Regulators aim to curb healthcare rescissions

  1. Regulators aim to curb healthcare rescissions

    Rules would have firms check applicants' fitness before issuing policies.
    By Lisa Girion, Los Angeles Times Staff Writer
    October 24, 2007

    State regulators moved Tuesday to limit insurers' ability to cancel medical coverage after patients get sick, proposing that companies be required to check up on an applicant's health before issuing a policy in the first place.

    The Department of Managed Health Care, which governs health plans known as HMOs, and the Department of Insurance, which supervises insurance companies, said they would propose rules that reinforced existing laws forbidding rescissions except when they could show a policyholder was at fault. It marked the first time the two agencies had acted in concert on any regulations....

    ... Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger recently signed into law a bill introduced by Assemblyman Hector De La Torre (D-South Gate) that will require insurers to pay hospitals and physicians for authorized care even if insurers later revoke coverage. The law takes effect in January.

    Both the proposed regulations and the bill were drafted to address problems associated with the loss of coverage that were highlighted in a series of articles in The Times. A state investigation into rescissions led to fines against Blue Cross of California and Kaiser Permanente.

    Insurance Commissioner Steve Poizner said the two agencies wanted consumers and the industry "to know that we will stand shoulder to shoulder to address" unjust rescissions....

    ... Insurers maintain that California law states a company doesn't have to prove that an applicant for a policy intended to mislead the company for it to cancel coverage.

    The proposed regulations say that a company can't cancel coverage unless a policyholder makes a "willful misrepresentation" on an application.

    "The law makes it clear that rescission generally does not require a showing of 'intent to deceive' or 'willful misrepresentation,' " said Shannon Troughton, a spokeswoman for Blue Cross parent WellPoint Inc.

    Blue Shield spokesman David Seldin said new rules could become a burden for consumers.

    "We are concerned that a broad requirement to prove willfulness will make it harder and more expensive for individuals to obtain coverage," he said....

    http://www.latimes.com/business/prin...es-pe-business
    •  
  2. 1 Comments

  3. by   oramar
    Oh is that why they say, "no physical required". If you get sick they are gona cancel anyway.

close