article has highlighted many of the limitations to the training of student nurses in nursing school and the inadequacies of hospital orientation for the new graduate nurse. New graduate RN residency programs are a human capital project that assists not only nurses, but also improves patient outcomes. Kelly (2014) reported shorter patient length of stay (LOS) when RNs worked on the same unit for at least one year. Nurse residency programs are a worthwhile investment that requires more resource, funding and further consideration by nurse leadership and hospital organizations.

References

Beecroft, P., Kunzman, L., & Krozek, C. (2001). RN internship: Outcomes of a one-year pilot program. Journal of Nursing Administration, 31(12), 575-582.

Bowles, C., & Candela, L. (2005). First job experiences of recent RN graduates. JONA, 35(3), 130-137.

Chappell, K. (2014). The value of RN residency and fellowship programs for Magnet Hospitals. JONA, 44(6), 313-314.

Halfer, D., & Graf, E. (2006). Graduate nurse perceptions of the work experience. Nurse Economics, 24(3), 150-155.

The HSM Group, Ltd. (2002) Acute care hospital survey of RN vacancy and turnover rates in 2000. JONA, 32(9), 437-439.

The Johns Hopkins University. (n.d.). The four founding physicians. Johns Hopkins Medicine. Retrived on June 18, 2014 from https://www.hopkinsmedicine.org/about/history/history5.html

Kelly, J.C. (2014). Nurse tenure, education linked to shorter hospital stays. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 6, 231-259.

Kramer, M. (1974). Reality shock: Why nurses leave nursing. St. Louis, MO: Mosby.

Mennick, F. (2007). Keeping new RNs in their jobs. American Journal of Nursing, 107(12), 21.

Trepanier,S., Early, S., Ulrich, B., & Cherry, B. (2012). New graduate nurse residency program. Nurse Economics, 30(4), 207-214.

Specializes in LTAC, ICU, ER, Informatics.

The ER where I work has a six month new grad program that appears to be helping with competency and retention. The program has classroom time for the first few months along with precepted shifts, and at the end is 100% precepted shifts. I'm not sure if they sign an agreement to stay 2 years or buy out, but I'd not be surprised.

Coming in with a year's experience as an RN but no ER experience, they had a transition program that was about 12 weeks with about 6 days of classroom time devoted to ER specific training, which is unheard of in this area. I felt it was about right, and appreciated having it. I was asked to commit to 1-2 years, but didn't have to sign any official anything.

Experienced ER nurses for comparison, get essentially a 4 week orientation with a preceptor.

I went through an ASN program with over 600 clinical hours, and I certainly didn't feel prepared to actually function as a nurse. While I ended up parting ways with my 1st employer, I will forever be grateful that they gave me - while not a formal residency - a decent orientation period with some critical care classroom time to improve my practice.

I think properly executed residency programs are very beneficial for new grads, and like the idea of a shortened version for nurses changing specialties. The key word of course is "properly executed".

I haven't seen anyone comment on the biggest issue - nursing school today does not prepare you to be a nurse, it prepares you to pass the NCLEX. The experience that you can get through a good residency or the six- or 12-week new grad orientation is experience that student nurses should be getting in school.

Specializes in Primary Care; Child Advocacy; Child Abuse; ED.
I haven't seen anyone comment on the biggest issue - nursing school today does not prepare you to be a nurse, it prepares you to pass the NCLEX. The experience that you can get through a good residency or the six- or 12-week new grad orientation is experience that student nurses should be getting in school.

That is a very interesting concept! Better clinical prepared nurses would possible not have a hard time finding a job because hospitals would not have to pay as much to train.

Specializes in critical care.

This is a beautiful and well crafted piece.

As a new grad in a residency program that genuinely I believe at my facility is a fancy title for "we'll do our inservices all up front and you'll have 5 more weeks with a preceptor", I feel like the level of detail you describe necessary is a bit disheartening. For a few reasons.

First - if nursing school truly prepared us, rather than gave us baseline NCLEX knowledge, we wouldn't require the educational complements of residencies as much. Hospitals being required to put in so much of what we hope to get from nursing school when, as you say, turn over is so high, is a terrible leap of faith that they will stop investing in eventually. As a new grad, I WANT my residency, in spite of it not really being the most well-rounded, well-developed experience because I know I need these training wheels.

Second - turnover. When they interviewed, they were very clear that we would not choose our own floor. Now, my preceptorship was on my currently-employed-at unit. It was quite the gamble when I went in guns blazing, but during my interview I was extremely open about the type of person I am and what I'm looking for. Thankfully it was a fantastic gamble because I won. Another person in my group got on a unit that is traditionally ortho post OP and she is quite disappointed. I'll be shocked if they retain her. I know they want what is the best fit in THEIR opinion but when the employees opinion has nothing to do with placement, you just aren't going to keep them. Of course there are the issues already noted in your article, but that one thing is a big deal. We're told in school - if you specialize right out of school you will never get out. But if we don't go where we want to, we aren't going to stay. It's a terrible double-edged sword. It sort of makes me wonder if non-generalist nursing program availability could solve this and the scared newbie problem.

Third - the non-uniform concept of residencies. You can stick a listing on your website that says "residency" but what does that even mean??? My group had a non-new grad with us the entire time. I'm all for him getting the education he needs, of course, but why tell us that we're an isolated group of new hires that will be given this special program if it was actually open to other new hires? Beyond that the only thing different about the residency is the extra precepted weeks. We all have the same exact check lists. This should be formalized. This should be a well defined concept. When we were going through the interview/new hire process, they really made it a big deal that there were nearly 300 applicants and we were the chosen few for this amazing opportunity.

All that complaining aside, I genuinely am thankful for the little bit extra we have gotten and simply having employment is quite a gift. I hope my critique doesn't come across as purely ungrateful complaining. Whether school or hospitals fill this gap, clearly it is NEEDED. I believe this resource needs to be more refined, improved. If it's done right, with employees having the ability to choose from available placements, and with residency being a formalized concept, retention would be better. The investment would be worth it.

That is a very interesting concept! Better clinical prepared nurses would possible not have a hard time finding a job because hospitals would not have to pay as much to train.

The clinical requirement for nursing schools is less than 800 hours, and up to 25% of that can be lab simulations. (I know of at least one school in the Denver area that is doing simulations in lieu of actual clinical time because they can't get the clinical placements.) Hospitals are reluctant to hire new grads because they have to provide the training we should be receiving in school. Most practicums are five weeks when they should be a full semester. There was a lot to be said for the old diploma programs that were based in hospitals.

I know they want what is the best fit in THEIR opinion but when the employees opinion has nothing to do with placement, you just aren't going to keep them. Of course there are the issues already noted in your article, but that one thing is a big deal. We're told in school - if you specialize right out of school you will never get out. But if we don't go where we want to, we aren't going to stay. It's a terrible double-edged sword. It sort of makes me wonder if non-generalist nursing program availability could solve this and the scared newbie problem.

I agree. In school, everyone tells you to do a year or two of med-surg and then you can transfer anywhere. But a lot very good nurses don't like med-surg. My psych clinical instructor told us that if we want to go into psych, we should still do med-surg first so we don't lose our skills. Our reply was that we didn't have any skills to lose because you don't learn them in school.

Specializes in PACU, presurgical testing.

I have never thought about these downsides to nursing residencies; I agree that such programs should be regulated (like medical residencies) so that they are actually meaningful. I had a few classmates that did nurse residencies; they seemed happy enough with them, but we didn't have anything to compare them with.

I'd love to see well-thought-out residencies for nurses, but I can't think of how you would do it for some of the weird specialties, like my beloved PACU. Unless you work in a HUGE hospital, there just isn't the repetition that you need to hone clinical skills in a 3- or 6-month period (to wit: in 2 years, I have placed one Foley, drawn labs off one PICC, had two craniotomies requiring cranial nerve assessments, etc.), so I'd worry that it would be yet more hours in the sim lab and less with actual patients. I've sort of forged my way with a group of supportive colleagues that pull me in to do the unusual stuff!

I also know that learning those skills is only part of becoming a nurse, and that's not what really matters to the patients (even though not knowing how to do something can really slow you down)--it's the experience to think, ask the right questions, and understand what's going on. That just takes plain old time, whether in a residency or just on the job.

Specializes in Geriatrics, Home Health.

I wish I'd been able to do a new grad residency. I graduated in 2008, just before the economic collapse. Hospitals wanted a BSN, which I didn't have, and even SNFs wanted 1 year of experience. It took 10 months to find my first job, at an ALF where I spent 90% of my time passing meds. In the jobs I've had, orientation has ranged from 2 hours to 2 weeks.

Nurses of yesteryear were able to hit the ground running because they had a lot of clinical time. When hospitals ran nursing schools, students were the evening shift. They also didn't have nearly as many practice restrictions. I managed to get through school without drawing blood, placing a foley (though I did 1 in-and-out cath), or a lot of other things. I volunteered in an ER, and applied for summer practicums (my school didn't offer one), but I graduated feeling like my skills were shaky. Whenever I expressed anxiety about my missing skills, I was told "You'll learn that on the job."

Something has to change, and since the schools and employers call the shots, I expect them to step up and do it. I work med surge, got a 12 week orientation, and continually got told I was doing great, even though all of the work couldn't possibly be completed correctly by a newbie. Now, off orientation, having not experienced many things (how could you?) and having 7 patients, they want to come to me and ask why things are being missed?? Did you really expect to take me from a know-nothing student to an experienced RN in 12 weeks? I'm amazed that there are aren't more problems.

@Camwill, do you mind me asking which residency program you are attending? I know I'm a few months late seeing this...so how do you like it as of now?

Greetings!

Question: To those who have applied to the UC Davis residency program or any other residency program, how are you placed in a specific area/speciality? You do list your top choices like medical school residency and then they choose who will be interviewed and placed in each position?

I'm still in nursing school and trying to get a clearer picture of my future options. Thanks ahead to any insight provided!

Nurses of yesteryear were able to hit the ground running because they had a lot of clinical time. When hospitals ran nursing schools, students were the evening shift.

"Yesteryear" meaning WWII, maybe. It's been a v. long time (many decades) since hospitals have been allowed (by regulatory and accrediting organizations) to use student nurses as free labor. In the hospital-based diploma program I attended in the early 1980s, the focus was on our nursing education and our status as students was carefully protected.

However, we did a gazillion more clinical hours and had a much broader, deeper range of clinical experience than students get in ADN or BSN programs, and we did graduate ready to enter practice and function as RNs. I got a much better nursing education than students in any of the ADN or BSN programs which with I've had experience since then have gotten. TPTB in nursing went to a lot of trouble to move nursing education out of hospitals and into colleges/universities, and I'm not sure that's been a good thing for nursing or new nurses.

People always like to talk about residencies for new grad nurses based on the medical model. Residents are getting paid a fraction of what "finished," practicing physicians make, the physician equivalent of minimum wage, and they are (practically) free labor for hospitals. How many new grad nurses would be willing to sign up for extended new grad "residencies" that would pay $8 or $9 an hour? New grads want to get paid the same as experienced, functioning RNs, but they are a financial liability for hospitals and other healthcare employers for at least the first year or so.

I don't blame hospitals for balking at hiring new grads and spending a lot of time and money teaching new graduate nurses stuff that they (the hospitals), rightly or wrongly, feel that people should have learned in nursing school. Esp. with the new nurse turnover rate higher than it's ever been. IMO, nursing education has "thrown the baby out with the bathwater."