Peer Reviews used as a tool to be malicious? - Page 2Register Today!
- Oct 5, '09 by classicdameVariance reports - that's another thing I remember about my last employer. People wrote up one another at the drop of a hat. That is PROHIBITED at my current facility. If you write someone up you better have a good reason and document it carefully or YOU will be the one in the CNO's office doing some explaining. We see it as a potential act of bullying. Variance reports here are more frequently written by the nurse who actually did whatever is being reported. They are not reasons to take punitive action against the employee. Obviously there are times when the remediation is required or when the documentation puts in motion a termination, but those do not happen a lot (thank heavens!). What is more likely is that risk mgmt, quality,infection control, and education get together to talk about trends and what can be done to prevent this type of situation.
- Oct 5, '09 by aileenveThis is a terrible idea as in every facility there is jealousy, envy, resentment etc. We have never done that- thank God but, A lot of people on day shift have issues with midnights leaving dry IV bags, wet patients, messy rooms, so I can imagine how bad it could get the manager should be the one to review staff on job performance..this is also how managers put their responsibilites back to the staff.
- Jul 1, '12 by MassEDI'm posting to bump this thread.
I just had my peer evaluation, which was all great minus a few nursing flow related points (not to get too specific, but doctor-nurse issues and communication issues) from one nurse. First, her name was on her evaluation of me. Secondly, she made ridiculous points based on her skewed nursing practice and her less than stellar nursing judgment. Her name was on her evaluation. I have to say, I would never place my name on a peer evaluation, because first, there's no way you cannot take offense. Secondly, when this nurse is up for evaluation, I will be always professional, but will provide her a nice thorough evaluation.... without my name, of course.
- Jul 1, '12 by MassEDI do have to say, when evaluations are done ANONYMOUSLY, it can be a great tool. Once I pointed out to my manager that actually putting a name on an evaluation WILL lead to resentment, animosity, retribution and all of those other things that come about, she agreed that a name should be removed if those issues could arise. Of course they can and will. As professionals, we should be able to accept constructive criticism, but evaluations should be expected to be professional and evaluated based on certain criteria. There are interpretations within nursing and each nurse has a way of going about the same thing in a different way. One would think that maturity is innate in nursing and thus evaluations, but it is not always. This is the issue with peer evaluations. I think for nurses to truly evaluate, they need to take ego out of the equation and point out positives and things that need to be worked on for that individual.
- Jul 1, '12 by Sue DamonasWhen I worked in the hospital we had to do the peer reviews and we all realized what BS they were, we all gave one another good reviews. I remember this one time that I was asked to say something negative about one of my coworkers and I wrote that I honestly could not think of anything negative.I was given grief but told them that I could not lie and would not.