Critical Thinking: you have it or you don't. Agree or disagree?

Nurses Professionalism

Published

I was told during my brief stint working med surg that you either have critical thinking or you don't. Thoughts?

Specializes in ICU.
I agree with you in that this is why some people struggle with it, but not an absolute. You just demonstrated that you reject the possibility of there being different reasons for struggling with critically thinking.

I'm not sure what you're saying here. I never once stated that I reject the possibility of there being different reasons for struggling with critical thinking. In fact, earlier on in the thread, I clearly stated that even those with the innate facility for critical thinking can struggle with it - if not given the proper tools to develop it in specific environments, situations or circumstances.

A person can reject ambiguity for a number of reasons. In my first post, the reason being that the novice does not yet have the facility to deal with ambiguity because he/she does not have a firm enough skill base to draw from. He/she must suspend the acceptance of ambiguity to some degree in order to develop a solid skill base.

My second post was in answer to a poster who described an individual or set of individuals who should have known better. They had the tools to be able to tell the difference, as experienced nurses, they had the skills – but chose instead to follow black and white thinking to the letter rather than think/act beyond that and accept that the application of their skills should be tailored in “gray” type situations.

I could read some studies and probably come out with all sorts of mitigating circumstances for rejection of ambiguity, but the fact would remain that rejection of ambiguity could very well be at the root of the struggle with critical thinking. Identifying the cause of rejection will help to overcome it, no doubt - but the end goal is the same - overcoming it...It's that old saying if you want to solve a problem, you have to first identify that there is a problem.

Specializes in ED, Telemetry,Hospice, ICU, Supervisor.

Critical thinking requires development, not many people are born with a highly developed level of critical thinking. Most people are born with enough to keep you alive and keep you going. School and life experience helps you develop what god gave you. No one was born a nuclear engineer.

Unless of course you are one of the few genuine geniuses who was born how to do advanced calculus.

Specializes in Pediatrics (neuro).

Disagree! You don't pop out of the womb knowing how to be a nurse. Likewise, critical thinking isn't something you just have or don't have. It's all a lifelong learning process.

Specializes in ICU.

Perhaps it is just that overcoming obstacles to critical thinking that may have been deeply ingrained in upbringing and childhood make it difficult for some to develop critical thought as adults.

I'm not sure what you're saying here. I never once stated that I reject the possibility of there being different reasons for struggling with critical thinking. In fact, earlier on in the thread, I clearly stated that even those with the innate facility for critical thinking can struggle with it - if not given the proper tools to develop it in specific environments, situations or circumstances.

I see now. In your second post,

Those who struggle with critical thinking reject the possibility that there is more than one answer to a question, more than one solution to a problem, or more than one way of looking at things. Plenty of "all or nothing" thinkers out there.

The way you explained it, it was like saying everyone who struggles with critically thinking is because they fail to think there is more than one answer. Which that statement has only one answer to why people struggle with critically thinking, excluding any other possibilities.

But in this post,

but the fact would remain that rejection of ambiguity could very well be at the root of the struggle with critical thinking.

You make it more clear that there may be more than one answer. Make sense? If not, I understand... I kept confusing myself because it's just a giant circle.

But now I get where you were going with it.

It's that old saying if you want to solve a problem, you have to first identify that there is a problem.

You remind me of a wise owl with this statement. You probably are...

Specializes in LTC Rehab Med/Surg.

Everybody does critical thinking every day of the week. Every job. Every task. Every interaction with anything breathing, even some things that aren't breathing. Critical thinking is just a fancy way to say problem solving. How to get from point A to B. Understanding the best possible course of action to achieve a certain goal.

Of course you can be taught that. Experience is undeniably the biggest factor, but how well you do at it depends on drive, determination, and intelligence. Throwing in intangibles like confidence, motivation and self worth, is what really determines who will excel and who won't.

Specializes in geriatrics.

Part of the issue with critical thinking "you either have it or you don't" is that some people, no matter how much they are mentored, no matter how much or how little experience they have, should not be employed in careers where problem solving skills are essential. Period. We all know someone who fits this desciption. Most definitely, this personality has other valuable skills and characteristics, but analytical problem solving just isn't one of them.

I'm not sure if I agree with that, or not, especially when it comes to nursing. Many new nurses may be great critical thinkers, but, are busy assimilating information and the situations presented, therefore they may appear to not be great critical thinkers. Nursing is a combination of academic and practical skills that can only be enhanced through experience. Understanding concepts from a textbook is different from having the experience needed to truly understand the issues at hand, so when it comes to critical thinking as a nurse, I would say that even those that may not "get it" right off the bat are certainly able to demonstrate critical thinking in time.

Specializes in Trauma.

I had a fellow student ask me last semester what is critical thinking exactly. I told her the best I can gather is it is not just knowing what but to know why. Example; It isn't just knowing a pt with COPD can't get high O2 levels but why they can't.

Specializes in ICU.
I see now. In your second post,

The way you explained it, it was like saying everyone who struggles with critically thinking is because they fail to think there is more than one answer. Which that statement has only one answer to why people struggle with critically thinking, excluding any other possibilities.

But in this post,

You make it more clear that there may be more than one answer. Make sense? If not, I understand... I kept confusing myself because it's just a giant circle.

But now I get where you were going with it.

You remind me of a wise owl with this statement. You probably are...

Thank you for reconsidering what I was getting at.

It can be kind of circular because in order to present a perspective for discussion I have to state it - but just because I didn't state it *and* 17 other perspectives doesn't necessarily mean I haven't considered those other perspectives or that I'm especially attached to the one I presented beyond exploring it as a possibility and discovering whether it is worth considering or not applicable.

I do believe that there is often more than one answer to a question, often informed by certain circumstances or mitigating factors. Like the example of the novice nurse with innate facility for critical thought who is unable to integrate it into a specific environment because the rules of the environment (and thus the parameters for applying critical thought successfully to that environment) are temporarily foreign to him/her or not well understood by him/her. Or conversely, the experienced nurse who knows the rules of the environment, knows that there are areas of gray and yet still thinks and acts in terms of black and white. Both are struggling with the same problem, for very different reasons, but the problem must still be addressed for each if either has any hope of overcoming it.

Extending the concept...

Just because they have the same problem doesn't necessarily mean it should be addressed in the same manner for both. Expecting the novice to perform as though he/she were intimately familiar with the rules of the environment before he/she has developed that intimate familiarity is not a reasonable expectation.

On the other hand, expecting the experienced nurse to perform to a standard befitting her knowledge of the rules of the environment is a reasonable expectation.

But now I'm off on a tangent. So I'll take a break for now. LOL

Look, at this point, I'd really value more logical, systematic thinking apart from emotional-reactionary thinking.

Also will add thatthe serious study of higher level mathematics helps with "critical thinking," especially word problems of higher order.

Dumbing down math and sciences for nursing programs is and will always be a huge mistake.

It seems to me that many of these posters are equating "critical thinking" with "experiential knowledge." This is not accurate. There are lots of people who have tons of experience who couldn't reason their ways out of damp paper bags. There are new nurses with little knowledge whose critical thinking is already in place-- and part of the evidence for that is that they mindfully seek out more parts to the puzzle when they can't see the solution clearly right off the bat.

This is not to say that these newbies were born with critical thinking skill, although those who were raised in an environment that rewarded and reinforced independent thought, curiosity, and problem-solving probably bring more to the table than those who weren't. Critical thinking can-- must-- be learned.

+ Add a Comment