Is Health Care a Right?

Nurses Activism

Published

Just want to see your opinion (friendly discussion, no flaming, please). Is health care a right that should be enjoyed equally here in the U.S.? If so, how would this be financed without breaking the bank? How would you place limits (if any) on health care for all?

Actually, I think that all children ARE entitled to healthcare. I have a 7 year old handicapped brother and my mother is very poor and she has never paid anything out of pocket for his medical care. Some people may disagree with this, but he is an innocent little boy who has never harmed anyone. Also, not everyone who is on medicaid is nasty or violent . And some people may think that if people cannot afford to pay, then they should not be treated or shall receive minimal care, however that 48 year old chain smoking man who "trashed his health" is someone's father, husband, brother, son. To dice it up by excluding people for not taking better care of themselves is absurd. If insurance companies did that, most Americans wouldn't be covered, considering that the leading causes of hospitalization are CAD, lung cancer, diabetes, AIDS, accidents, etc. Most of these are preventable. As for alchoholics receiving liver transplants, believe me they are hardly at the top of the UNOS list. Most of them die before they would ever receive a transplant.

Nurse4kids, not everyone is capable of going to college and getting a better job. A lot of Americans work 2 or three minimum wage jobs to provide for their familes and are not offered insurance through their employers. A lot of uninsured Americans are students who ARE trying to get through college and get a better job, and are getting by waitressing or temping and pehaps they fall ill in the meantime. The point is not every American who is uninsured is a lowlife. A lot of them are good people and sometimes, shit happens. I don't know if universal health care is the answer, but I know some sort of reform is necessary..especially on the east coast. It's ridiculous. We'll talk about car insurance some other time....

I think one thing I do have a problem with though, is illegal immigrants who come to this country, get sick and get better treatment than other uninsured or even insured Americans. Example: An illegal immigrant from Mexico needs dialysis for the rest of his life because he ate Advil every day for years becuase he had undiagnosed HTN, resulting in headaches. He was at our hospital for almost 2 years. But he had a wife and baby and even though it wasn't exactly fair, I looked at the human factor. However, later his wife went on Spanish television and said that we were holding her husband hostage. Hey, he was free to go whenever, but he probably would have been sent back to Mexico where he wouldn't get his dialysis and he would die. She then fell under the delusion that the hospital owed HER money because her husband hadn't been able to work for 2 years because he was in the hosptial. He was healthy enough to be outside of the hospital but he didn't have access to dialysis because there was a waiting list and since he was an illegal,he was at the bottom of it. They were very ungrateful and didn't seem to consider the fact that the hospital was most likely keeping him alive.

HEALTH CARE SHOULD BE UNIVERSAL RIGHT> Lots of middle income people in CA dont have insurance as many employers have stopped ofering it Carrrying your own insurance is often way to expensive for a ordinary family, not to mention insurers are getting very very picky over whom they will insure. Due to lack of insurance coverage, 40% thats not a typo of biirths in CA are covered by medicaid. We carrry a policy for me, I work as a CNA. My Dh is covered by the VA as a vet. If we had children we would be in troublle, we dont qualify for assistance of any kind but cant afford any more insurance costs. DH job doesnt offer any thing either and he isnt exaclty poor.. I think if all the other Western European countires can have universal coverage we can too.

Lauura

Specializes in Gerontological, cardiac, med-surg, peds.

Thank you all for your thoughtful responses. I am trying to decide what position to take on this subject; can see both sides. I really feel for people who have no coverage--oftentimes they are good, hard-working people who simply do not have health coverage because they are self-employed or work for an employer who doesn't supply insurance. Something needs to be done; our system is in a mess.

The problem with universal coverage is that sometimes you have to wait months to even years for tests and procedures and surgeries and you kinda have to suffer in the meantime. A friend of mine is originally from Canada and his father had to wait a year a cholecystectomy, even though he was in severe pain. Just getting an MRI may take 6 months. I do have to say that deep down, I believe we should all be entitled to health care in some way shape or form.

The problem is that health care is so incredibly expensive. My ex-husband let the kids' insurance lapse without telling me. My daughter had such severe, radiating, unrelenting pain in her side late one evening that I took her to the ER (she could barely walk). $1400.00 and they did not find anything wrong with her (they ran some blood tests and did a brief physical and a gyno exam -- nothing else). Luckily it hasn't happened again.

That $1400 is half a month's pay (post taxes and everything else they take out). For the average worker bee, a couple of ER visits and they could lose the house, the car...and if those are lost, the job is lost. Universal healthcare makes sense to me.

The hospital was not kind, either, about the fact I had to pay it off in bits. The payment plan they insisted on was more than I could afford per month and they called if it was one day late. Not a pleasant experience.

Specializes in Corrections, Psych, Med-Surg.

At this point, in the US there is only one population that has a legal right to health care (absent a specific contract such as military personnel have) according to the US Supreme Court. And that is the population that is being held by a government-affiliated agency against their will: i.e. prison and jail inmates, involuntarily committed mental health patients, etc.

NO other population has the legal right to health care in the US right now.

At any time in the future, however, Congress could pass a new law assigning this right to certain, or all, other citizens. Given the experience of the Clinton presidency, however, there is little reason to believe such a new law will be passed at any time soon.

Originally posted by fergus51

I think it should be a basic entitlement or right of citizenship, especially for children. I think it is bassackwards to guarantee prisoners medical care, but not children.

Need a clapping smiley for this one....I agree 100%. Also, medical treatment for our senior citizens. My 83 y/o FIL is WW2 vet and Medicare sucks. He is on several prescriptions that are prohibitively expensive...We have looked into VA coverage, but that would mean having to take him to the VA that is 40 miles away for his basic coverage...inconvienent...My FIL was a self-employed dairy farmer who worked hard his whole life to provide for his family...and now we are helping him with his prescriptions and stuff because he can't afford it on his own...hell of a choice...pay for meds that you need but starve to death because you have nothing left over for food...:(

I don't believe it will happen anytime soon . I think the middle class population WITH insurance are the hardest hit by health care costs. A young man I know got sick with West Nile Virus a few years ago. He was a mechanic and his wife owned a beauty shop and they had a new baby. They had insurance. He was hospitalized for 4 mos. They lost everything. They had to sell their home, the business, their cars. Some people say it's better to be poor in times like these. If you don't have anything in the first place, there is nothing to take. It all sucks either way.

One solution that would ease health care costs is increased health promotion and maintenance, with focus on primary prevention, screenings, etc. I am very interested furthering my studies with an emphasis on public health, for that very reason. I don't think we do enough of that. Also, it is hard to reach young people, sometimes. They tend to think they are invincible. By the time they realize they are not, it is usually too late.

One solution that would ease health care costs is increased health promotion and maintenance, with focus on primary prevention, screenings, etc.

I agree with this. The problem is that many people who run the health care system as it is today are not health care providers, they are business people. Preventative primary prevention strategies cost money and the financial outcomes are not realized immediately. It takes months, sometimes years to compile positive outcome research data from preventative programs to prove they are worthy of financial support. The general public and business sector want immediate results, otherwise they feel they are wasting money. I believe that this is one reason that most insurance companies won't pay for preventative services. They believe that they ultimately spend less money only on the ill, rather than thinking upstream and providing coverage for those preventative services, screenings, etc. that identify those at risk and keep people out of the hospital and clinics to begin with. When the budgets get cut, the preventative services suffer, which I believe is the wrong direction to take.

I also agree with the poster that said health care is a right, but with that right also comes responsibility.

+ Add a Comment