NP autonomy in the ED setting

How do you mean? I work in the ER and work basically independently seeing mostly lower acuity patients. If there are a lot of higher acuity patients sometimes I will see some of those as well and then will confer with a MD on their care/tx. There's nobody looking over my shoulder or anything..
This is a rural ER though, so maybe its different in big cities?

Big city here...autonomous as much as I can stand it

Maybe this is particular to that ED or your area? I work in an extremely busy "county" hospital. We work independently and just confer with our attendings when needed. Very independent setting here!

I am a new FNP graduate and have been paying more attention over the last year to the PAs in the ED I work in. I am interested in the ED/urgent care setting too. Like the OP, I see that the doc's all physically see and co-sign all the patients/charts that the PA signs up for, even if it's a simple toe injury! This seems much different than what I experienced in the office setting as a student. While having the docs there for advice/mentoring, I'm not sure I'd like having to wait on the doc to see my patients before I can discharge. Sometimes this really ties up rooms and keeps patients waiting.

I've heard 3 versions as to why this set up is this way...not sure which is the true answer: I'm told by some that the MDs can 'charge' more by doing this. I'm told by others that the MDs simply are CYA. And one other person told me they thought this was just how EDs and midlevels are supposed to be set up...???

I have worked as a RN in 2 different EDs recently. In one the NPs had as much autonomy with sniffles and back aches as their little hearts desired, but never got near an acute abdomen, chest pain or anything marginally interesting. In the other ED, there was no physician, so the NP handled everything. So, in my experience it depends upon the institution.

(We don't have any PAs here)

Yup, depends on the institution and the rules / comfort level there. One facility I know of required the MDs to cosign everything, notes / scripts / etc. Very time consuming, especially considering my state requires MDs only to cosign on 10% of NP charts. Another place was more "call if you need me" kind of a setting (which I prefer!).

Hi All -- I have a question along these lines. I have recently been admitted to both a PA school and a direct entry BS/MSN-FNP program, both at great institutions. The MSN-FNP program is WAY more expensive (tution is like $100,000 rather than $25,000) than the PA program. Both are about 2.5 years.

My interests lie in emergency medicine. Firstly, is a FNP license suitable to work in the ER or do folks find that ER's prefer an ACNP? Secondly, am I more likely to get a job in the ER with a FNP or a PA license? I have worked as an EMT and an ER Technician in the past.

Thanks. I've got a big decision I have to make very soon!

I am inclineed to say go to the PA-C program based on your stats, the relative cost of both programs, and your desire to work in the ED.

I should also mention that I have interests in primary family care too. But the ED still beckons me. Thanks for your input.